|
Post by Pillman's Pencil on Jul 21, 2014 19:26:19 GMT -5
Away from the Raw thread a minute..
Yeah people are going 'LOL Triple H you go man, burn the IWC', but that just sounded like sour grapes, last nights show was nothing more than a glorified Raw as well as ditching one of the main events and its as if they are in the mindset of 'F**k you this is what we're doing weather you like or not'. It won't win subscribers to the WWE Network which is failing right now, its almost as if they took the reaction last night on social media very personally.
|
|
|
Post by joeiscool on Jul 21, 2014 19:40:24 GMT -5
I mean, Idk what people where expecting. There were at least 3 good matches, and a excellent tag match.
It seems as if a lot of people are just mad cause their guy didn't win, which is in it's self kinda dumb.
If you don't like the product watch something else. It's not like wwe is holding a gun to anyone's head or something dumb like that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2014 19:41:29 GMT -5
Triple H is of the opinion that any heat is good heat really, so I can get his character doing it, I don't think he himself cares too much but anything to get a reaction etc.
|
|
|
Post by celticjobber on Jul 21, 2014 19:42:23 GMT -5
I mean, Idk what people where expecting. There were at least 3 good matches, and a excellent tag match. It seems as if a lot of people are just mad cause their guy didn't win, which is in it's self kinda dumb.If you don't like the product watch something else. It's not like wwe is holding a gun to anyone's head or something dumb like that. I think most of the complaints were over WWE cancelling one of the advertised matches (Ambrose vs. Rollins). Which IMO, was a pretty shitty move.
|
|
|
Post by PsychoGoatee on Jul 21, 2014 19:45:31 GMT -5
If you don't like the product watch something else. It's not like wwe is holding a gun to anyone's head or something dumb like that. I'd just like to point out, a media company holding a gun to a fan's head would be a serious crime, dumb isn't the adjective I'd pick. Highly dangerous and illegal of WWE if they did this. In fact Vince holding a gun to my head is in the top ten most terrifying nightmares I can think of.
|
|
|
Post by Pillman's Pencil on Jul 21, 2014 19:45:36 GMT -5
I mean, Idk what people where expecting. There were at least 3 good matches, and a excellent tag match. It seems as if a lot of people are just mad cause their guy didn't win, which is in it's self kinda dumb. If you don't like the product watch something else. It's not like wwe is holding a gun to anyone's head or something dumb like that. My guy didn't win...or lose.
|
|
|
Post by joeiscool on Jul 21, 2014 19:45:39 GMT -5
I mean, Idk what people where expecting. There were at least 3 good matches, and a excellent tag match. It seems as if a lot of people are just mad cause their guy didn't win, which is in it's self kinda dumb.If you don't like the product watch something else. It's not like wwe is holding a gun to anyone's head or something dumb like that. I think most of the complaints were over WWE cancelling one of the advertised matches (Ambrose vs. Rollins). Which IMO, was a pretty shitty move. What we got was still pretty cool, and added to the story.
|
|
|
Post by Pillman's Pencil on Jul 21, 2014 19:47:37 GMT -5
I think most of the complaints were over WWE cancelling one of the advertised matches (Ambrose vs. Rollins). Which IMO, was a pretty shitty move. What we got was still pretty cool, and added to the story. You do that on Raw, not on a PPV! Entertainment is subjective, plain and simple.
|
|
|
Post by joeiscool on Jul 21, 2014 19:50:59 GMT -5
What we got was still pretty cool, and added to the story. You do that on Raw, not on a PPV! You do it on what ever you want to do it on...
|
|
|
Post by Pillman's Pencil on Jul 21, 2014 19:52:32 GMT -5
You do that on Raw, not on a PPV! You do it on what ever you want to do it on... Not when you want to win back subscribers to the network.
|
|
|
Post by Giul T. on Jul 21, 2014 19:54:03 GMT -5
HHH and WWE can do whatever they want, but they have to face the backlash of those actions, justified or not.
|
|
|
Post by Andy Martin on Jul 21, 2014 19:54:13 GMT -5
I mean...He's right.
|
|
|
Post by Pillman's Pencil on Jul 21, 2014 19:56:03 GMT -5
HHH and WWE can do whatever they want, but they have to face the backlash of those actions, justified or not. Agreed, but don't trash people if its negative.
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Jul 21, 2014 19:57:57 GMT -5
First, WWE Network is not failing, it is just not meeting McMahon's inflated expectations. Now PPV sucked, deserved the hate and I think Trips would even admit that if forced to, however, he's a heel and making fun of the fans and what they want has been a staple of heeldom since there first were heels. Shit, I'd say WWE doesn't do stuff like that enough on both sides of the coin.
|
|
Chiral
Salacious Crumb
Posts: 73,473
|
Post by Chiral on Jul 21, 2014 20:01:28 GMT -5
What we got was still pretty cool, and added to the story. You do that on Raw, not on a PPV! Entertainment is subjective, plain and simple. I still don't get why they showed the video package if the match wasn't gonna happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2014 20:06:15 GMT -5
Self-aware Triple H is the best Triple H.
I don't care if what he says is because he's upset at the fans, it adds to his character. If people get pissed, he's doing his job. If people love it? He's getting a reaction out of it. Overall it adds to his character so I'm fine with it.
|
|
mrbananagrabber
King Koopa
Paul Heyman's unofficial joke writer
Posts: 11,786
|
Post by mrbananagrabber on Jul 21, 2014 20:07:37 GMT -5
I read it as HHH addressing the people crying over the Lana comment.
|
|
|
Post by DASH 243✅ on Jul 21, 2014 22:09:23 GMT -5
HHH forgot to mention tout
|
|
|
Post by N E O G E O B O Y S on Jul 21, 2014 22:29:05 GMT -5
Heels being heels? the world
|
|
|
Post by cabbageboy on Jul 21, 2014 22:35:23 GMT -5
I actually cracked up at this one tonight since I too am sick of hearing "OMG I will cancel my subscription because Cena won!" type crap. It's obvious that they have a plan in mind that does not involve Cena. Good grief, the guy won a thrown together 4 way on a nothing PPV that probably shouldn't exist. In fact why not just have the main PPVs be actual PPVs and then make these B list jobber PPVs into Network specials?
|
|