|
Post by Oh Cry Me a Screwball on Oct 2, 2014 18:30:27 GMT -5
I'm reminded of that game with WCW clips playing in the background, and all of the hints that it's wrestling were WWF ones. That sums up TNA. "Preparation Triple H" might be the best clue in the history of the show, though.
|
|
|
Post by Bram wants to 'urt you on Oct 2, 2014 18:32:10 GMT -5
The most important thing about this years BFG is that it's the last BFG we'll get. Next year, it'll be called BFC - Broadcast From Campus. Along with the rest of TNA's programming.
|
|
ededdneddy
Hank Scorpio
ededdandembed
Posts: 5,697
|
Post by ededdneddy on Oct 11, 2014 12:44:24 GMT -5
BFG doesn't matter mostly because its a show comprised of Wrestle-1 stars. They might as well just make it a Wrestle-1 PPV featuring TNA
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2014 14:05:39 GMT -5
While I think the peak of BFG was from 2006-2008 (the years where I felt they did manage to capture that 'big fight feel' and had fairly good crowds), things had admittedly tailed off since then. All the same, I did think TNA managed to keep it as one of their stand-out shows even if not the top one. This year, though, man. It's a husk. Not even in terms of possible match quality; it's simply a BFG show in name only and not a shred of it is going to be meaningful to TNA in general. I agree. It's like TNA reached it's top tier with Angle's debut and jumped off of it headfirst with Hogan's.
|
|