Rogue One: A Star Wars Story - Nostalgia Critic

[JoDaNa1281]

*language warning*




Also, next month is January, you know what that means...SEQUEL MONTH: THE SEQUEL!!!

[metylerca]

Used to be he'd wait a decade or so before reviewing these. There'd be retrospect and actual footage from the films to use in the review for reference.

[JoDaNa1281]

Dec 28, 2016 19:02:03 GMT -5 metylerca said:

Used to be he'd wait a decade or so before reviewing these. There'd be retrospect and actual footage from the films to use in the review for reference.

There still is actual footage from the films for nearly all of his reviews...but, even if he waits a decade, there's still gonna be some films that he won't be able to show any scenes from(as a few of his reviews being taken down shows), that's just the way it is in some cases, unfortunately.

[OGBoardPoster2005]

He does need retrospect to work though. Thats why I never watch these. A film may seem great or awful on early glance but time can change that perspective. I use to love Dark Knight Rises, but as time has gone on, I've seen its flaws. Same for Skyfall.

[Mike Strike]

Remember when these would be Bum Reviews?

Doug doesn't.

[Deleted]

Director Krennic.

.....come on.

[Glitch]

Gotta admit, I liked that ending credit scene with Vader dancing on the Star Destroyer.

[Bang Bang Bart]

Dec 29, 2016 5:18:22 GMT -5 @knapp said:

Director Krennic.

.....come on.

To be fair, intelligence agencies do have people designated as "director", so it's likely the same case for that guy.

[Deleted]

Dec 29, 2016 8:37:08 GMT -5 Bang Bang Bart said:

Dec 29, 2016 5:18:22 GMT -5 @knapp said:

Director Krennic.

.....come on.

To be fair, intelligence agencies do have people designated as "director", so it's likely the same case for that guy.

Oh no. I was highlighting the title because the review calls him General Krennic. Like, 2 or 3 times. Because they didn't pay attention.

[A Platypus Rave]

Dec 29, 2016 17:43:04 GMT -5 @knapp said:

Dec 29, 2016 8:37:08 GMT -5 Bang Bang Bart said:

To be fair, intelligence agencies do have people designated as "director", so it's likely the same case for that guy.

Oh no. I was highlighting the title because the review calls him General Krennic. Like, 2 or 3 times. Because they didn't pay attention.

which is another reason these reviews while they are still in theaters are dumb.

You can't sit down and rewatch them at your leisure while writing to catch blatant mistakes like that.

["Cane Dewey" Johnson]