Abdullah
Hank Scorpio
Thank you, Ishmeal Loves Bayley!
Posts: 6,420
|
Post by Abdullah on Aug 23, 2014 7:02:46 GMT -5
Welp, I think you can expect Paige vs AJ vs Natalya pretty soon. If that's the logic, add Eva too. I'd rather Nattie get her shot in a long match on Main Event.
|
|
|
Post by Pillman's Pencil on Aug 23, 2014 8:50:17 GMT -5
Very true.
|
|
ededdneddy
Hank Scorpio
ededdandembed
Posts: 5,697
|
Post by ededdneddy on Aug 23, 2014 13:48:58 GMT -5
Night of Champions my thoughts
WWE World Heavyweight Championship Brock Lesnar (c) vs. John Cena
WWE Tag Team Championship Tag Team Turmoil The Uso's (c) vs. Dust2Dust vs. RybAxel vs. Slater Gator vs. The Wyatt Family
Divas Championship Match Paige (c) vs. AJ vs. Natalya
Intercontinental Championship Dolph Ziggler (c) vs. The Miz
United States Championship Sheamus (c) vs. Rusev
Seth Rollins & Randy Orton vs. Dean Ambrose & Roman Reigns
|
|
JoDaNa1281
Crow T. Robot
Jackie Daytona, Regular Human Bartender. #BLM
Posts: 40,127
|
Post by JoDaNa1281 on Aug 23, 2014 14:43:08 GMT -5
Right now, I'll go with
WWE WHC: Brock Lesnar(c) vs. John Cena
IC Title: Dolph Ziggler(c) vs. The Miz
US Title: Sheamus(c) vs. Cesaro
Tag Titles 4 Way Match: Usos(c) vs. Wyatt Family vs. Slater Gator vs. GoldStar
Divas Title Triple Threat: Paige(c) vs. AJ Lee vs. Natalya
Seth Rollins & Randy Orton vs. Dean Ambrose & Roman Reigns
Rusev vs. Mark Henry
|
|
|
Post by Gerard Gerard on Aug 23, 2014 15:24:28 GMT -5
I'm banking on Ambrose decking Kane if he's done filming by NoC, keeps him away from Rollins for a month 'til HiaC.
|
|
gl83
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,922
|
Post by gl83 on Aug 24, 2014 9:51:50 GMT -5
Welp, I think you can expect Paige vs AJ vs Natalya pretty soon. If that's the logic, add Eva too. I'd rather Nattie get her shot in a long match on Main Event. Most likely Natalya is going to be used as the "fall girl" so to speak, where her only purpose is just to take the loss to extend AJ/Paige's feud. Right now, while Natalya is scoring wins against Paige, AJ/Paige remains the focal point.
|
|
Abdullah
Hank Scorpio
Thank you, Ishmeal Loves Bayley!
Posts: 6,420
|
Post by Abdullah on Aug 24, 2014 9:54:40 GMT -5
If that's the logic, add Eva too. I'd rather Nattie get her shot in a long match on Main Event. Most likely Natalya is going to be used as the "fall girl" so to speak, where her only purpose is just to take the loss to extend AJ/Paige's feud. Right now, while Natalya is scoring wins against Paige, AJ/Paige remains the focal point. I don't see AJ/Paige extending to Hell in a Cell.
|
|
gl83
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,922
|
Post by gl83 on Aug 24, 2014 15:39:40 GMT -5
Most likely Natalya is going to be used as the "fall girl" so to speak, where her only purpose is just to take the loss to extend AJ/Paige's feud. Right now, while Natalya is scoring wins against Paige, AJ/Paige remains the focal point. I don't see AJ/Paige extending to Hell in a Cell. Why not? Triple threat matches have become crutches for WWE to extend feuds. Rarely, if ever has a triple threat match been used as a feud-ender. Most of the time it's used to extend the current feud(i.e. Eve/Kaitlyn/Layla, Punk/Ryback/Cena, Cena/Punk/Big Show, Punk/Bryan/Kane, etc.) WWE loves using triple threat matches as tools to extend feuds. So,WWE going in the direction of a triple threat seems to indicate that regardless of the result, the current feud between AJ/Paige will continue.
|
|
Abdullah
Hank Scorpio
Thank you, Ishmeal Loves Bayley!
Posts: 6,420
|
Post by Abdullah on Aug 24, 2014 15:46:08 GMT -5
I don't see AJ/Paige extending to Hell in a Cell. Why not? Triple threat matches have become crutches for WWE to extend feuds. Rarely, if ever has a triple threat match been used as a feud-ender. Most of the time it's used to extend the current feud(i.e. Eve/Kaitlyn/Layla, Punk/Ryback/Cena, Cena/Punk/Big Show, Punk/Bryan/Kane, etc.) WWE loves using triple threat matches as tools to extend feuds. So,WWE going in the direction of a triple threat seems to indicate that regardless of the result, the current feud between AJ/Paige will continue. Why would it continue though, the feud itself? Four PPVs of PaiJ would be overkill. It should end at Night of Champions.
|
|
gl83
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,922
|
Post by gl83 on Aug 24, 2014 15:57:20 GMT -5
Why not? Triple threat matches have become crutches for WWE to extend feuds. Rarely, if ever has a triple threat match been used as a feud-ender. Most of the time it's used to extend the current feud(i.e. Eve/Kaitlyn/Layla, Punk/Ryback/Cena, Cena/Punk/Big Show, Punk/Bryan/Kane, etc.) WWE loves using triple threat matches as tools to extend feuds. So,WWE going in the direction of a triple threat seems to indicate that regardless of the result, the current feud between AJ/Paige will continue. Why would it continue though, the feud itself? Four PPVs of PaiJ would be overkill. It should end at Night of Champions. Probably the chaotic nature of the match, where the Heel in question can steal a win and thus retain their title, allowing the Face chasing that person to still have "a axe to grind with said Heel". Right now in terms of this feud AJ/Paige have yet to even get into 1st gear. I expected AJ/Paige to be more akin like Melina/Beth c. 2008 with brawls and whatnot, yet here we are, almost 3 months later and they are still "frenemies". Until we reach the point in the feud where AJ & Paige are enemies and not "frenemies", I don't see the end of this feud even being close to being in sight. Plus there's my gut feeling that Nikki Bella is probably going to be taking the Divas title sooner rather than later and them incorporating it into the current storyline with Brie and the Authority, thus they need a Face to take it off of. Hence, why I'm thinking that AJ takes the title off of Paige by the end of the feud and transitions the title onto Nikki.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2014 4:48:46 GMT -5
I'm getting this sinking feeling that they're going to have Cena / Lesnar be something like a cage match, where Lesnar throws Cena through the door then Rollins cashes in on him. I'm really hoping no part of that is true but I'm just feeling it in my gut, with Rollins losing the title back to Cena around Survivor Series to give him Flair's record then Cena dropping it to Lesnar at the Rumble.
|
|
|
Post by wildojinx on Aug 26, 2014 7:30:47 GMT -5
I get the feeling we'll have Cena winning by the skin of his teeth (ie, getting a rollup or something), then Rollins comes in and cashes in. This would lead to a Hell in the Cell between Rollins, Cena, Lesnar, and Ambrose, and that one could go any way really.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2014 23:58:04 GMT -5
So, Cena / Lesnar again, Sheamus / Cesaro again, Rhodes / Usos again, Paige / AJ again, Miz / Ziggler again...
They're sure stacking this card to get people to renew their Network subscriptions, aren't they? Then again, SummerSlam was the only good PPV in months, maybe they should go ahead with rehashing its entire card.
|
|
|
Post by Neo: "The One" who CLAPS on Aug 27, 2014 8:03:46 GMT -5
So, I wonder why the huge Reigns/HHH match that would've got everyone to renew their subscriptions is off the table for now? This PPV's card is looking to be the exact opposite of what they should have done.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2014 8:20:32 GMT -5
So, I wonder why the huge Reigns/HHH match that would've got everyone to renew their subscriptions is off the table for now? This PPV's card is looking to be the exact opposite of what they should have done. I'm kind of guessing that they decided to push that back for Hell in a Cell or Survivor Series, possibly just to try and give Reigns some more PPV singles experience first given the general reception of the Orton match. Still, the build for this show and apparent card are bizarre, yeah.
|
|
gl83
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,922
|
Post by gl83 on Aug 27, 2014 9:48:03 GMT -5
So, I wonder why the huge Reigns/HHH match that would've got everyone to renew their subscriptions is off the table for now? This PPV's card is looking to be the exact opposite of what they should have done. I'm kind of guessing that they decided to push that back for Hell in a Cell or Survivor Series, possibly just to try and give Reigns some more PPV singles experience first given the general reception of the Orton match. Still, the build for this show and apparent card are bizarre, yeah. Yeah. Last week we thought it was heading to Rusev vs Henry, Reigns vs Orton and Jericho vs Wyatt, now it appears to be Orton vs Jericho, Reigns/Rollins and Henry/Show vs Harper/Rowan
|
|
|
Post by Neo: "The One" who CLAPS on Aug 27, 2014 10:04:59 GMT -5
I'm kind of guessing that they decided to push that back for Hell in a Cell or Survivor Series, possibly just to try and give Reigns some more PPV singles experience first given the general reception of the Orton match. Still, the build for this show and apparent card are bizarre, yeah. Yeah. Last week we thought it was heading to Rusev vs Henry, Reigns vs Orton and Jericho vs Wyatt, now it appears to be Orton vs Jericho, Reigns/Rollins and Henry/Show vs Harper/Rowan If Henry/Show vs. Wyatt's is a PPV match, then I'm subscribing to the network just to cancel.
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Aug 28, 2014 8:55:14 GMT -5
Given that the filming for his movie ends just right before NoC, anyone think they make Reigns/Rollins into a tag match with Reigns & Ambrose vs. Rollins & Kane?
|
|
DjZonk
Don Corleone
Where's my cat?
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by DjZonk on Aug 29, 2014 8:17:44 GMT -5
Given that the filming for his movie ends just right before NoC, anyone think they make Reigns/Rollins into a tag match with Reigns & Ambrose vs. Rollins & Kane? Not for the PPV, but a tag match at somepoint down the road is a given I feel.
|
|
DjZonk
Don Corleone
Where's my cat?
Posts: 1,325
|
Post by DjZonk on Aug 30, 2014 9:39:57 GMT -5
I liked listening to Austin's podcast with him and Heyman basically talking in character for 15 minutes about the Cena / Lesnar rematch. Excellent stuff.
|
|