Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2014 19:27:36 GMT -5
f*** yeah, Bena!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2014 19:30:44 GMT -5
We...we don't talk about Bork anymore after the "incident."
|
|
Fiddleford H. McGucket
El Dandy
My Mind's been gone for 30-odd years! Can't Break what's already broken!
Posts: 8,748
|
Post by Fiddleford H. McGucket on Sept 20, 2014 19:30:52 GMT -5
Butch Deadlift! Thick McRunfast! Dirk Hardpec! Smoke man muscle, Roll fisslebeef, big Mclargehuge BOB JOHNSON!
|
|
|
Post by Kash Flagg on Sept 20, 2014 19:31:55 GMT -5
HAW HAW, now you all look like jerks.
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Sept 20, 2014 19:46:19 GMT -5
HAW HAW, now you all look like jerks.
|
|
Welfare Willis
Crow T. Robot
Pornomancer 555-BONE FDIC Bonsured
Game Center CX Kacho on!
Posts: 44,259
|
Post by Welfare Willis on Sept 20, 2014 20:33:33 GMT -5
HAW HAW, now you all look like jerks. Look like? LANGUAGE WARNING!
|
|
schma
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,705
|
Post by schma on Sept 21, 2014 3:36:37 GMT -5
If Cena wins it should be by DQ. They shouldn't waste Lesnar losing on Cena. It should be used to cement someone as a big deal. Plus at this point probably even Cena is tired of Cena with the title. Have him actually get some offence in with this match much like the match they had a couple years ago. That said Brock should walk out with the belt this time. Another Cena beatdown will be bad because it will probably lead to another round of Wyatt and midcard burials.
|
|
nisidhe
Hank Scorpio
O Superman....O judge....O Mom and Dad....
Posts: 5,719
|
Post by nisidhe on Sept 21, 2014 8:34:15 GMT -5
Let's be honest here - there are only a handful of wrestlers who can credibly beat Lesnar for the title and all of them were there when he was there the first time around. Of those, Show and Henry have already been on the losing end of beatdowns from Lesnar; Orton's a heel; Kane's a heel; Trips is both a heel and has taken beatdowns from Lesnar. There is nobody on the current roster who is in a position to step into the role of Lesnar-killer: all are either injured or heels without a plan for being turned face. Sheamus _might_ be able to step in credibly but he's not being booked strongly at the moment and there have been calls for him to turn heel.
Really, it's only Cena who has beaten Lesnar in the past three years; and the only one who could win and then lose on a cash-in. I'm calling it now for tonight: Cena beats Lesnar in something approaching a bloodbath, only to lose to Rollins on a cash-in. It's actually the best possible result given the current booking situation - Rollins then becomes an even bigger target for both Reigns and Ambrose; while Orton seethes with envy and teases a possible tweener turn. Cena gets to rest up; Lesnar goes hunting; Bryan continues his road to recovery; the Universe breathes a sigh of relief.
|
|
|
Post by Pgarodactyl on Sept 21, 2014 9:30:57 GMT -5
While there is a certain charm of having a heel champion with the faces chasing him, no. I don't want Cena to win.
|
|
The Unconquered Sun
King Koopa
He has no pants! What a heathen!
Lord of Storms and Kittens!
Posts: 11,548
|
Post by The Unconquered Sun on Sept 21, 2014 9:45:03 GMT -5
i do want Cena to win for the implosion/melt down/riot that the IWC would have.
|
|
|
Post by revolverjgw on Sept 21, 2014 9:51:09 GMT -5
Yeah, the meltdown would be entertaining. I'd rather Brock win, but if he loses there's still a lot to look forward to.
|
|
StuntGranny®
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Not Actually a Granny
Posts: 16,099
|
Post by StuntGranny® on Sept 21, 2014 10:48:12 GMT -5
As much as it pains me to say it, I hope Cena wins.
I don't like Cena or Brock, but I REALLY don't like Brock Lesnar or Paul Heyman. I think they're two of the most overrated wrestling figures to ever step foot in a ring (Certainly Lesnar). I'd love for Lesnar to lose so that he and Paul E. could fade away into the sunset, never to be seen again.
Not only that, I think Cena winning would make the future a little less predictable. At least then we're not totally convinced/it's not totally obvious that Lesnar's just keeping the title so that Roman Reigns can be crowned at WrestleMania.
My ideal scenario would be for Cena to win and then Rollins cashes in thanks to Russev attacking Cena after his match. Stick Cena in the inevitable program with Russev and let the other two guys go away for good. At least having Rollins as champion would feel fresh instead of one of two guys from yesteryear winning it yet again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2014 12:36:21 GMT -5
It helps that Brock has Heyman in his corner. A Benafactor if you will. Uhhh......where does that leave us?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2014 12:38:43 GMT -5
We...we don't talk about Bork anymore after the "incident." Which one? The one where he beat up Green Man?
|
|
|
Post by gnr123 on Sept 21, 2014 12:57:16 GMT -5
I know I don't. They could make Brock into a monster heel who beats everybody until someone (preferably Bryan) finally ends the "reign of terror." It's so simple and it writes itself. Unfortunately, WWE usually see's something that's so simple, and make it all complicated and ruined. Remember the Royal Rumble, when Batista won and EVERYBODY wanted Daniel Bryan to win? Don't put it past WWE to have Cena win tonight to be like "LOL, we trolled you."
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Sept 21, 2014 13:05:40 GMT -5
I want Cena to win because I think Brock is more useful as a mythical figure who is "above" championships. Brock Lesnar is money because he's Brock Lesnar. His presence should allow WWE to feel more comfortable with testing new talents in the title scene, or even just giving lower level talents a shot to be on TV without worrying about the ratings, attendance, etc. taking a nosedive. Everyone knows that Lesnar only wrestles "big" matches, so being in the ring with him is a big deal, title or no title. WWE can build more stars with "Brock Lesnar" and "The WWE World Heavyweight Championship" as two separate programs rather than "The WWE World Heavyweight Champion Brock Lesnar". I know I don't. They could make Brock into a monster heel who beats everybody until someone (preferably Bryan) finally ends the "reign of terror." It's so simple and it writes itself. Unfortunately, WWE usually see's something that's so simple, and make it all complicated and ruined. Remember the Royal Rumble, when Batista won and EVERYBODY wanted Daniel Bryan to win? Don't put it past WWE to have Cena win tonight to be like "LOL, we trolled you." That IS the ideal endgame, but the problem ever since Brock returned is that they're constantly wasting him on people who don't benefit from being in his presence. I'd love Bryan to topple Lesnar, and Reigns, if he were a bit more polished, wouldn't be a bad option either. But I want to see other younger talents "look good in defeat" against Lesnar in the build up to that endgame, rather than seeing him lift Big Show or Mark Henry over his head.
|
|
BK From WV
Hank Scorpio
Claims to have sense of humor, probably stole it
I'm Here
Posts: 5,610
|
Post by BK From WV on Sept 21, 2014 13:26:30 GMT -5
I do because I can't stand Lesnar. Simple as that. I would be fine with Cena winning and Rollins cashing in on him. As long as Lesnar doesn't have the belt. I may actually watch Raw tomorrow night for the first time in weeks if Lesnar loses. Now, he's not the sole reason I haven't been watching but I would be more interested if he didn't have the belt.
|
|
|
Post by gnr123 on Sept 21, 2014 13:26:40 GMT -5
I want Cena to win because I think Brock is more useful as a mythical figure who is "above" championships. Brock Lesnar is money because he's Brock Lesnar. His presence should allow WWE to feel more comfortable with testing new talents in the title scene, or even just giving lower level talents a shot to be on TV without worrying about the ratings, attendance, etc. taking a nosedive. Everyone knows that Lesnar only wrestles "big" matches, so being in the ring with him is a big deal, title or no title. WWE can build more stars with "Brock Lesnar" and "The WWE World Heavyweight Championship" as two separate programs rather than "The WWE World Heavyweight Champion Brock Lesnar". I know I don't. They could make Brock into a monster heel who beats everybody until someone (preferably Bryan) finally ends the "reign of terror." It's so simple and it writes itself. Unfortunately, WWE usually see's something that's so simple, and make it all complicated and ruined. Remember the Royal Rumble, when Batista won and EVERYBODY wanted Daniel Bryan to win? Don't put it past WWE to have Cena win tonight to be like "LOL, we trolled you." That IS the ideal endgame, but the problem ever since Brock returned is that they're constantly wasting him on people who don't benefit from being in his presence. I'd love Bryan to topple Lesnar, and Reigns, if he were a bit more polished, wouldn't be a bad option either. But I want to see other younger talents "look good in defeat" against Lesnar in the build up to that endgame, rather than seeing him lift Big Show or Mark Henry over his head. I understand what your saying, him facing someone like Cesaro or even someone like Ambrose would be cool. Wasting him on guys like Big Show or Mark Henry just because of "look at the strength of Lesnar!" is just useless.
|
|
|
Post by gnr123 on Sept 21, 2014 13:27:26 GMT -5
As much as it pains me to say it, I hope Cena wins. I don't like Cena or Brock, but I REALLY don't like Brock Lesnar or Paul Heyman. I think they're two of the most overrated wrestling figures to ever step foot in a ring (Certainly Lesnar). I'd love for Lesnar to lose so that he and Paul E. could fade away into the sunset, never to be seen again. Not only that, I think Cena winning would make the future a little less predictable. At least then we're not totally convinced/it's not totally obvious that Lesnar's just keeping the title so that Roman Reigns can be crowned at WrestleMania. My ideal scenario would be for Cena to win and then Rollins cashes in thanks to Russev attacking Cena after his match. Stick Cena in the inevitable program with Russev and let the other two guys go away for good. At least having Rollins as champion would feel fresh instead of one of two guys from yesteryear winning it yet again. I'm just curious, what about Lesnar is overrated?
|
|
schma
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,705
|
Post by schma on Sept 21, 2014 14:04:24 GMT -5
They could actually use Lesnar to restart Ryback's push. All he needs to do is jump them after the match, "the hunger is back!" or "the hunger is greater than ever!" Not saying it'd be a good idea but honestly I think if they separate Ryback from Axel, give him a couple wins against upper tier opponents and book him strong he'd be ready to leap up again in no time.
|
|