|
Post by MiLo Duck on Dec 6, 2010 3:39:37 GMT -5
Now that it isn't just a recap show with one match of original content its my favorite of the three. I love most of the guys on the show and wanted to see more of them for awhile, and am enjoying the guys like Barreta and Reks that I'm not used to. It also feels like late mid to late 80's WCW for some reason. Who knows, maybe its just the meds I'm on but Hawkins is really working for me as a featured performer.
So yeah, cheers all around to Superstars.
|
|
@TenaciousBe
Hank Scorpio
Guess who's back... back again
Posts: 5,659
|
Post by @TenaciousBe on Dec 6, 2010 6:10:52 GMT -5
I honestly had no idea that the channel was so rare. Interesting. Agreed. It blows me away when this is brought up around Superstars; I've never lived in a place that DIDN'T have it as a basic channel on the lowest tier of cable stations. I rarely watch it. At first, I was pissed cause they advertised it as being "no less than the main shows" with main eventers and storyline advancement happening on a weekly basis. And now it's just... random guys with no direction getting to put on a meaningless match now and then. Most of the time, honestly, I just forget it's on. And the lack of storyline advancement is a big part of it, though as someone who does love the midcard, I suppose I should be into it. Maybe I'll go and start checking it out.
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Dec 6, 2010 6:51:13 GMT -5
I don't watch it because I don't get WGN, and I always forget that it's on Hulu.
|
|
|
Post by kodiak on Dec 6, 2010 13:24:11 GMT -5
Put me in the camp that doesn't get WGN, and I can't watch anything streaming online as I'm still on DSL. The Superstars matches they filmed at the last Raw I went to were pretty good - well, Young vs. Primo was anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Indifference Abounds on Dec 6, 2010 13:58:52 GMT -5
I think my main problem with Superstars is that WWE books it in such a way that I know, as far as storylines are concerned, I'm missing absolutely nothing by not watching it. As of late, I only really watch Raw because it's the only show where the bookers seem to be putting any effort into giving us must-see storylines, even if I disagree with how they do it. They keep me interested, despite the wrestling being far from top-notch.
A lot of guys I like are on Superstars, but I think my exasperation that their matches mean absolutely nothing makes it hard for me to watch them.
|
|
The Ichi
Patti Mayonnaise
AGGRESSIVE Executive Janitor of the Third Floor Manager's Bathroom
Posts: 37,354
|
Post by The Ichi on Dec 6, 2010 14:10:44 GMT -5
I just forget about it, honestly. Only times I've ever watched it was when I'd be channel surfing and catch it on. I don't even know what times it shows over here.
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Dec 6, 2010 14:12:09 GMT -5
I honestly forget it exists. It's never presented as important, and they never mention it on either of the two main shows, so I go weeks on end without acknowledging it's existence.
|
|
|
Post by i.Sarita.com on Dec 6, 2010 14:28:51 GMT -5
I did randomly watch the Baretta/Hawkins match with my little brother when I was over at my dad's house a few weeks ago. And before that...I can't remember the last time I watched anything on Superstars.
|
|
|
Post by calibancalhoun on Dec 6, 2010 14:31:56 GMT -5
I dont have that channel
|
|
|
Post by Shameful_Lobsterhead on Dec 6, 2010 14:37:53 GMT -5
I don't feel like watching Ryder / Goldust / Primo and the rest, wrestle.
|
|
|
Post by jadison on Dec 6, 2010 15:03:19 GMT -5
Superstars is absolutely perfect to rinse the bad taste that TNA Impact leaves in my mouth. From 3 hours of politicks/shoot angles/shaky camera nonsense to an hour of decent wrestling matches.
|
|