Should they make intergender Tag Titles?

[Professor Chaos]

We got Triple H & Steph, Cena & Nikki, Bryan & Brie, Tyson & Natalya, Jimmy Uso & Natalya, Cameron & Vinny, Eva and what's his name. Sounds fun.

[Mozenrath]

Nah. I do kind of like the idea of something like a King and Queen of Wrestling tourney, or some other such gimmick as a one-off, but I don't think an ongoing title would be good, since we have enough belts as it stands, and they wouldn't likely support it much. Think like when TNA added the Knockout Tag Titles and did dick-all with it for the most part.

[EyeofTyr]

Honestly, I would just make it a thing for the current tag titles, as opposed to making new ones.

Make it so a team of men, a team of women, or a team of a man & a woman can challenge for them.

It would shake things up a bit & definitely give us some fresh match-ups.

[CATCH_US IS the Conversation]

Three of those couples would be above that if it existed

[Hit Girl]

No, because the normal application of tag team wrestling would be impossible. You can't have hot tags, face in peril etc...It would break up the flow of a match to always have automatic tag outs when a man and a woman were in the ring together.

[sonofblaine]

No.

1. They can't handle the titles they do have.

2. Current intergender rules slow the match and make it very boring with the forced tags to keep it male vs male/female vs female

3. Even if they did let males wrestle females, there aren't enough Divas with the talent to hang with guys, and the ones who can should be in the Divas Title run, not wasted on a novelty belt.

[Deleted]

Feb 28, 2015 4:53:05 GMT -5 Hit Girl said:

No, because the normal application of tag team wrestling would be impossible. You can't have hot tags, face in peril etc...It would break up the flow of a match to always have automatic tag outs when a man and a woman were in the ring together.

Feb 28, 2015 5:08:15 GMT -5 sonofblaine said:

2. Current intergender rules slow the match and make it very boring with the forced tags to keep it male vs male/female vs female

You guys are confusing Mixed Tag Team matches with Intergender Tag Team matches.
"Mixed" is where it has to be male vs. male and female vs. female.
"Intergender" can be male vs female.

The OP asked if they should make Intergender Tag Titles... and the answer is no, because the WWE won't (can't?) do intergender violence like that since they switched to PG.  So it's a no before we even get into the very legitimate reasons everyone else has already brought up.

[Mid-Carder]

It might give some lower-card guys and some underused women something to do. It couldn't be any worse than the main event scene.

[Hit Girl]

Feb 28, 2015 5:29:01 GMT -5 @laveyan said:

Feb 28, 2015 4:53:05 GMT -5 Hit Girl said:

No, because the normal application of tag team wrestling would be impossible. You can't have hot tags, face in peril etc...It would break up the flow of a match to always have automatic tag outs when a man and a woman were in the ring together.

Feb 28, 2015 5:08:15 GMT -5 sonofblaine said:

2. Current intergender rules slow the match and make it very boring with the forced tags to keep it male vs male/female vs female

You guys are confusing Mixed Tag Team matches with Intergender Tag Team matches.
"Mixed" is where it has to be male vs. male and female vs. female.
"Intergender" can be male vs female.

The OP asked if they should make Intergender Tag Titles... and the answer is no, because the WWE won't (can't?) do intergender violence like that since they switched to PG.  So it's a no before we even get into the very legitimate reasons everyone else has already brought up.

There's very little real difference. Either way, they can't wrestle each other.

[Wolf Hawkfield no1 NZ poster]

No they shouldn't.

[Deleted]

Feb 28, 2015 5:35:48 GMT -5 Hit Girl said:

Feb 28, 2015 5:29:01 GMT -5 @laveyan said:

You guys are confusing Mixed Tag Team matches with Intergender Tag Team matches.
"Mixed" is where it has to be male vs. male and female vs. female.
"Intergender" can be male vs female.

The OP asked if they should make Intergender Tag Titles... and the answer is no, because the WWE won't (can't?) do intergender violence like that since they switched to PG.  So it's a no before we even get into the very legitimate reasons everyone else has already brought up.

There's very little real difference. Either way, they can't wrestle each other.

True, point was though that they'd technically be allowed to within the rules of an Intergender match, WWE just wouldn't let them.

[Starshine]

No, it would be pointless.

Considering they have a strict no male/female violence rule the matches would be pretty dull.

[cityboy]

I'd say yes because I like the idea but no because they end up people in there that should be used for something better.

[auph10imitated]

The only time this was ever plausible was in 2000:

HHH & Stephanie
Chyna & Eddie Guerrero
Tori & X-Pac (Road Dogg)
Lita & Matt Hardy (Jeff Hardy)
Terri & Perry Saturn
Ivory & RTC
Trish Stratus & T&A
Jacqueline & The APA
Molly Holly & The Hollys

Stick The Kat with Too Cool and every female they had was paired up with a guy.

[Digital Witness]

In order for this idea to work, they would need The World's Cutest Tag Team which they currently don't have on the roster.

It would be worth it if we got Joey Ryan yelling "Who wants a moustache ride?!" on Total Divas.

[Confused Mark Wahlberg]

I prefer they have a mixed doubles team instead

[sabretooth]

Only if the call the titles the Andy Kaufman Memorial Tag Titles.

[gr1990]

There's not been a single good intergender tag match in WWE since the 'guys fight guys, girls fight girls' rule came in, so no.

[RIHT]

If anything, I'd say just make the normal tag titles open to any gender or something if they wanted to do something like this.

[Jiren]

A one off tourny would be cool, and the winners get a trophy/plaque

As an ongoing, nah