We've Gotta Protect That John Cena!

[Deleted]

Seriously, that ending... He has Lesnar completely helpless and basically on the verge of tapping, and Rollins interferes for no reason other than because they couldn't at all let Lesnar fight back and beat Cena twice in a row? Really?

Ugh. UGH. At least Rollins didn't blow the cash-in. Though he still looks like an idiot for not waiting to jump Cena after the match.

And I guess there goes the Rollins / Ambrose feud.

[thelonewolf527]

Yes they didn't want Lesnar to kill Cena twice in a row because they wanted to end this feud at Hell In A Cell and having Cena get destroyed again would have meant there'd be no reason to do the match again

[.]

I gave wwe an honest try for awhile because of how well Brock was booked.

I'm glad they killed that idea to preserve supercena.

[MGH]

I haven't watched Raw in three weeks and the only reason I turned this on was to watch Brock.

All I got was Cena getting in way too much, and then the announcers trying everything they could after the match was over to shatter the aura of invincibility they gave Lesnar with Mania and Summerslam by proclaiming that they all think Lesnar was about to lose.

This company has some of the f***ing stupidest people booking things I've ever seen in my life.

[misconduct was wrong]

I care so little about the product anymore that I just laughed at the stupidity.

[Lancers]

My biggest fear is coming true. Another Cena/Lesnar match.

[Kevin Hamilton]

Cole was pushing that "Was Brock gonna tap out or be pinned!!??" HARD.

But whatever, Brock's still champ, so I'm fine with it.

[Deleted]

Sept 21, 2014 21:47:35 GMT -5 thelonewolf527 said:

Yes they didn't want Lesnar to kill Cena twice in a row because they wanted to end this feud at Hell In A Cell and having Cena get destroyed again would have meant there'd be no reason to do the match again

Easy solution to that.

Don't do the match again! Lesnar's had roughly ten matches since coming back, why do four of them have to be with Cena?

[.]

Sept 21, 2014 21:47:35 GMT -5 thelonewolf527 said:

Yes they didn't want Lesnar to kill Cena twice in a row because they wanted to end this feud at Hell In A Cell and having Cena get destroyed again would have meant there'd be no reason to do the match again

Having Cena wrecked again would give him an easy out into his Russev feud while making whoever beats brocka big deal.

[Kevin Hamilton]

Sept 21, 2014 21:47:35 GMT -5 thelonewolf527 said:

Yes they didn't want Lesnar to kill Cena twice in a row because they wanted to end this feud at Hell In A Cell and having Cena get destroyed again would have meant there'd be no reason to do the match again

To be frank, there's not a reason to do any match 3 months in a row.

[thelonewolf527]

Sept 21, 2014 21:49:07 GMT -5 Lizuka #BLM said:

Sept 21, 2014 21:47:35 GMT -5 thelonewolf527 said:

Yes they didn't want Lesnar to kill Cena twice in a row because they wanted to end this feud at Hell In A Cell and having Cena get destroyed again would have meant there'd be no reason to do the match again

Easy solution to that.

Don't do the match again! Lesnar's had roughly ten matches since coming back, why do four of them have to be with Cena?

Well then let's see you come up with another opponent for Lesnar for Hell In A Cell that isn't Cena, and I guess isn't Big Show either since everyone here was up in arms about that one too.

Exactly, he doesn't exist.

[Deleted]

Sept 21, 2014 21:48:51 GMT -5 Kevin Hamilton said:

Cole was pushing that "Was Brock gonna tap out or be pinned!!??" HARD.

But whatever, Brock's still champ, so I'm fine with it.

Watched the tail-end of the match and that commentary was f***ing stupid because Cena was pinning Lesnar at the time.

[Sc]

Wow... Night of Champions ended early.

[thelonewolf527]

Sept 21, 2014 21:50:14 GMT -5 Kevin Hamilton said:

Sept 21, 2014 21:47:35 GMT -5 thelonewolf527 said:

Yes they didn't want Lesnar to kill Cena twice in a row because they wanted to end this feud at Hell In A Cell and having Cena get destroyed again would have meant there'd be no reason to do the match again

To be frank, there's not a reason to do any match 3 months in a row.

They did this last year with Bryan vs Orton so they'd end the feud in a more "big time" kind of a match instead of at Battleground. This is the same thing

[Kevin Hamilton]

Sept 21, 2014 21:51:24 GMT -5 thelonewolf527 said:

Sept 21, 2014 21:50:14 GMT -5 Kevin Hamilton said:

To be frank, there's not a reason to do any match 3 months in a row.

They did this last year with Bryan vs Orton so they'd end the feud in a more "big time" kind of a match instead of at Battleground. This is the same thing

Yes. And it was just as dumb.

[khali]

I'm glad Lesnar still has the title, but it is insulting to tell your viewers Lesnar was about to tap when we saw something completely different with our own eyes.

[Deleted]

Sept 21, 2014 21:49:11 GMT -5 . said:

Sept 21, 2014 21:47:35 GMT -5 thelonewolf527 said:

Yes they didn't want Lesnar to kill Cena twice in a row because they wanted to end this feud at Hell In A Cell and having Cena get destroyed again would have meant there'd be no reason to do the match again

Having Cena wrecked again would give him an easy out into his Russev feud while making whoever beats brocka big deal.

Yes, you would do that at Hell In A Cell. This month, you would have Cena and Lesnar face different people.

[Mozenrath]

Annoying, slightly, but eh. I really would prefer that they just had Lesnar beat him, but we're getting one of two outcomes.

1. Cena gets another match, which, while annoying, is really not that big a deal to me. Having Cena get beat clean 3 times in a row would be shitty booking.

2. Cena moves on to feuding with Rollins and is also out of Brock's hair, which I don't have a problem with.

I watched initially during the Attitude era. These kinds of endings were to be expected with just about every PPV, so meh, I've been there and done that. No point in getting that upset about it, to me.

[Xxcjb01xX [PIECE OF: SH-]]

Posting this here too:

In the end, all the highlights of this PPV are overshadowed by the fact that we are supposed to believe Cena is at Brocks level, when a month ago, it was established, cleanly, that he wasn't. But After a month of doing NOTHING but run his mouth, be a dick, and overall be the most unlikable piece of cancer in wrestling, Cena has to be screwed out of his victory with Lesnar.

F*** you WWE, this is the reason people hate what you've become. Any time you have anything that might be promising it is shoved aside for the status quo, and that is Cena, after nearly 10 years of it, we're all sick of it.

You're all a bunch of F***ing morons, I wish WCW had survived, because without competition, you've become more and more unbearable

/rant

[Shark]

Based on how Cena is booked, I'm 100% convinced that Vince thinks WWE will go under in a matter of days if he shows any weakness. It's like in his mind, if Cena loses twice or sells any of the beaten Brock gives him, the stock will plummet, merch sales will fall, attendance will drop. Hogan and Austin were not this protected and they are bigger draws than Cena ever has been.