What Do YOU Think Should Main Event WM 32?

[KAMALARAMBO: BOOMSHAKALAKA!!!]

It looks like after last night Cena/Reigns is a strong possibility. I actually wouldn't mind it that much at this point. They managed not to let Reigns/Brock at WM be a total disaster, so I could see it getting pulled off.

But should they? If not then what? Or are you down with Cena/Reigns?

[Sam Punk]

Cena/Orton

[EoE: Well There's Your Problem]

Whatever the WWE Championship match is, that main events. It's been good enough for 84% of all WrestleManias, after all (counting the World Heavyweight Championship as well, but the three times it main evented was when it was still equal to the WWE Championship).

[Deleted]

Cena vs Reigns?

Dosent get much worse than that. Jesus.

[Deleted]

Cena vs HHH vs The Rock

[Deleted]

WM32? Ambrose/Reigns personally but say WM33, I want that triple threat. Personally I couldn't mind Shield having 3 different triple threats until they call it quit tbh.

WM33 - Beginning of their career, main eventing WM at what, 33 years old?
WM36-WM37 - Middle of their careers when they're in their prime, 36-37 years old, it's perfect
WM42-WM42 - End of their careers at around 42-43, time to hang it up, one last sendoff

Now, they don't have to main event the final one but the other 2 would be perfect. I approve.

[Instant Classic]

Cena vs Undertaker if it happens.

[Pushed to the Moon]

Dec 29, 2015 17:48:30 GMT -5 EoE: Well There's Your Problem said:

Whatever the WWE Championship match is, that main events. It's been good enough for 84% of all WrestleManias, after all (counting the World Heavyweight Championship as well, but the three times it main evented was when it was still equal to the WWE Championship).

This unless perhaps if Taker is retiring.

[Clawley Race]

Gauntlet match.

World Champ Roman Reigns vs US Champ Del Rio
Winner vs IC Champ Dean Ambrose vs Kevin Owens (triple threat)
Winner vs Tag Champs New Day (3 on 1 Handicap)
Winner vs John Cena
Winner vs Triple H
Winner vs The Rock

Roman wins all matches.

I want to hear the crowd react, and watch the internet break. He can beat Undertaker, Lesnar, and Bryan if you want...but we have to be realistic. And we need an undercard.

[Deleted]

Roman Reigns(c) vs. John Cena for the WWE championship.

[Ruthless Pessimism]

Lesnar. Reigns has improved over the last year and Heyman can still sell that match like no one else.

Give Reigns the solo win over Lesnar in a hell of a match, then set up his next challenger the following night on RAW (someone the fans have been clamoring for, that could take the belt possibly at Extreme Rules).

[fw91]

I keep on saying Reigns vs Ambrose as I think it could fix a lot of "wrongs." But it doesn't seem to be looking that way. Ambrose would win the rumble, beat Reigns at Mania for the title. Reigns turns heel the next night on Raw on Ambrose. We have a blood feud as the summer angle, we tie into Seth's return, and the shield triple threat headlines Summerslam. That would......
A) Have crowd pleasing Rumble finish, something we hadn't had since Edge in 2010
B) Have a mania main event not reliant on part timers
C) Would have a mania main event build. "Hungry guys wanting to walk out with the title at the biggest stage" no personal bs.
D) Eventually negate Reign's boo's.

[fw91]

Dec 29, 2015 19:26:56 GMT -5 Ruthless Pessimism said:

Lesnar. Reigns has improved over the last year and Heyman can still sell that match like no one else.

Give Reigns the solo win over Lesnar in a hell of a match, then set up his next challenger the following night on RAW (someone the fans have been clamoring for, that could take the belt possibly at Extreme Rules).

hmmm............ "Summer of Owens?"

[Mayonnaise]

It is Roman/Brock. This story does not have a finish and they want to crown their next mega star at Mania. Cena is the pass the torch match and you don't do that until you know you can ride with the person you want to pass the torch to.