|
|
Post by Sumbody Gon' Get Dey Kneelift on Jan 2, 2015 16:46:46 GMT -5
Everyone has been talking about the coolest version of the finale of mania; that being, I agree, that Bryan defeats Brock only to be cashed in on by Rollins.
However, under what scenario do you imagine this happening, and with what result?
I personally would love it if Rollins attacked only to be F5'd by Brock and stopped, at least until the next night's Raw. I like the idea of Brock finally respecting someone as his last act in the company, but then, I'm a sucker for "guys hugging" stuff in wrestling
|
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Jan 2, 2015 16:50:09 GMT -5
I suggest 5 minutes into the match that Rollins cashes in making it a Triple Threat and steals a win from Bryan after Bryan hits Lesnar with the knee. Rollins for good measure hits the curbstomp on Lesnar and pins him.
|
|
Professor Chaos
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Bringer of Destruction and Maker of Doom
Posts: 16,332
|
Post by Professor Chaos on Jan 2, 2015 16:53:52 GMT -5
It would somehow end with Big Show Main Eventing Extreme Rules.
|
|
Marty McFry
Don Corleone
"She was mine before she was yours.... Wooooo"
Posts: 1,657
|
Post by Marty McFry on Jan 2, 2015 16:54:33 GMT -5
I suggest 5 minutes into the match that Rollins cashes in making it a Triple Threat and steals a win from Bryan after Bryan hits Lesnar with the knee. Rollins for good measure hits the curbstomp on Lesnar and pins him. I like this. |
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Jan 2, 2015 17:09:08 GMT -5
I'm of the mind that Rollins fails his cash in, if only due to have a scenario where karma finally catches up to him and makes him pay dearly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Jan 2, 2015 17:09:33 GMT -5
I suggest 5 minutes into the match that Rollins cashes in making it a Triple Threat and steals a win from Bryan after Bryan hits Lesnar with the knee. Rollins for good measure hits the curbstomp on Lesnar and pins him. Why would Rollins be that stupid? Instead of a 50/50 shot or better because of wear, tear and injury he makes things harder on himself. Makes no sense. If it is going to happen, just have Bryan beat Brock and then Rollins can attack and win. And no faking the cash in or having him get run off either. Just makes things worse, IMO. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2015 17:17:37 GMT -5
Man, I hate MITB. I absolutely don't want to see Bryan win the title again, only to have Rollins cash in. I hate the cash in thing period. In my eyes, if the person doesn't win a title in an actual match, the whole run is tainted from the start. So now, the person who won the title is starting the reign behind the 8 ball and playing catch up.
I know it's a heel thing to cash-in on a weakened opponent, but it's still way too weak for me. Have the heel win the title by cheating, like a real scumbag man.
|
|
schma
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 6,726
Member is Online
|
Post by schma on Jan 2, 2015 17:58:44 GMT -5
Yeah after Bryan had two runs that were screwed over right out of the gate, adding a third seems a bit much. I don't think Bryan pulling a show and winning the belt just to lose it a couple minutes later would be a good idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by sunnytaker on Jan 2, 2015 18:35:25 GMT -5
i'm of the school that rollins cashes in pre mania and it's bryan/rollins for the belt so brock and reigns can fight without the title being involved.
|
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Jan 2, 2015 18:52:53 GMT -5
Why would Rollins be that stupid? Instead of a 50/50 shot or better because of wear, tear and injury he makes things harder on himself. Makes no sense. If it is going to happen, just have Bryan beat Brock and then Rollins can attack and win. And no faking the cash in or having him get run off either. Just makes things worse, IMO. First off, I don't even like the MITB gimmick that much because almost every single cash in follows the same formula. God forbid that kayfabe be f***ed for a single moment, especially given that Rollins is successful in doing so. But let's just assume that Rollins did such a thing because every other run in cash in didn't work because the person was on alert...or maybe he didn't want to directly cash in on Lesnar because Lesnar isn't to be f***ed with at any time. By making it a triple threat, he can gain instant gratification by allowing Bryan to do the dirty work for him, as opposed to waiting until afterward. It's not stupid. Hell, in a triple threat you can't get counted out, so he could very well cash in from the stage entrance and wait for an opportunity to arise. At least that's say...DIFFERENT? And no, I'd rather Bryan not win, only to get cashed in on immediately. We've seen that before...and it's old. Bryan doesn't constantly need to have his rewards ripped from him in a way that is still legally abiding by the MITB contract. Instead, having Rollins steal Bryan's win over Lesnar AND the title helps motivate Bryan even more because Rollins cheated Bryan out of the chance to beat the beast. |
|
|
|
Post by benstudd on Jan 2, 2015 20:03:26 GMT -5
I have the feeling Rollins will cash in at the Rumble between Cena and Brock only to be stopped by Sting. And this time the case is used and Rollins cannot have a title match via the case ever again. Just so HHH is mad in a "not again" way and you get Hunter-Sting at Mania. Cause the way it ended with Orton, you'll probably get Rollins vs Orton at Mania.
|
|
Allie Kitsune
Crow T. Robot
Always Feelin' Foxy.
Celestial Princess in Exile.
Posts: 46,087 
|
Post by Allie Kitsune on Jan 2, 2015 21:24:57 GMT -5
Why would Rollins be that stupid? Instead of a 50/50 shot or better because of wear, tear and injury he makes things harder on himself. Makes no sense. If it is going to happen, just have Bryan beat Brock and then Rollins can attack and win. And no faking the cash in or having him get run off either. Just makes things worse, IMO. First off, I don't even like the MITB gimmick that much because almost every single cash in follows the same formula. God forbid that kayfabe be f***ed for a single moment, especially given that Rollins is successful in doing so. But let's just assume that Rollins did such a thing because every other run in cash in didn't work because the person was on alert...or maybe he didn't want to directly cash in on Lesnar because Lesnar isn't to be f***ed with at any time. By making it a triple threat, he can gain instant gratification by allowing Bryan to do the dirty work for him, as opposed to waiting until afterward. It's not stupid. Hell, in a triple threat you can't get counted out, so he could very well cash in from the stage entrance and wait for an opportunity to arise. At least that's say...DIFFERENT? And no, I'd rather Bryan not win, only to get cashed in on immediately. We've seen that before...and it's old. Bryan doesn't constantly need to have his rewards ripped from him in a way that is still legally abiding by the MITB contract. Instead, having Rollins steal Bryan's win over Lesnar AND the title helps motivate Bryan even more because Rollins cheated Bryan out of the chance to beat the beast. Or, the Ultimate Anti-climax... Lesnar beats the piss out of Bryan, but Bryan has got his shots in and caused Lesnar to overexert himself, making him vulnerable and actually getting him tired and down. Rollins sprints to the ring, cashes in while both are down, curbstomps both, pins Lesnar, spends the next _x_ amount of time bragging that he Slayed the Beast. |
|
|
|
Post by Brother Nero....Wolfe on Jan 2, 2015 21:27:36 GMT -5
I just want Rollings to emerge from inside the ring like Kane for the most hilarious cash in possible at some point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Milkman Norm on Jan 2, 2015 22:01:49 GMT -5
Scenario four with this cavet: Ambrose runs in AFTER THE BELL RINGS leading to a dq so Rollins loses the briefcase.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jan 3, 2015 1:01:23 GMT -5
Definitely the scenario with Brock foiling the cash in.
It'd be a nice gesture of respect towards Bryan.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Jan 3, 2015 1:05:57 GMT -5
Definitely the scenario with Brock foiling the cash in. It'd be a nice gesture of respect towards Bryan. As long as they don't overdo it with Brock shaking hands and palling around with Bryan. Just have him F5 Rollins and walk off to leave Bryan in his victorious moment. |
|
|
|
Post by thelonewolf527 on Jan 3, 2015 1:56:21 GMT -5
The option that's winning is just...dumb
|
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Jan 3, 2015 2:09:10 GMT -5
Definitely the scenario with Brock foiling the cash in. It'd be a nice gesture of respect towards Bryan. As long as they don't overdo it with Brock shaking hands and palling around with Bryan. Just have him F5 Rollins and walk off to leave Bryan in his victorious moment. Yep, that's it. Simple and understated. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2015 2:20:20 GMT -5
I wouldn't just have Ambrose foil him - I'd have the whole non-Authority roster do it as a whole, as one final act to end that plot after Sting's removed Triple H from power earlier in the night. Like have Rollins run out to do it but before the match actually starts practically an army of people run out, Bryan lays him out, and the Mania 10 celebration plays out from there. Then Rollins can get his successful cash-in a few months later or something.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bang Bang Bart on Jan 3, 2015 13:37:35 GMT -5
I wouldn't just have Ambrose foil him - I'd have the whole non-Authority roster do it as a whole, as one final act to end that plot after Sting's removed Triple H from power earlier in the night. Like have Rollins run out to do it but before the match actually starts practically an army of people run out, Bryan lays him out, and the Mania 10 celebration plays out from there. Then Rollins can get his successful cash-in a few months later or something. I'd have Ambrose be front and centre of the face contingent as well. |
|
