jemtruman
ALF
Chances are, I stole it from the tumbles.
Posts: 1,238
|
Post by jemtruman on Jul 7, 2015 8:35:11 GMT -5
Is it just me or do bright/highly lighted arenas, such as the Sumo Stadium used at Beast in the East and the Hammerstein Ballroom used for One Night Stand, among others, have a different feel?
Do places like that make you feel like it's a bigger or smaller atmosphere? Does it make the event feel more traditional to you?
|
|
魔界5号
Hank Scorpio
No. 1 FAN Poster You Want To Hug
Posts: 6,319 
|
Post by 魔界5号 on Jul 7, 2015 8:41:09 GMT -5
Absolutely. Lighting and such contributes heavily to the atmosphere, at least in my eyes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2015 8:55:29 GMT -5
Yes, and I prefer the toned down approach. It looks more like a sport than a circus, you can see the crowd reacting to thing, and it's just easier on the eyes in general.
|
|
kidglov3s
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants her Shot
Who is Tiger Maskooo?
Posts: 15,870
|
Post by kidglov3s on Jul 7, 2015 8:58:12 GMT -5
What I really think hurts WWE aesthetic the most is the overuse of LCD. I think what helped Beast in the East the most was that there were no LCD ring aprons, and no flashing LCD panels along the decks. LCD to me communicates flashy, fake and safe.
|
|
|
|
Post by This Player Hating Mothman on Jul 7, 2015 9:04:05 GMT -5
As a show recorded in front of a live audience encouraged to react to what's happening, a well-lit crowd that can actually be seen would be much better aesthetically than the crap they do now with it. Unless they start drawing Impact crowds and have to look like they tape in the Negative Zone just to keep from embarrassment, they should really light the place up, especially on the side opposite the hard camera, which we see the most throughout the show.
|
|
