Post by wwefan71080 on Dec 26, 2012 21:44:00 GMT -5
It would be the night after the Royal Rumble and the Undertaker makes his annual return and all of the sudden The Shield come from the stands and beat down Undertaker and say on raw the next week "The Undertaker comes back for one match a year, that is the biggest injustice of them all getting to main event only wrestling once a year" The next week on Raw they challenge The Undertaker to break his {Undeserved} streak and The Undertaker accepts the challenge
Wrestlemania 29 Undertaker d. The Shield, this match will make huge stars of The Shield by making them look strong and as always The Undertaker will look strong even though he will be carried out of the ring and even in defeat The Shield will have achieved their goal of taking out the Undertaker for good
Would this work or am I just living in a fantasy land
Last Edit: Dec 26, 2012 21:45:03 GMT -5 by wwefan71080
i don't know how losing to a single man make the SHield look strong.
It's the Undertaker, , and I forgot that Kane will interfere in the match and getting revenge he tombstones Roman Reigns, chokeslams Seth Rollins, while the Undertaker puts Dean Ambrose in Hell's Gate and Dean passes out laughing with a smile on his face
Post by Unaffiliated on Dec 26, 2012 22:01:53 GMT -5
A 3-on-1 Handicap match? Against the almost 50-year-old Undertaker? I don't think there is any way possible to make the Shield look strong, even if they win.
i don't know how losing to a single man make the SHield look strong.
It's the Undertaker, , and I forgot that Kane will interfere in the match and getting revenge he tombstones Roman Reigns, chokeslams Seth Rollins, while the Undertaker puts Dean Ambrose in Hell's Gate and Dean passes out laughing with a smile on his face
hope this is better clarified now
Despite his best attempts, Dean Ambrose is not Heath Ledger playing The Joker. That finishing scenario would come across as completely ridiculous.
It's the Undertaker, , and I forgot that Kane will interfere in the match and getting revenge he tombstones Roman Reigns, chokeslams Seth Rollins, while the Undertaker puts Dean Ambrose in Hell's Gate and Dean passes out laughing with a smile on his face
hope this is better clarified now
Despite his best attempts, Dean Ambrose is not Heath Ledger playing The Joker. That finishing scenario would come across as completely ridiculous.
Yeh it'd look like hes corpsing and come off wrong
It would be the night after the Royal Rumble and the Undertaker makes his annual return and all of the sudden The Shield come from the stands and beat down Undertaker and say on raw the next week "The Undertaker comes back for one match a year, that is the biggest injustice of them all getting to main event only wrestling once a year" "It's all part of a bigger picture!"
HBK teased it before. It's nowhere near out of the realms of booking possibility. He wins the Rumble and wants Taker.
Taker was the champ at the time. He wins he challenges that title. Wrestlers can't remember that elimination chamber is a thing...despite how DANGEROUS it is!
This could be a decent match, especially if the latter team dominates. Hell, you could throw in Shawn Michaels (hell, it's a given anymore that he's going to be there..so might as well give him something that works) there as a run in in order to "even things out". While Taker and Brock are battling it out, Trips and Michaels go after the Shield with chairs and such, incapacitating them. In the end, Brock eats SCM. Triple H goes for the cover. Brock powers the f*** out. Taker gets super pissed at Trips for hogging the glory by trying to "steal a win, when it's Taker's "thing"", chokeslams him and Shawn. Brock has recovered by this point and gets Taker in the position for the F5, but Taker reverses then tombstones Brock for the victory.
Last Edit: Dec 27, 2012 0:50:02 GMT -5 by mizerable