WWEedy
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,320
|
Post by WWEedy on Nov 24, 2014 9:44:05 GMT -5
WWE World Heavyweight Championship Brock Lesnar (c) vs. John Cena
Tables, Ladders and Chairs Dean Ambrose vs. Bray Wyatt
Divas Title Handicap Match: If Brie is pinned, Nikki loses the title The Bella Twins (c) vs. AJ Lee
Dolph Ziggler vs. Big Show
WWE Tag Team Championship Ladder Match The Miz and Mizdow vs. The Dust Brothers
Rusev vs. Ryback
Tables Match Randy Orton vs. Seth Rollins
Intercontinental Championship Luke Harper (c) vs. Erick Rowan
|
|
|
Post by SCCB Was Told To Do Steroids on Nov 24, 2014 16:23:08 GMT -5
Will this Ambrose/Wyatt match be the Easter egg for aRoyal Rumble match?
|
|
rrg251
Don Corleone
Posts: 2,045
|
Post by rrg251 on Nov 25, 2014 15:58:29 GMT -5
Here's how I see it, if they have time:
Dean Ambrose vs. Bray Wyatt - TLC we know this one
Triple H vs. Dolph Ziggler - All or Nothing Triple H volunteers to fight the man who finished off The Authority at Survivor Series. Cena agrees to a stipulation where Triple H either regains power or doesn't have so much as a desk job in WWE
Seth Rollins vs. Randy Orton - Ladder Match for the MITB briefcase Orton will probably push the fact that this time last year he climbed a ladder to become the Unified Champion
John Cena vs. Big Show - Chairs Match Both men have good history in Chairs matches.
Ryback vs. Kane - All or Nothing Tables Match Kane can become a Superstar again, but only if he can beat Ryback in a Tables match.
Luke Harper vs. Erick Rowan - IC Title The former stable-mates collide one on one.
Rusev vs. Swagger - US Title I know we already did this feud this summer, but now it's for a title.
Miz and Mizdow vs. Dust Brothers - Tag Titles The former champions get their rematch without other teams involved.
|
|
|
Post by Clawley Race on Nov 25, 2014 19:22:05 GMT -5
I like that card a lot. HHH and Ziggler is the kind of match that would get me into the show and have a serious rooting interest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2014 6:58:25 GMT -5
I'm figuring the card's going to be something like...
Ambrose vs. Bray Harper vs. Ziggler Big Show vs. Rowan Cena vs. Rollins vs. Orton Kane vs. Ryback Swagger vs. Rusev AJ vs. Nikki Reigns vs. Henry
That last one is mostly because with him being due back before then I don't see them leaving Reigns off the card, and they can't really afford to tear Rollins away from Cena and Orton to feed to Reigns so might as well give him the World's Strongest Jobber to squash.
|
|
|
Post by Gravedigger's Biscuits on Nov 26, 2014 12:54:04 GMT -5
I'm figuring the card's going to be something like... Ambrose vs. Bray Harper vs. Ziggler Big Show vs. Rowan Cena vs. Rollins vs. Orton Kane vs. Ryback Swagger vs. Rusev AJ vs. Nikki Reigns vs. Henry That last one is mostly because with him being due back before then I don't see them leaving Reigns off the card, and they can't really afford to tear Rollins away from Cena and Orton to feed to Reigns so might as well give him the World's Strongest Jobber to squash. Reigns said he'd be back in a month at Survivor Series. That would be approximately December 23 - TLC is on the 14th. I don't think him (or Orton for that matter) will be back before then. Other than that, I agree that's the likely card.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2014 15:20:42 GMT -5
New poster
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2014 19:24:46 GMT -5
Usually, to me, TLC is the laziest PPV on WWE's calendar. The production, the matches, the promos...
But, this year looks to be very good. And I don't care about pinfalls & submissions in a TLC match; The Shield vs. Team Hell No & Ryback tore the house down and it's a shame it happened in December, where those matches never make it into Best of This Year DVDs.
I'm just saying we might have a miracle on our hands with Ambrose and Wyatt.
|
|
|
Post by Oh Cry Me a Screwball on Nov 26, 2014 20:22:57 GMT -5
TLC usually makes for a good PPV outing, if only because WWE is smart enough to use all the no DQ matches to cover for most people's faults and accentuate their strengths. Take Morrison vs Sheamus for example.
The worst one was last year's, and it's the one where they just had the one TLC match.
|
|
Bang Bang Bart
Ozymandius
The King of North America
Posts: 60,543
Member is Online
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Nov 26, 2014 20:26:08 GMT -5
TLC usually makes for a good PPV outing, if only because WWE is smart enough to use all the no DQ matches to cover for most people's faults and accentuate their strengths. Take Morrison vs Sheamus for example. The worst one was last year's, and it's the one where they just had the one TLC match. And unfortunately, that one TLC match featured a match up everyone is sick of: Cena vs. Orton.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2014 2:27:23 GMT -5
TLC usually makes for a good PPV outing, if only because WWE is smart enough to use all the no DQ matches to cover for most people's faults and accentuate their strengths. Take Morrison vs Sheamus for example. The worst one was last year's, and it's the one where they just had the one TLC match. Everything about Morrison / Sheamus is bizarre. It was two guys who are damn good in the ring (though Sheamus was probably at his worst run of ring work as part of the WWE roster) who both had momentum and have dynamics that fit well with each other, but the feud itself was so forced and badly written that there really was no reason to care and most of the matches were underwhelming. And yet, that one night they put on a damn clinic. Anyone who wants to know how to effectively book someone like Sheamus should just watch that match and follow it to the letter, because even in losing clean he looks like a completely unstoppable beast there. But yeah, when it's being done right with the assorted random gimmicks - which it looks like this year will do unlike last year - TLC tends to be a great show. 2012's comes to mind, where even a match featuring Sandow, Rey during his most busted period, and original flavor Sin Cara is a hell of a lot of fun.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2014 13:12:11 GMT -5
Twice this year, WWE has come to my hometown of Cleveland, and there's been a fresh situation in which I don't want to give them my money. First was the Raw after the Rumble, with the obvious Batista getting shit on/no Bryan in the Rumble situation. I had already bought a ticket to Raw before the Bryan deal, I went that night but felt so empty that I told myself I would never attend another live event. But WWE did correct their mistake with Bryan, I got the Network, cool beans. When they started running commercials for TLC I thought "YES, I'm going." as I've only attended one PPV before (Mania 28). But I waited, for some reason. And now that Punk did that tell-all interview, f*** no they're not getting $100 from me. I feel crappy even giving them money for the Network.
|
|
WWEedy
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,320
|
Post by WWEedy on Nov 28, 2014 14:57:11 GMT -5
Twice this year, WWE has come to my hometown of Cleveland, and there's been a fresh situation in which I don't want to give them my money. First was the Raw after the Rumble, with the obvious Batista getting shit on/no Bryan in the Rumble situation. I had already bought a ticket to Raw before the Bryan deal, I went that night but felt so empty that I told myself I would never attend another live event. But WWE did correct their mistake with Bryan, I got the Network, cool beans. When they started running commercials for TLC I thought "YES, I'm going." as I've only attended one PPV before (Mania 28). But I waited, for some reason. And now that Punk did that tell-all interview, f*** no they're not getting $100 from me. I feel crappy even giving them money for the Network. I've never got this mindset. There's two sides to every story, always. Why in the world would you deprive yourself of going to a show where you'll have a lot of fun, see some of your favorite wrestlers live and probably have a real good time because as an employer they were apparently shitty to one of their employees? I think it's pretty ridiculous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2014 15:27:50 GMT -5
Twice this year, WWE has come to my hometown of Cleveland, and there's been a fresh situation in which I don't want to give them my money. First was the Raw after the Rumble, with the obvious Batista getting shit on/no Bryan in the Rumble situation. I had already bought a ticket to Raw before the Bryan deal, I went that night but felt so empty that I told myself I would never attend another live event. But WWE did correct their mistake with Bryan, I got the Network, cool beans. When they started running commercials for TLC I thought "YES, I'm going." as I've only attended one PPV before (Mania 28). But I waited, for some reason. And now that Punk did that tell-all interview, f*** no they're not getting $100 from me. I feel crappy even giving them money for the Network. I've never got this mindset. There's two sides to every story, always. Why in the world would you deprive yourself of going to a show where you'll have a lot of fun, see some of your favorite wrestlers live and probably have a real good time because as an employer they were apparently shitty to one of their employees? I think it's pretty ridiculous. In this situation, money is my voice. By giving WWE money, I support their decision-making and treatment of talent. I don't wish to do that. I know I know, drop in the bucket doesn't matter. But, if everyone felt like their voice didn't matter, and no one did anything, nothing would ever change anywhere. I also believe strongly in the principle of negative reinforcement. And that is stronger than my urge to attend TLC.
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Nov 28, 2014 15:45:17 GMT -5
Twice this year, WWE has come to my hometown of Cleveland, and there's been a fresh situation in which I don't want to give them my money. First was the Raw after the Rumble, with the obvious Batista getting shit on/no Bryan in the Rumble situation. I had already bought a ticket to Raw before the Bryan deal, I went that night but felt so empty that I told myself I would never attend another live event. But WWE did correct their mistake with Bryan, I got the Network, cool beans. When they started running commercials for TLC I thought "YES, I'm going." as I've only attended one PPV before (Mania 28). But I waited, for some reason. And now that Punk did that tell-all interview, f*** no they're not getting $100 from me. I feel crappy even giving them money for the Network. Maybe that's for the best. This PPV is full of scrubs and a scrub is a guy that can't get no love from me. I just hope you stick your ground and don't go chasing waterfalls. Please stick to the rivers and the lakes that you are used to. Whatever you do, don't creep and look an illegal stream.
|
|
|
Post by Mid-Carder on Nov 28, 2014 15:47:20 GMT -5
Twice this year, WWE has come to my hometown of Cleveland, and there's been a fresh situation in which I don't want to give them my money. First was the Raw after the Rumble, with the obvious Batista getting shit on/no Bryan in the Rumble situation. I had already bought a ticket to Raw before the Bryan deal, I went that night but felt so empty that I told myself I would never attend another live event. But WWE did correct their mistake with Bryan, I got the Network, cool beans. When they started running commercials for TLC I thought "YES, I'm going." as I've only attended one PPV before (Mania 28). But I waited, for some reason. And now that Punk did that tell-all interview, f*** no they're not getting $100 from me. I feel crappy even giving them money for the Network. Maybe that's for the best. This PPV is full of scrubs and a scrub is a guy that can't get no love from me. I just hope you stick your ground and don't go chasing waterfalls. Please stick to the rives and the lakes that you are used to. Whatever you do, don't creep and look an illegal stream. With all those tables, ladders and chairs, somebody will be made Unpretty
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2014 16:00:26 GMT -5
Hahaha.
I quiet, you guys are too funny.
|
|
Krazee
Salacious Crumb
Posts: 71,547
|
Post by Krazee on Nov 28, 2014 21:40:01 GMT -5
Daniel Bryan just announced
Kane vs The Ryback in a chairs match at TLC
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2014 21:43:08 GMT -5
Would love Rollins vs Ziggler for the MITB Briefcase in the events Ladder Match. Would be insane... Ambrose vs Wyatt TLC Ziggler vs Rollins Ladder Match for the MITB Cena vs Lesnar WWE Championship Tables Match Harper vs Rowan Chairs Match IC Title Ryback vs Big Show - Revenge of Team Cena against Show Plus 3 more matches. Russev match, tag match and divas match I'm thinking you're pretty much spot on, except for maybe the Cena/Lesnar match. I was going to post almost exactly the same thing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2014 23:17:35 GMT -5
Daniel Bryan just announced Kane vs The Ryback in a chairs match at TLC Big Show chair or no thanks
|
|