|
Post by Final Countdown Jones on Jan 21, 2019 16:24:26 GMT -5
It isn't speaking for others to take issue with their treatment and decide you personally don't want a part of something. I read it as the source saying they were the ones who raised the examples of The Bar, AoP and Groodle. To me, especially in a company's petty as WWE can be (not giving them their release a clear example) that's just making waves for other guys who might not have as big a problem for the sake of their own careers, but that's just my perception and as we've already said, is probably wrong based on my own bias. Taking issue with all of those examples and even "You guys screwed over Tekno Team 2000, they really could have been something" still is not speaking for others if it is entirely contained to their personal views and issues, and their own willingness to work for the company responsible for them. "Gable and Roode are sad about this, apologize to them" is speaking for others and there's no indication any of that has happened here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2019 16:30:09 GMT -5
I read it as the source saying they were the ones who raised the examples of The Bar, AoP and Groodle. To me, especially in a company's petty as WWE can be (not giving them their release a clear example) that's just making waves for other guys who might not have as big a problem for the sake of their own careers, but that's just my perception and as we've already said, is probably wrong based on my own bias. Taking issue with all of those examples and even "You guys screwed over Tekno Team 2000, they really could have been something" still is not speaking for others if it is entirely contained to their personal views and issues, and their own willingness to work for the company responsible for them. "Gable and Roode are sad about this, apologize to them" is speaking for others and there's no indication any of that has happened here. I see where you're coming from totally. Just personally if I were in AN Other tag team (or in any other business anywhere) I wouldn't want my name being used in that context unless I'd okayed it. That's just my perspective on it, where I'm coming from. It's not intentional but it feels like stirring to me, but as I say, that's just me.
|
|
|
Post by HMARK Center on Jan 21, 2019 17:15:18 GMT -5
If the report is true, then I get the feeling that they were basically saying something like "We're aware that even if you guys start pushing us more and we end up as tag champs that it still won't mean anything; you put the belts on Roode and Gable and don't even have them doing anything, so what hope is there for any of us if that's the way you book the champs of the division?"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2019 18:46:12 GMT -5
I think just because they got over in nxt doesn’t mean they’d get over on the main roster. Quite possible but it's not as though they've ever actually been given a chance to do so.
|
|
|
Post by "Gizzark" Mike Wronglevenay on Jan 22, 2019 15:16:10 GMT -5
I think just because they got over in nxt doesn’t mean they’d get over on the main roster. Quite possible but it's not as though they've ever actually been given a chance to do so. Yeah, I mark for NXT Revival but I expected before they got called up that they wouldn't get over with the mainstream WWE crowd. And the booking hasn't given them the remotest chance of doing so, but I don't think they would anyway outside of New York, Philly, Canada, etc.
|
|