|
Post by Captain Stud Muffin (BLM) on May 12, 2020 21:32:18 GMT -5
The problem with that is that there's actually people who generally do work with charities and if they work with someone like 69 then the reputation of the charity changes and it might cause said people who donate to donate to other charities instead, other charities who help children as well. It's a bad look because you're supposed to be about saving the children, making sure they're fed and whatnot. Sure, it's money and you can "do good with it" but that's not to say that the backlash to that won't do more harm especially when there's other companies out there who can say "we won't accept this man's money" which would then give them an influx of donators who don't support him.
It's bad to work with someone like him even if he's donating money to kids because in the end you could be hurting more kids than helping them. Especially considering he was broadcasting to everyone that he's working with them.
Might this, maybe that, what if this... To me it is more moral to use that money to feed kids, than to worry about where it came from. And if there are other people that say it's more important to project a certain image than to do what it is you're supposed to do as a charity, then I will say they too are at fault. However, this is devolving into a circular argument where none of us are going to see eye to eye. And I will say I'm not a nonprofit, I'm not a charity, and I'll guess you aren't either. So it very well could be that taking the money would in some way be ultimately detrimental. I have the luxury of looking at it from the outside, from a pragmatic standpoint of judging your actions based upon what the end result is. And the end result could be 200k towards feeding kids that might not get to eat otherwise. And plus a bad man now has 200k less in his bank account. Na I wouldn't say we are not seeing eye to eye. You're not wrong, it is the logical way to think It is just giving you the other side of it. I personally don't think it is as black and white as you are making it as yes that is ultimately for the kids but their are real life fallout problems that would stem from this As I said already, they made their choice and will have to live with it. Going to get praise for taking a stand and get rained on for being idiots and putting themselves before the children. They got to deal with the fallout of their decisions
|
|
lucas_lee
Hank Scorpio
Heel turn is finished, now stripping away my personality
Posts: 6,722
|
Post by lucas_lee on May 12, 2020 23:49:06 GMT -5
Might this, maybe that, what if this... To me it is more moral to use that money to feed kids, than to worry about where it came from. And if there are other people that say it's more important to project a certain image than to do what it is you're supposed to do as a charity, then I will say they too are at fault. However, this is devolving into a circular argument where none of us are going to see eye to eye. And I will say I'm not a nonprofit, I'm not a charity, and I'll guess you aren't either. So it very well could be that taking the money would in some way be ultimately detrimental. I have the luxury of looking at it from the outside, from a pragmatic standpoint of judging your actions based upon what the end result is. And the end result could be 200k towards feeding kids that might not get to eat otherwise. And plus a bad man now has 200k less in his bank account. Na I wouldn't say we are not seeing eye to eye. You're not wrong, it is the logical way to think It is just giving you the other side of it. I personally don't think it is as black and white as you are making it as yes that is ultimately for the kids but their are real life fallout problems that would stem from this As I said already, they made their choice and will have to live with it. Going to get praise for taking a stand and get rained on for being idiots and putting themselves before the children. They got to deal with the fallout of their decisions If the charity did accept his money, I ll bet someone the internet is gonna start a massive stink over it (rightfully or unrightfully) and that chairity is gonna be under fire. Its a hard decision to make. Im sure they wouldve loved the 250K if 6xnine did it anonymously
|
|
|
Post by Captain Stud Muffin (BLM) on May 12, 2020 23:55:42 GMT -5
Na I wouldn't say we are not seeing eye to eye. You're not wrong, it is the logical way to think It is just giving you the other side of it. I personally don't think it is as black and white as you are making it as yes that is ultimately for the kids but their are real life fallout problems that would stem from this As I said already, they made their choice and will have to live with it. Going to get praise for taking a stand and get rained on for being idiots and putting themselves before the children. They got to deal with the fallout of their decisions If the charity did accept his money, I ll bet someone the internet is gonna start a massive stink over it (rightfully or unrightfully) and that chairity is gonna be under fire. Its a hard decision to make. Im sure they wouldve loved the 250K if 6xnine did it anonymously Yea, which is why I think if he truly isn't clout chasing and looking to do some good in his life he will be sending these donations without his name attached to it and it will only be a good deed in his heart he know he did I think his heart was in the right place with this but he has to think on shit like this.
|
|
|
Post by EvenBaldobombHasAJob on May 13, 2020 7:08:03 GMT -5
If the charity did accept his money, I ll bet someone the internet is gonna start a massive stink over it (rightfully or unrightfully) and that chairity is gonna be under fire. Its a hard decision to make. Im sure they wouldve loved the 250K if 6xnine did it anonymously Yea, which is why I think if he truly isn't clout chasing and looking to do some good in his life he will be sending these donations without his name attached to it and it will only be a good deed in his heart he know he did I think his heart was in the right place with this but he has to think on shit like this. Basically this. If he'd just donated anonymously there'd be no stink buy because he shouted from the mountaintops about it at a time when his reputation is in the shitter, people are always going to be suspicious of his motives (hell I know I am). As for the charity, even if it's a lot of money that can be put to good use, they have to say "no". There are no good optics for an organization that supposedly cares about children publicly accepting money from a man who sexually assaulted a young girl. They have to think about how the general public will react, how their donors and charitable partners will react. And none of those reactions are going to be good. They had to think of the long term optics of this and when you look at it that way, there was exactly one choice they could make.
|
|
chazraps
Wade Wilson
Better have my money when I come-a collect!
Posts: 27,982
|
Post by chazraps on May 14, 2020 2:32:46 GMT -5
Yea, which is why I think if he truly isn't clout chasing and looking to do some good in his life he will be sending these donations without his name attached to it and it will only be a good deed in his heart he know he did I think his heart was in the right place with this but he has to think on shit like this. Basically this. If he'd just donated anonymously there'd be no stink buy because he shouted from the mountaintops about it at a time when his reputation is in the shitter, people are always going to be suspicious of his motives (hell I know I am). As for the charity, even if it's a lot of money that can be put to good use, they have to say "no". There are no good optics for an organization that supposedly cares about children publicly accepting money from a man who sexually assaulted a young girl. They have to think about how the general public will react, how their donors and charitable partners will react. And none of those reactions are going to be good. They had to think of the long term optics of this and when you look at it that way, there was exactly one choice they could make.It all comes down to this. They made the right call.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Stud Muffin (BLM) on May 16, 2020 0:50:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ronny Rayguns Is All Elite on May 25, 2020 20:20:03 GMT -5
Regardless of how this ends, like 15-20 years from now the movie about this Fool is going to be crazy
|
|
|
Post by autisticgeordie on May 26, 2020 1:35:04 GMT -5
Should we get a Netflix documentary about this clown ala Tiger King?
|
|
|
Post by El Cokehead del Knife Fight on May 26, 2020 3:56:41 GMT -5
Oh you think I'm snitchin now? This isn't even my final snitch!
|
|
|
Post by Captain Stud Muffin (BLM) on Oct 21, 2020 14:11:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by EvenBaldobombHasAJob on Oct 21, 2020 15:22:48 GMT -5
Good. People need to be reminded he was already a total slimeball even before the racketeering.
|
|
BRV
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants him some Taco Flavored Kisses.
Posts: 16,956
|
Post by BRV on Dec 5, 2020 22:18:59 GMT -5
Should we get a Netflix documentary about this clown ala Tiger King? A documentary titled "69: The Saga of Danny Hernandez" was released on Hulu last month. It's unremarkable, but at the end of the day, it feels like little more than a flashier version of VH1's "Behind the Music," as it's a 90-minute story about a kid who rose to fame and fortune, then crashed and burned, and is now climbing his way back up. But it should be so much more than that. Within the first minute of the documentary, you know the movie is more than it should be. The filmmaker is interviewing a man on the street in Brooklyn about knowing young Danny Hernandez, when some random people off to the side begin talking trash and outright threatening both the interviewer and subject for even bringing up Danny Hernandez's name in the streets of Bushwick. But then it just flattens out, becoming every stereotypical music documentary you've ever seen about musicians rising to fame - their failures and successes along the way - reaching the pinnacles before being knocked from their perch and crashing back down. The problem is, "69" seems like it treats Danny Hernandez's fall with kid gloves. It only briefly discusses his child sexual performance charges and almost brushes it aside as one of those "you've got to fall to get back up" sort of moments. It so briefly touches on the Chief Keef shooting that if you blink, you'd miss it. It doesn't discuss his domestic violence until the very end, when the mother of his daughter brings it up almost unprompted. And when it comes to the infamous "snitching" trial, that's treated as sort of a coda to the documentary, not the enormous part of his life that it's become that'll follow him for the remainder of his career. That was what the documentary felt like it should've been building toward, instead it was almost this rushed ending. Ultimately, the documentary fails because it doesn't get interviews with 6ix9ine or any of his genuinely close-knit associates (aside from his personal driver) and tries too hard to play fair to both sides, like he was this humble kid who got caught up in the gang life and it just enveloped him. It's not at all like "Tiger King," which basically peeled back the whole top on the can of worms and told the viewers to have a look.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Stud Muffin (BLM) on Feb 20, 2021 18:10:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Clash, Never a Meter Maid on Feb 20, 2021 18:30:05 GMT -5
Ah, so he’s learned absolutely nothing. Good for him.
Even rational, functional recording artists who use common sense have security. What’s your excuse?
|
|
|
Post by Captain Stud Muffin (BLM) on Feb 21, 2021 15:11:26 GMT -5
That boy wilding
He said somebody tell King Von to hop on his IG live
King Von got shot and killed last year
|
|
|
Post by Captain Stud Muffin (BLM) on Mar 2, 2021 11:28:00 GMT -5
|
|
XIII
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Posts: 18,557
|
Post by XIII on Mar 2, 2021 11:50:07 GMT -5
This dude graduated last in his class from clown college
|
|
|
Post by Confused Mark Wahlberg on Mar 2, 2021 11:54:55 GMT -5
His '69' tattoo is upside down.
Note: I might have made this joke before in this thread, I don't know.
|
|
|
Post by Fade is a CodyCryBaby on Mar 2, 2021 11:55:29 GMT -5
This dude graduated last in his class from clown college That’s genuinely disrespectful to everyone who graduated last in their class in Clown College.
|
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,293
|
Post by Push R Truth on Mar 2, 2021 12:05:01 GMT -5
I feel like this dude's obituary is already written they are just waiting for the Clue style reveal of how he died.
The odds on him surviving another 5 years has to be about zero.
|
|