Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2013 9:06:46 GMT -5
Normally I don't advocate putting a title match last at the Rumble, but I think Rock/Punk is a bigger deal than just it being a title match.
|
|
Arrow
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 5,122
|
Post by Arrow on Jan 14, 2013 9:18:40 GMT -5
It all depends entirely on what's going down in the Rumble. If it's just going to be a normal Cena or Ryback victory, with nothing else really happening, then put the WWE title match last. It's bigger and more interesting. If you've got Rock or Punk winning the Rumble, or a big return like Lesnar or 'Taker, then put the Rumble last.
|
|
kidglov3s
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants her Shot
Who is Tiger Maskooo?
Posts: 15,870
|
Post by kidglov3s on Jan 14, 2013 9:22:47 GMT -5
It all depends entirely on what's going down in the Rumble. If it's just going to be a normal Cena or Ryback victory, with nothing else really happening, then put the WWE title match last. It's bigger and more interesting. If you've got Rock or Punk winning the Rumble, or a big return like Lesnar or 'Taker, then put the Rumble last. But wouldn't it be even cooler to have CM Punk win the Royal Rumble and then defeat The Rock to retain his WWE title? Choosing himself as his Wrestlemania opponent, the only worthy challenger.
|
|
Big L
Grimlock
Posts: 13,883
|
Post by Big L on Jan 14, 2013 18:09:46 GMT -5
WHC, Royal Rumble, WWE
|
|