J is Justice
Wade Wilson
Will now be grateful.
Hi.
Posts: 28,059 
|
Post by J is Justice on Oct 3, 2015 21:36:23 GMT -5
where all 30 participants end up in the ring at the same time? So basically, not a single wrestler would get eliminated until that point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Giul T. on Oct 3, 2015 21:38:08 GMT -5
where all 30 participants end up in the ring at the same time? So basically, not a single wrestler would get eliminated until that point. No. And I've already seen it of sorts. Just everyone starts in the ring. I don't believe it would go any differently with 20 minutes of entrances and teases. |
|
andrew8798
FANatic
on 24/7 this month
Posts: 106,081
|
Post by andrew8798 on Oct 3, 2015 21:43:25 GMT -5
People have talked about this idea since 94
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2015 21:53:46 GMT -5
I think more than anything what I want to happen in a Rumble is just for someone other than 1, 2, 3, or 5 to be the first eliminated. Just because it'd be such an easy thing to do and it'd just be something different. The Rumble's really starting to show its age in recent years and I'll take any shake-up I can get.
Well, besides what's quickly becoming the tradition of the crowd shitting all over the finish, anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tiger Millionaire on Oct 3, 2015 22:01:33 GMT -5
In WCW they had World War 3, which was either 60 or 90 men in 3 rings at once; it was horrible.
|
|
|
|
Post by This Player Hating Mothman on Oct 3, 2015 22:05:56 GMT -5
30 man battle royales don't open on the "everyone gangs up to eliminate Big Show" spot solely for the logic of it. There's no space to do anything, and the ring becomes overly crowded with people just brawling until shit happens. Chaos is good for a royal rumble, but to an extent, and the amount of time people would have to spend trading punches until all thirty are even in the ring would make the match boring as sin.
|
|
|
|
Post by Starshine on Oct 3, 2015 22:21:54 GMT -5
Will there ever be a royal rumble where all 29 eliminations happen before number 30 enters?
|
|
SAJ Forth
Wade Wilson
Jamaican WCF Crazy!
Half Man-Half Amazing
Posts: 27,214
|
Post by SAJ Forth on Oct 4, 2015 11:28:10 GMT -5
Will there be one where one of the legends win.
|
|
Crappler El 0 M
Dalek
Never Forgets an Octagon
I'm a good R-Truth.
Posts: 58,479
|
Post by Crappler El 0 M on Oct 4, 2015 11:30:40 GMT -5
No, and I wouldn't like to see it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2015 11:32:58 GMT -5
1994 and 2006 were I think as close as we got to it (which were still quite a ways away) and those crowded rings just did not work.
|
|
Big Poppa Pumpkin
Dennis Stamp
I'll be in the back polishing............ my belt.
Posts: 4,987
|
Post by Big Poppa Pumpkin on Oct 4, 2015 11:40:58 GMT -5
It would be amusing if the ring just broke under all the weight and everyone was eliminated at once
|
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Oct 4, 2015 19:52:51 GMT -5
No, it would be a mess.
The "everyone out before 30 enters" suggestion on the other hand could be amazing if the right person was #30.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2015 19:56:03 GMT -5
No, it would be a mess. The "everyone out before 30 enters" suggestion on the other hand could be amazing if the right person was #30.  |
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on Oct 4, 2015 19:57:11 GMT -5
Another scenario I'd like to see is someone winning after all 30 have entered, only for the clock to countdown and a 31st entrant to come in and win it, probably a heel screwing over a face.
|
|
|
|
Post by StormanReigns on Oct 4, 2015 19:57:32 GMT -5
Why would you want to watch 30 minutes of a very crowded ring? A ring so crowded no one can do anything
|
|
|
|
Post by Saul Goodman on Oct 4, 2015 20:32:44 GMT -5
That was my booking plan for Roman Reigns at the last Royal Rumble. To make him look strong, have all 29 wrestlers in the ring at the same time with no eliminations. Roman will be the 30th person in the ring, once he gets to the ring he eliminates everyone, starting with 1st and ending with 29th. It will be the worst Royal Rumble of all time and people would crap all over Roman. WWE will think it is making Roman look strong and a good challenge for Brock at WrestleMania.
|
|
Lupin the Third
Patti Mayonnaise
I'm sorry.....I love you. *boot to the head*--3rd most culpable in the jixing of NXT, D'oh!
Join the Dark Order....
Posts: 36,316
|
Post by Lupin the Third on Oct 4, 2015 20:34:16 GMT -5
So instead of the Rumble lasting 45 minutes to an hour, it'd last 10-20 minutes.
|
|
Rican
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
July 17, 2011 - HHHe called it
Posts: 16,461
|
Post by Rican on Oct 4, 2015 20:35:48 GMT -5
No, it would be a mess. The "everyone out before 30 enters" suggestion on the other hand could be amazing if the right person was #30. I really thought they were gonna do it in 2012 when Jericho was doing the JeriTroll thing. Would have been great. Jericho doing victory laps and high fiving everyone before going in the ring, just milking it for several minutes. |
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Oct 4, 2015 22:56:43 GMT -5
I generally hate battle royales.
They're a clusterf*** if you have more than 8 people in the ring and contain next to zero storytelling until you get down to the last couple people.
At least the Rumble is drawn out. I don't have a problem with it getting busy at times, but it works best when you have just a few people dominating at different times.
Also I hate the under the rope rule. That kills any reason for someone to stay in the ring.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alyce: Old Media Enthusiast on Oct 4, 2015 23:02:09 GMT -5
Nah, that's what regular battle royals are for.
|
|
