Spider2024
Patti Mayonnaise
Dedicated 6,666th post to Irontyger
I believe in Joe Hendry.
Posts: 39,196
|
Post by Spider2024 on Jul 27, 2014 15:03:46 GMT -5
I haven't seen much discussion on whether Seth Rollins, Mr. Money In The Bank, will cash in successfully and become World Champion. Normally it would be almost a certainty that a world title reign would be in Rollins' future. But now there have been 3 total MITB winners (including Mr. Kennedy) who failed to win the World Title on the cash in. Also, it's been so long since a first time World Champion has been crowned in WWE, we're no longer used to it happening. So will Seth do it? Will he be WWE World Heavyweight Champion sooner rather than later?
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jul 27, 2014 15:06:53 GMT -5
Two minutes after Daniel Bryan regains it.
|
|
Johnny
Don Corleone
Achievement Unlocked: TLDR - Read the longest post in board history.
Posts: 1,671
|
Post by Johnny on Jul 27, 2014 15:07:07 GMT -5
Yes, but after wrestlemania
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Jul 27, 2014 15:07:53 GMT -5
Yes.
But even if he doesn't, he's not going to fall down the card the way Sandow did.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2014 15:14:02 GMT -5
Depends on who has the belt. He's not going to cash in on Brock, and I can't see them ending Roman's first run via cash in whenever he gets it. His best bet is either on Cena or Bryan should he ever return and get the title.
|
|
|
Post by Neo: "The One" who CLAPS on Jul 27, 2014 15:16:34 GMT -5
I just have a feeling that Reigns will beat Lesnar at WM, and Rollins will cash in immediately after and lose
|
|
RIHT
Hank Scorpio
Wanted a title with "YOU'RE WELCOME!" Close enough.
Hey-yo.
Posts: 5,897
|
Post by RIHT on Jul 27, 2014 15:21:03 GMT -5
The only thing is that I can't see Rollins really cashing on anyone. The only scenarios I can see are him using MITB to make a Reigns/Rollins/Ambrose triple threat for the title at WM or him cashing in on Daniel Bryan after he returns to win the title.
|
|
|
Post by bootytea on Jul 27, 2014 18:38:46 GMT -5
Simply not ready.
At this point at time, Seth screams midcarder.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
|
|
|
Post by Threadkiller [Classic] on Jul 27, 2014 18:57:18 GMT -5
I just don't see how. Maybe if there were still two world titles, but I don't see WWE giving Seth the ball. Maybe they'll give him a cup of coffee run, but that has the potential to do as much harm as good.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew is Good on Jul 27, 2014 19:09:00 GMT -5
I think so. I feel they're going to build him up as potentially the number one heel in the company. One positive with the Money in the Bank contract and having one title is you don't have schmucks fighting for the loser World Title.
|
|
|
Post by ronnie2hotty on Jul 28, 2014 13:23:56 GMT -5
probably yes... if WWE is smart..
I hope they don't blow it on a meaningless cash in. They need to play it out, quite similar to Edge.
|
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Jul 28, 2014 13:57:02 GMT -5
I just don't see how. Maybe if there were still two world titles, but I don't see WWE giving Seth the ball. Maybe they'll give him a cup of coffee run, but that has the potential to do as much harm as good. I don't see how it does any harm, really. If he has a good program running with someone else, it doesn't matter if he particularly draws as a champion, as long as his opponent does. On top of that, he's at a much higher calibre than both Reigns and Ambrose, so if he remains heel and they decide to give either Ambrose or Reigns a shot..it'll be a good feud and I'd say it could draw money. The Shield was a big act, and it wasn't because of one or two guys. If WWE was smart, they'd still push all three guys to the absolute top. It doesn't work if you have one or two, and it'll make subsequent Shield reunions less interesting.
|
|