Would you be up for another 50 man Rumble?

[wildojinx]

While im unsure if they even have 50 wrestlers they could plug in there, I did like the spectacle of the Greatest Royal Rumble match. As long as they dont do one to satisfy the Saudi Prince (have the 50 man rumble as a special edition of RAW), I wouldnt mind seeing another one, if just to see how they stretch it out to 50.

[jivesoulbrah]

They couldn’t even book a 30 man rumble to be entertaining, 50 would be dreadful.

[Push R Truth]

WWE doesn't have the restraint to book a 50+ man rumble without 90% of the story being the first entrant making it to the end. And of course it would be Roman because they are going to start having to make up accolades for him because holding a world title forever isn't enough to make him look strong or some other bullshit.

[Nosnorb]

If it was batshit insane and had lots of cameos, sure.

[Kalmia]

A 50-man Rumble with two-minute intervals sounds like torture. Maybe if they could blow through it quicker, with 60 or 90-second intervals it would be okay.

[Deleted]

Do they have 50 wrestlers anymore?

[Wieners=$$$]

50 seems a bit excessive.

I say they try to do a 2 man Rumble first, and build from there.

[häšhtå.gdālėÿ]

Absolutely. And every other entrant is like that random sumo guy. It would be absolutely terrible but would assuredly be a top thread of the year here.

[Finish Uncle Muffin’s Story]

As long as there were a fair amount of cameos and they actually put in some effort, sure.

[Jindrak Mark]

With their current roster that would be an absolute borefest.

30 is the perfect number and even that is a struggle to have enough relevant names sometimes (1995, 2022).

[El Cokehead del Knife Fight]

They couldn't even book a 30 man rumble this year.

[msc]

Yes, but I'm the wrong person to ask. Rumbleholic.

[HMARK Center]

I say make it 60, but spread them across three rings all at the same time. It can’t fail!

[Deleted]

Depends how it's booked. If it's booking is like last month then nah I'm good.

[hbkid718]

Hell no. It would force me into an insane asylum keeping up with everything. They did it once & should never do it again.

[floundertime]

Absolutely!

We’d get legends upon legends like Sumo Guy and Khali!

Ok maybe not.

But if this did happen, would they force upon us a staged Titus World Slide. You know they would and Vince would be laughing for hours because of it. That’s good sh&t!

[wildojinx]

Feb 17, 2022 21:19:53 GMT -5 floundertime said:

Absolutely!

We’d get legends upon legends like Sumo Guy and Khali!

Ok maybe not.

But if this did happen, would they force upon us a staged Titus World Slide. You know they would and Vince would be laughing for hours because of it. That’s good sh&t!

This time he slides completely under the ring and slides out on the other side.

[Deleted]

Their Rumble matches for the most part have been shockingly bad and predictable recently.

It really doesn't matter how many wrestlers are in it. Its about the booking.

[Non Banjoble Tokens]

I remember back when Vince first bought WCW and ECW and they were bringing all those wrestlers over to WWE. I was fantasy booking 60 people Royal Rumbles and included some women in them. I had 60 second intervals. I can,t imagine how chaotic something like that would be in reality, soooo YES they should totally do it. 60 wrestlers, with 60 second intervals. So many apeshit crazy possibilities for who could randomly show up in it. Total anarchy. It would be the closest thing to World War 3 we could get in this day and age. A wonderful, wonderful trainwreck.

[A Platypus Rave]

Feb 17, 2022 19:22:30 GMT -5 HMARK Center said:

I say make it 60, but spread them across three rings all at the same time. It can’t fail!

and have 3 commentators and try to show all 3 rings at the same time!

what could go wrong <_<