|
Post by #Classic Hi-Definition X on Dec 31, 2005 9:48:39 GMT -5
Now that the year is just about over, what grade would you give WWE for its performance?
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Dec 31, 2005 9:55:02 GMT -5
some great moments have happend but they are lost in all the crap.
|
|
|
Post by angryfan on Dec 31, 2005 10:18:39 GMT -5
Bright spots, glimpses of hope, but overall, the effort isn't there. Cruise control and people wanting to be Hollywood writers. I give them a very sincere C-
|
|
Erik Majorwitz
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
I don't have a PS3.
Longest Crapper- Laying it across the table
Posts: 18,051
|
Post by Erik Majorwitz on Dec 31, 2005 10:21:23 GMT -5
F for not putting a strap on The Boogeyman.
Semper Fi, Erik Majorwitz
|
|
erisi236
Fry's dog Seymour
... enjoys the rich, smooth taste of Camels.
Not good! Not good! Not good!
Posts: 21,904
|
Post by erisi236 on Dec 31, 2005 10:31:47 GMT -5
C+ that last 2 or 3 months of Smackdown raised the grade up from a C-
|
|
CM Putnam
Trap-Jaw
"It's funny how the colors of the real world only seem really real when you viddy them on a screen."
Posts: 252
|
Post by CM Putnam on Dec 31, 2005 11:11:18 GMT -5
I have never been more of a wrestling fan then I am right now. I have also never hated WWE more then I do now. WWE is not wrestling. It's an a lame attempt at a soap opera with overly muscular guys. I will give them the benefit of the doubt. Wrestlemania 21 was great as well as Vengence. But after the draft lottery, it all went down hill
D
|
|
|
Post by Danimal on Dec 31, 2005 12:03:59 GMT -5
Bright spots, glimpses of hope, but overall, the effort isn't there. Cruise control and people wanting to be Hollywood writers. I give them a very sincere C- I'd also give it a C and say they are on "cruise control", being a monopoly allows them to put out a meh product.
|
|
|
Post by invaderdave on Dec 31, 2005 12:05:29 GMT -5
I will say it's somewhere in the C- to C range.
|
|
|
Post by vitamink on Dec 31, 2005 12:24:07 GMT -5
I'll give them a B-
It wasn't too great of a year, but compared to last year, it's gold.
|
|
Hiroshi Hase
Patti Mayonnaise
The Good Ol' Days
Posts: 30,755
|
Post by Hiroshi Hase on Dec 31, 2005 12:32:08 GMT -5
It wasn't the greatest year they had, but I'll say it's better than 2004. Having said that, I gave them a C-, too much crap in the second half of 2005 that swayed my vote.
|
|
MichaelRBoh
Unicron
cowpee changed gimmick
Posts: 3,301
|
Post by MichaelRBoh on Dec 31, 2005 12:43:47 GMT -5
i'll give them a b- i was entertained and never bored. and they did produce some memorable future wrestlecrap moments such as dr heiny and tim white.
the biggest negative was seeing chris masters get pushed so hard.
|
|
|
Post by Shy Guy on Dec 31, 2005 12:47:40 GMT -5
lots of new comers this year and some pretty decent matches on free television (akio\london, shelton\hbk)
however
the heart throbs are not tag champs (yet), and too many hall of famers.
i'll go with a B.
|
|
|
Post by thehatman on Dec 31, 2005 13:36:49 GMT -5
E for effort.
Hell, let's face it, they tried. They failed. Back to the drawing board.
|
|
|
Post by GnarKill on Dec 31, 2005 15:10:49 GMT -5
C-, but an A for wrestlecrap
|
|
|
Post by UnderFaker on Dec 31, 2005 15:18:04 GMT -5
is there anything lower then F? it had it's moments but the crap outweighed the good like all year.Something good would come around,followed by something soooooo crapalicious that there was no way to forget about and over look it.
|
|
|
Post by EvilShadow76 on Dec 31, 2005 15:24:50 GMT -5
I'd give them a C- for 2005. They did some things right Batista's face turn etc) but they also had a lot of crap as well (Dominic storyline among others.) Hopefully 2006 will be a little better.
|
|
WWHHHD
Unicron
Break it down for a 5 second pose!
Posts: 3,467
|
Post by WWHHHD on Dec 31, 2005 15:27:07 GMT -5
B because it was a good year just most of the ppl here nit pick at things they don't like and think the whole E is going down because they don't like one person. I don't like Cena but it led to more Kurt Angle so that gets the B for me.
|
|
|
Post by foodcourtdruid on Dec 31, 2005 15:37:54 GMT -5
I really thought about this, I had to go with C-. Here's why in no particular order:
- Cena's title run. I thought he was amusing as a midcard rapper, but his gimmick is REALLY boring as a main eventer. - Diva contest RETURNS. - Dominic story line. - JR Colon Surgery spoof. - Another year completely misusing Kane. - Hogan coming and going with a pointless victory over a mainstay in the WWE. - LOD. - The McMahon's returning to RAW. - Coach getting so much airtime.
|
|
|
Post by Tyfo on Dec 31, 2005 15:42:53 GMT -5
I went with a C+, it wasnt their best year for sure, but it also was no where near their worst, hints the right in the middle grade. I thought it was better then 2002, 2003 or 2004. Many great moments, but they could still improve a lot, so i guess we'll see what happens in '06!
|
|
|
Post by SHAKEMASTER TV9 is Don Knotts on Dec 31, 2005 16:01:10 GMT -5
J for just
|
|