TuneinTokyo
Hank Scorpio
The Mountain from Stone Mountain
Posts: 6,431
|
Post by TuneinTokyo on Oct 26, 2006 19:55:17 GMT -5
Just curious why two Asian chicks making out is wrong?
There is no religion here, remember. How is this offensive.
Just to raise a question that's all, I really don't care one way or the other.
|
|
|
Post by Allison Reynolds on Oct 26, 2006 20:00:40 GMT -5
I originally accepted the sig, because it showed no nudity, and the fact that there was a same sex kissing thread that was deemed by the other staff as alright, I figured that the sig would be alright too.
Well now that I think about it I agree with parts of what Leon Kennedy said. It's not completely against the rules, it's borderline. BUT if I let someone put up a borderline picture, people might then put up worse things to test the limits, or put up more sexual pictures just because someone else has one.
I guess I'm just trying my best to keep the board running smooth.
|
|
TuneinTokyo
Hank Scorpio
The Mountain from Stone Mountain
Posts: 6,431
|
Post by TuneinTokyo on Oct 26, 2006 20:04:37 GMT -5
well right on for that. I mean though, that guy that had the fat girl sig, man that was offensive to me, but you know, whatever.
|
|
|
Post by BD Punk AKA SUSPENDED! on Oct 26, 2006 20:35:43 GMT -5
well right on for that. I mean though, that guy that had the fat girl sig, man that was offensive to me, but you know, whatever. Hell yeah! Those pics are nasty but if he wants to have those pics in his sig he can. I'm not offended by much, pics such as fat women and gay guys making out aren't pleasing to look at but if someone wants to put it in their sig or avatar it's fine w/me. Same goes for asian women making out. I think it should be allowed, but I guess I'm too lenient when it comes to that stuff. I think it should be allowed if it has no nudity in it, but people gotta be all PC and stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Palatial Regalia on Oct 26, 2006 21:02:54 GMT -5
boring 2 girls making out is so 1990s
|
|
TuneinTokyo
Hank Scorpio
The Mountain from Stone Mountain
Posts: 6,431
|
Post by TuneinTokyo on Oct 26, 2006 21:08:41 GMT -5
upon watching the sig in question I take back my original statement. While it was quality video, I'm not sure it is appropriate for middle schooler's around here.
|
|
|
Post by Koda, Master Crunchyroller on Oct 26, 2006 21:14:09 GMT -5
Plz pm me the gif....I missed it.....and you know how I love my Asians....both male and female......
DON'T DEPRIVE ME OF MY ASIANS!!!!!! >(
|
|
therob
Hank Scorpio
Mcginley to Slim's O'neil
Posts: 7,257
|
Post by therob on Oct 26, 2006 22:25:45 GMT -5
Heres an idea. get Firefox or most of the modern browsers right click the image and block the image from being shown on your computer. I did it with all the fat girl pics. never had to look at them.
|
|
|
Post by blueblazer1123 on Oct 26, 2006 22:34:38 GMT -5
A question about appropriateness of sig photos eh?
*looks skyward in contemplative manner, clicks tongue rhythmically, contemplates question*
... Do whatever you want, it's ultimately up to the Moderators if it's acceptable.
At least, that's the word on the street.
|
|
|
Post by The Booty Disciple on Oct 26, 2006 23:12:28 GMT -5
Heh...I see Madison edited out therob's post, and then edited all replies to it...so my remark about prefering the term 'wang' no longer makes a lick of sense.
|
|
therob
Hank Scorpio
Mcginley to Slim's O'neil
Posts: 7,257
|
Post by therob on Oct 26, 2006 23:13:07 GMT -5
Heh...I see Madison edited out therob's post, and then edited all replies to it...so my remark about prefering the term 'wang' no longer makes a lick of sense. Why would someone do such a horrible thing
|
|
|
Post by The Booty Disciple on Oct 26, 2006 23:19:34 GMT -5
Heh...I see Madison edited out therob's post, and then edited all replies to it...so my remark about prefering the term 'wang' no longer makes a lick of sense. Why would someone do such a horrible thing Probably because in the context you put those two words, both euphamisms of the same male organ that I use wang for, were a wee bit past the line. At least in polite company, which we attempt to keep around here...or at least the Mods do. ;D Though, after further reflection, I think my explanation still allows people to get the humor in the Regal situation.
|
|
|
Post by Alucard on Oct 26, 2006 23:20:27 GMT -5
I so can't believe this thread is still alive.
|
|
therob
Hank Scorpio
Mcginley to Slim's O'neil
Posts: 7,257
|
Post by therob on Oct 26, 2006 23:21:29 GMT -5
Why would someone do such a horrible thing Probably because in the context you put those two words, both euphamisms of the same male organ that I use wang for, were a wee bit past the line. At least in polite company, which we attempt to keep around here...or at least the Mods do. ;D Though, after further reflection, I think my explanation still allows people to get the humor in the Regal situation. Still, maybe I said cock in reference to a chicken and dick for Richard nixon.I just assumed you guys would know what I was talking about.
|
|
|
Post by The Booty Disciple on Oct 26, 2006 23:32:11 GMT -5
Probably because in the context you put those two words, both euphamisms of the same male organ that I use wang for, were a wee bit past the line. At least in polite company, which we attempt to keep around here...or at least the Mods do. ;D Though, after further reflection, I think my explanation still allows people to get the humor in the Regal situation. Still, maybe I said cock in reference to a chicken and dick for Richard nixon.I just assumed you guys would know what I was talking about. It's not an issue of us not knowing what you were talking about, it's an issue of the fact that without providing those examples of your slang, it was up for interpretation. And I dunno about you, but if I wasn't INFORMED that you were referring to a chicken and a former President, I'd say that there's a definite chance of it being interpreted in a sexual connotation. Judging by this thread, though, I could be crazy
|
|
therob
Hank Scorpio
Mcginley to Slim's O'neil
Posts: 7,257
|
Post by therob on Oct 26, 2006 23:33:36 GMT -5
Still, maybe I said cock in reference to a chicken and dick for Richard nixon.I just assumed you guys would know what I was talking about. It's not an issue of us not knowing what you were talking about, it's an issue of the fact that without providing those examples of your slang, it was up for interpretation. And I dunno about you, but if I wasn't INFORMED that you were referring to a chicken and a former President, I'd say that there's a definite chance of it being interpreted in a sexual connotation. Judging by this thread, though, I could be crazy I was just joking I meant it as the slang terminology for a guys junk.
|
|
superfoe
Dennis Stamp
Post count: altered. Date: irrelevant. Always being a n00b: priceless.
Free posting for life.
Posts: 4,703
|
Post by superfoe on Oct 26, 2006 23:36:17 GMT -5
Totally on topic, I think we can safely say the answer to the original question is yes.
|
|
|
Post by Alucard on Oct 26, 2006 23:38:01 GMT -5
Yeah.
Asian lesbian action+sig=offended people
Which is perhaps the best formula I've ever written.
|
|
superfoe
Dennis Stamp
Post count: altered. Date: irrelevant. Always being a n00b: priceless.
Free posting for life.
Posts: 4,703
|
Post by superfoe on Oct 26, 2006 23:42:53 GMT -5
Does anyone have the original gif that they could pm me? I kinda wish I could see what the fuss is all about.
Edit: yeah, that's a bit extreme... Pretty good, but extreme.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfpack Bitch on Oct 26, 2006 23:46:55 GMT -5
All I know is that the sigs removal saved me from going through and finding guy on guy gifs and posting them.. I may have looked anyway. Where the hell did my halo go ??
|
|