nWoElite
Don Corleone
Putting The Band Back Together...
Posts: 1,686
|
Post by nWoElite on Jan 4, 2012 10:53:54 GMT -5
Geared for children, ladies and gents.
For most kids, unless their parents had them watch old WWF/E material, know nothing about the old Kane/'Taker matches, so for them this would be new. That's the reason you have been seeing things that they have done before, because the younger viewers have yet to see/experience.
With Kane's current gimmick I can see a 4th match. A buried alive match where 'Taker can go out 20-0 but still gets buried in the end, allowing him to retire still on top, and Kane still saves face because even tho he lost, he still managed to put him away for good.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Jan 4, 2012 10:54:06 GMT -5
Did anyone else notice that Kane is now using the mandible claw? He did it on Raw this week. Can it be that Kane is being controlled by Mick Foley in order to do something? Maybe Foley is trying to bring Cena to the dark side as a result of the ill fated This Is Your Life deal. He's not using the mandible claw. He smothered Cenas face with his hand, likely because he can't choke him around the neck anymore. The mandible claw involved pressing down underneath the persons tongue. Very very different moves.
|
|
|
Post by rapidfire187 on Jan 4, 2012 10:56:50 GMT -5
Geared for children, ladies and gents. For most kids, unless their parents had them watch old WWF/E material, know nothing about the old Kane/'Taker matches, so for them this would be new. That's the reason you have been seeing things that they have done before, because the younger viewers have yet to see/experience. With Kane's current gimmick I can see a 4th match. A buried alive match where 'Taker can go out 20-0 but still gets buried in the end, allowing him to retire still on top, and Kane still saves face because even tho he lost, he still managed to put him away for good. Sorry but that logic stinks. When I was a kid, I would rent old home videos and watch stuff from years before, especially stuff involving guys that were still wrestling. Kids these days have it even easier with YouTube and whatnot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2012 11:06:41 GMT -5
Geared for children, ladies and gents. For most kids, unless their parents had them watch old WWF/E material, know nothing about the old Kane/'Taker matches, so for them this would be new. That's the reason you have been seeing things that they have done before, because the younger viewers have yet to see/experience. With Kane's current gimmick I can see a 4th match. A buried alive match where 'Taker can go out 20-0 but still gets buried in the end, allowing him to retire still on top, and Kane still saves face because even tho he lost, he still managed to put him away for good. Sorry but that logic stinks. When I was a kid, I would rent old home videos and watch stuff from years before, especially stuff involving guys that were still wrestling. Kids these days have it even easier with YouTube and whatnot. Not to mention the fact that Undertaker and Kane only just had a series of matches a little over a year ago. And that feud had all the usual Taker/Kane supernatural stuff we’ve come to expect. No one who saw those matches could forget how absolutely horrible they were. I have no idea why anyone would want to see anymore. As for the whole Kane being a perfect final opponent for Taker due to their history thing…people honestly think Taker’s having his last match at WM 28 and he’s not going to face John Cena in the main event of WM 29?
|
|
Hanzo
Dennis Stamp
"You want Cena to go to ECW?!"
Posts: 4,666
|
Post by Hanzo on Jan 4, 2012 11:12:01 GMT -5
I've always been a big Kane fan and on top of that I'm a huge sucker for UT/Kane matches. So, I'd be all for it.
It doesn't help that Kane's been made to look like a total chump in his matches against UT, though (with the exception of their Night of Champions match). I think he's beaten UT clean once, maybe?
|
|
|
Post by The Shareholder is nude on Jan 4, 2012 12:04:56 GMT -5
Hasn't Kane stated that when Taker retires he was going to retire too? I can see this match between them sort of like Hulk vs Sentry....in the end they both knock each other senseless. Taker can win, but he is beaten so badly he is never seen again. Same with Kane, who can be dragged to Hell in the middle of the ring.
|
|
JCBaggee
Hank Scorpio
Writer, streamer. I used to write for CBR but then they fired everyone who cared about their writers
Posts: 6,781
|
Post by JCBaggee on Jan 4, 2012 12:17:16 GMT -5
How's this? So they both beat the hell out of each other, only to be knocked out in the middle of the ring and the match end in a double count-out, when Paul Bearer comes out accompanied by druids. Paul looks at his fallen sons, weeps and opens the urn. The lights go out, the ominous music stops and when the lights come back up, everyone is gone, never to be seen again.
I'd also considered maybe something like the druids grabbing both bodies and ceremoniously carrying them to the back, almost as if it were a funeral dirge, but I think the size of the two men makes that a bit difficult.
|
|
|
Post by Branimal on Jan 4, 2012 13:03:27 GMT -5
No. Just.. no. I can't even explain how much I don't want this match.
|
|
The Ichi
Patti Mayonnaise
AGGRESSIVE Executive Janitor of the Third Floor Manager's Bathroom
Posts: 37,281
|
Post by The Ichi on Jan 4, 2012 13:37:32 GMT -5
I think I want the match for the sole reason that Kane is the only person I could picture ending the streak (due to Taker saying in interviews that he's who he would want to end it). It's the only Taker opponent where I'd have a shred of doubt, something I wouldn't even have for Taker/HHH or Taker/Cena.
|
|
nWoElite
Don Corleone
Putting The Band Back Together...
Posts: 1,686
|
Post by nWoElite on Jan 4, 2012 16:42:27 GMT -5
Geared for children, ladies and gents. For most kids, unless their parents had them watch old WWF/E material, know nothing about the old Kane/'Taker matches, so for them this would be new. That's the reason you have been seeing things that they have done before, because the younger viewers have yet to see/experience. With Kane's current gimmick I can see a 4th match. A buried alive match where 'Taker can go out 20-0 but still gets buried in the end, allowing him to retire still on top, and Kane still saves face because even tho he lost, he still managed to put him away for good. Sorry but that logic stinks. When I was a kid, I would rent old home videos and watch stuff from years before, especially stuff involving guys that were still wrestling. Kids these days have it even easier with YouTube and whatnot. Not every child has your way of thinking dude.
|
|
|
Post by Can you afford to pay me, Gah on Jan 4, 2012 19:11:25 GMT -5
Sorry but that logic stinks. When I was a kid, I would rent old home videos and watch stuff from years before, especially stuff involving guys that were still wrestling. Kids these days have it even easier with YouTube and whatnot. Not every child has your way of thinking dude. So you saying that in a technolegy diven world we live in. That the child is still a clueless putz? As much internet is used in schools and how most of the people these days at less as an internet connected computer, If you logic was the case. Then Wrestling would never evolve because we would have to have the same feuds. Because the "young" crowd have no clue. So I guess in 2010 we should have had Hogan vs. Warrior. Since these young kids don't know what they where. Same logic. That like saying we would have to have Bret Hart vs
|
|