|
|
Post by DiBiase is Good on Dec 17, 2006 20:32:53 GMT -5
For those of you not paying attention, the tag title match has become a 4-way ladder match between Londrick, Regal and Taylor, MnM and the Hardys.
Now I'm not complaining cause I paid for this show and am very happy with this development.
But why didn't they announce this from the start?
Would this match have made any difference to the buy rate or are they hoping people might buy the repeat shows?
|
|
|
|
Post by molson5 on Dec 17, 2006 20:33:54 GMT -5
Can Taylor climb a ladder?
|
|
Jeff
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,074
|
Post by Jeff on Dec 17, 2006 20:34:03 GMT -5
I aws hoping for a 3 way TLC match at mania with London/Kendrick vs Hardyz vs MNM, this is better.
And no I dont buy ppv's ever
|
|
Matt Rogers
King Koopa
member is currently offline <stalking Emma Watson>
Omae wa mo shindeiru.
Posts: 11,869
|
Post by Matt Rogers on Dec 17, 2006 20:34:20 GMT -5
Hell, I might well have bought it!
|
|
EvilMasterBetty, Esq.
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Bird...Birdie...birdie......Tiger...Tiger Tiger.....
R2C2 Reporting for duty
Posts: 17,355
|
Post by EvilMasterBetty, Esq. on Dec 17, 2006 20:34:47 GMT -5
WHAT!!!
Why in gods name do you NOT hype that match?
WHY!??!
|
|
mo
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
"Here are the young men, the weight on their shoulders..."
Posts: 16,661 
|
Post by mo on Dec 17, 2006 20:40:51 GMT -5
this actually was reported on the Observer, however, it just said that one of the matches will be different than advertised
|
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Dec 17, 2006 20:41:42 GMT -5
Ah, those brillaint folks at WWE.
Not advertising THIS match.
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Dec 17, 2006 20:43:09 GMT -5
Ah f*** i wish they would advertise matches a bit better.
If i'd known, i would have ordered it
|
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Dec 17, 2006 20:47:13 GMT -5
So is WWE wrong for not advertising a possibly great match that would have brought in buy rates, or are they right in making people feel like they missed something by not ordering, and therefore, will order next time? Because we all know that anything can happen in WWE?
Personally, I feel kinda bummed that I may be missing Paul London doing a shooting star press off a ladder.
|
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Dec 17, 2006 20:49:10 GMT -5
So is WWE wrong for not advertising a possibly great match that would have brought in buy rates, or are they right in making people feel like they missed something by not ordering, and therefore, will order next time? Because we all know that anything can happen in WWE? I still think it's baiting and switching, and in the end if they keep doing it as much as they do they are going to do more harm than good in holding their fanbase. |
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Dec 17, 2006 20:49:45 GMT -5
WWE is at fault for not advertising
After the Atrocious D2D people would have been wary about single brand PPV's, that;s why i didn't order it
|
|
EvilMasterBetty, Esq.
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Bird...Birdie...birdie......Tiger...Tiger Tiger.....
R2C2 Reporting for duty
Posts: 17,355
|
Post by EvilMasterBetty, Esq. on Dec 17, 2006 21:29:36 GMT -5
seriously, you would think after that crap PPV, they would hype the hell out of this one where they can to make people buy it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Bolty, Disaster Enby on Dec 17, 2006 21:36:32 GMT -5
Well, maybe they're hoping for big DVD sales on this one. Hopefully. As is, they screwed up a chance to really shine a spotlight on London & Kendrick.
|
|
|
|
Post by 01010010 01101001 01100011 on Dec 17, 2006 21:57:18 GMT -5
If he keeps this up (an unannounced show stealer at each show or most shows) then more people are going to order on the chance of something major happening, whether it is the live show, replay or, DVD. That sounds like a smart business decision to me.
|
|
KLRA
El Dandy
Halt. I am Reptar.
Posts: 7,591
|
Post by KLRA on Dec 17, 2006 22:03:29 GMT -5
If he keeps this up (an unannounced show stealer at each show or most shows) then more people are going to order on the chance of something major happening, whether it is the live show, replay or, DVD. That sounds like a smart business decision to me. yeah, if the matches are show stealers. But because this is the 'E, no one in their right mind is going to trust Vince and co. to give us an amazing "secret" match. This is stupid, because the majority of WWE PPVs nowadays SUCK. |
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Dec 17, 2006 22:16:12 GMT -5
I would have watched this PPV if I would have known about this match. Why do they always do stupid crap like this?
|
|
|
|
Post by tna on Dec 17, 2006 22:37:06 GMT -5
buyrates would have been a little higher if they announced this match on tv.
|
|
|
|
Post by Threadkiller [Classic] on Dec 17, 2006 22:42:16 GMT -5
MNM vs. Londrick vs. Hardyz vs. WGTT at WM please.
Although the urge to do another MITB match will probably start itching Creative by the time WM rolls around.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tyfo on Dec 17, 2006 22:43:59 GMT -5
It's good to do things like that. Everyone whines about how theres no suprises anymore and they can predict everything thats going to happen. They need to do stuff like this from time to time to make people realize, yes we can still suprise you and if you aren't watching you may miss something important.
|
|
|
|
Post by drjayphd (feat. Pitbull) on Dec 17, 2006 22:44:24 GMT -5
MNM vs. Londrick vs. Hardyz vs. WGTT at WM please. Although the urge to do another MITB match will probably start itching Creative by the time WM rolls around. Throw Taygal and some other swanktastic tag team in there, make it a tag-team MITB match, and I'm eatin' it. |
|
![Threadkiller [Classic] Avatar](http://storage.proboards.com/forum/images/av_default_male.png)
