|
Post by ritt works hard fo da chickens on Mar 9, 2015 23:46:33 GMT -5
Metsever4FAN name already taken?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2015 23:54:34 GMT -5
Metsever4FAN name already taken? Dolphins1925 must have been gone as well.
|
|
cait
Trap-Jaw
Posts: 376
|
Post by cait on Mar 10, 2015 6:54:52 GMT -5
Honestly, I think I was a bit too harsh here, so I edited this post. I do want to say that if you have insider knowledge or not, the way you come off with these little bits of knowledge leaves a lot to be desired and comes off badly. People act weird and jealous when there's no need to. I can't win. I am just relaying information I've heard nothing more. I did hint about the Briscoes strongly on here last week and I said hours after Joe announced he was leaving TNA that he was NXT bound.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2015 10:39:57 GMT -5
I can't reveal my sources (I'll just call him Scott), but he indicated a strong possibility that Joe is fat.
|
|
Abdullah
Hank Scorpio
Thank you, Ishmeal Loves Bayley!
Posts: 6,420
|
Post by Abdullah on Mar 11, 2015 9:04:52 GMT -5
If the Briscoes get signed and with Corbin being depushed, can we amend the 'WWE is looking for a look' talk to just mostly be about Roman Reigns?
|
|
|
Post by HMARK Center on Mar 11, 2015 9:19:22 GMT -5
Honestly, I think I was a bit too harsh here, so I edited this post. I do want to say that if you have insider knowledge or not, the way you come off with these little bits of knowledge leaves a lot to be desired and comes off badly. People act weird and jealous when there's no need to. I can't win. I am just relaying information I've heard nothing more. I did hint about the Briscoes strongly on here last week and I said hours after Joe announced he was leaving TNA that he was NXT bound. You "can't win" because you are providing zero evidence of your "status". You mentioned on the last page "I broke the news about the Briscoes elsewhere". Ok, where? If you broke the news, then you don't have to worry about it leaking because, by your own admission, the news is already broken. Show where you reported it, then we'll see if they've truly signed; if so, hurrah, if not, then maybe your info was wrong. You can't just waltz in and say things, provide no source, provide no article or body of work you've written, and demand people take you seriously. I know that journalism demands protection of sources, and that's fine, but you're not even presenting a body of work.
|
|
|
Post by The Legendary Ring Troll {BLM} on Mar 11, 2015 11:58:21 GMT -5
People act weird and jealous when there's no need to. I can't win. I am just relaying information I've heard nothing more. I did hint about the Briscoes strongly on here last week and I said hours after Joe announced he was leaving TNA that he was NXT bound. You "can't win" because you are providing zero evidence of your "status". You mentioned on the last page "I broke the news about the Briscoes elsewhere". Ok, where? If you broke the news, then you don't have to worry about it leaking because, by your own admission, the news is already broken. Show where you reported it, then we'll see if they've truly signed; if so, hurrah, if not, then maybe your info was wrong. You can't just waltz in and say things, provide no source, provide no article or body of work you've written, and demand people take you seriously. I know that journalism demands protection of sources, and that's fine, but you're not even presenting a body of work. I'm not a MOD, so please delete this if I'm out of line, but it does come across as slightly arrogant with the "I said this days ago" and "I broke this news somewhere else," like you're gloating. If you did, that's great, but pointing it out later like "I did it first! See!" just seems unnecessary.
|
|
cait
Trap-Jaw
Posts: 376
|
Post by cait on Mar 11, 2015 12:16:54 GMT -5
Honestly, I think I was a bit too harsh here, so I edited this post. I do want to say that if you have insider knowledge or not, the way you come off with these little bits of knowledge leaves a lot to be desired and comes off badly. Mainly as it is met with passive aggression and weird jealously. People act weird and jealous when there's no need to. I can't win. I am just relaying information I've heard nothing more. I did hint about the Briscoes strongly on here last week and I said hours after Joe announced he was leaving TNA that he was NXT bound. You "can't win" because you are providing zero evidence of your "status". You mentioned on the last page "I broke the news about the Briscoes elsewhere". Ok, where? If you broke the news, then you don't have to worry about it leaking because, by your own admission, the news is already broken. Show where you reported it, then we'll see if they've truly signed; if so, hurrah, if not, then maybe your info was wrong. You can't just waltz in and say things, provide no source, provide no article or body of work you've written, and demand people take you seriously. I know that journalism demands protection of sources, and that's fine, but you're not even presenting a body of work. Why do I need status it is 2015? I am sorry I don't have a typewriter or a newzsite. How many listicles do I have to create on Bleacher Report or how much of the Observer do I have to copy and paste on Inquister to achieve this mythical status. I am not a journalist either. Never claimed to be. I am not DEMANDING to be taken seriously either. Just fairly take me at my track record for accuracy on this forum.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew is Good on Mar 11, 2015 12:23:41 GMT -5
The Briscoes going in is a great idea as I brought up in the WWE looking at the indies thread. They've been there forever and need something fresh.
And I did hear that on MLW, and to defend them and Court, he called Spike dumping TNA due to changing the style of their channel a year before it happened.
|
|
cait
Trap-Jaw
Posts: 376
|
Post by cait on Mar 11, 2015 12:34:46 GMT -5
The Briscoes going in is a great idea as I brought up in the WWE looking at the indies thread. They've been there forever and need something fresh. And I did hear that on MLW, and to defend them and Court, he called Spike dumping TNA due to changing the style of their channel a year before it happened. Court is definitely in the know. But I posted about the Briscoes going to NXT before Court put up that podcast. Also SPIKE rebranding had talked about for years and then dumping SPIKE was talked about in the Observer for a while. I heard about the Briscoes March 1st.
|
|
|
Post by Raskovnik on Mar 11, 2015 14:44:14 GMT -5
My issue is you barge into every damn thread, act like a smarmy know-it-all, then play martyr when everyone gives you shit. You mentioned it's 2015, for whatever f***ing reason, as if that's proof enough for us to go "You know what, you're right, I'll take you at your word." No, it's 2015, and the majority of people are hopefully past the naive days of believing whatever any Tom, Dick, or Jane writes online and taking it as gospel, ESPECIALLY in a community like the wrestling community where everything gets so f***ing twisted and creating "news" is as easy as coming up with a salacious rumor or throwing out bait that confirms people's beliefs and it'll spread like wildfire. You have literally as much credibility as my uncle who works at Nintendo until proven otherwise, and even if you ARE legit, I'm not going to apologize because you should really learn how to carry yourself better.
|
|
cait
Trap-Jaw
Posts: 376
|
Post by cait on Mar 11, 2015 14:55:10 GMT -5
When the passive aggressiveness eases off and the OTT claims about me and what I think I supposedly am stop. Just take an open mind. Go by my posts and what I say that's all I ask.
For someone without creditbility I did post about Demott losing power in NXT & Briscoes and Joe going to NXT before other outlets. I am sorry but I did.
|
|
|
Post by Kevin Hamilton on Mar 11, 2015 17:10:49 GMT -5
It's not passive aggressive to ask for a source or any reason for any credibility. That doesn't just go for you, that's anyone peddling information they want people to take seriously.
Otherwise, you and anyone else appear to just be guessing or wanting people to take you on faith.
As is, at this point you're some dude on the internet. I'm not saying that to insult, just saying it cuz, well sans any sort of proof/sources that's true. Not trying to slam ya with that either; it'd be just the same if I was posting stuff with no basis for people to believe it. Though if I was doing it, it's under my real name, so it'd a)be easier to verify one way or another and b)a much bigger risk for me potentially looking foolish.
Something like the Demott thing isn't that much of a Deep Throat (Nixon, not Lovelace) moment either, given that it could be inferred that WWE might distance themselves from him once the Reddit story came out.
|
|
|
Post by ritt works hard fo da chickens on Mar 11, 2015 17:16:06 GMT -5
When the passive aggressiveness eases off and the OTT claims about me and what I think I supposedly am stop. Just take an open mind. Go by my posts and what I say that's all I ask. For someone without creditbility I did post about Demott losing power in NXT & Briscoes and Joe going to NXT before other outlets. I am sorry but I did. You also posted DeMott was just the type of guy HHH wanted. That he was immune from losing anything from the allegation. People ride Meltzer for taking vague middle of the road stances all the time. And he comes off far less sanctimonious and doesn't play the martyr when called on his screw ups. Maybe you don't mean to sound that way but if everyone is telling you something maybe there is something to it. Triple H personally hired Demott. Triple H wanted a drill sargent type that would weed people out. Nothing will likely come of this. There's way worse stories than these.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,272
|
Post by Mozenrath on Mar 11, 2015 17:30:19 GMT -5
That and I'm still waiting on that Becky Lynch title run.
|
|
Phil Parent
El Dandy
Your Favourite Teacher
Posts: 8,508
|
Post by Phil Parent on Mar 11, 2015 17:37:10 GMT -5
Joe will be brought in to feud with Reigns as Heyman Guy II after Brock retains at WM (and re-signs with WWE).
The story will be centered around the fact that Joe feels overlooked because he is not from the right "right" tribe of Samoa. He will be mostly fed to Reigns and then have a midcard role.
Source: A Jar Of Mayonnaise.
|
|
|
Post by angryfan on Mar 11, 2015 17:42:55 GMT -5
Joe will be brought in to feud with Reigns as Heyman Guy II after Brock retains at WM (and re-signs with WWE). The story will be centered around the fact that Joe feels overlooked because he is not from the right "right" tribe of Samoa. He will be mostly fed to Reigns and then have a midcard role. Source: A Jar Of Mayonnaise. I'd believe that if the source was Patty Mayonnaise, but a jar just won't cut it for me.
|
|
cait
Trap-Jaw
Posts: 376
|
Post by cait on Mar 11, 2015 17:56:29 GMT -5
You also posted DeMott was just the type of guy HHH wanted. That he was immune from losing anything from the allegation. I never said he was immune from losing anything. At least accurately reflect what I accurately said and when I said it. The story gained an insane momentum through out that week after I made my post. That and I'm still waiting on that Becky Lynch title run. Again please accurate reflect what I actually said rather than post something like this. I'd rather talk about the topic.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2015 17:59:25 GMT -5
Joe will be brought in to feud with Reigns as Heyman Guy II after Brock retains at WM (and re-signs with WWE). The story will be centered around the fact that Joe feels overlooked because he is not from the right "right" tribe of Samoa. He will be mostly fed to Reigns and then have a midcard role. Source: A Jar Of Mayonnaise. If anyone would know what Joe is up to it would be a jar of mayonnaise. It's the perfect cover for getting inside stories.
|
|
|
Post by Catchphrase! on Mar 11, 2015 18:07:58 GMT -5
That and I'm still waiting on that Becky Lynch title run. Again please accurate reflect what I actually said rather than post something like this. I'd rather talk about the topic. Regarding Becky Lynch: She's winning the title on the 11th. Her matches have been laid out for months so it will be a shock. The announcers have been foreshadowing it too. I'd say both were fairly accurate...
|
|