|
Post by This Player Hating Mothman on Jan 8, 2024 1:58:09 GMT -5
I'm way less down on the idea of two because I get the utility and narrative necessities in play. But three has no reason to exist and any of the reasons for it boil down to there not even really being two to begin with because of what they've done with Roman and this run. There's a purpose to having two titles and putting them on one guy to make him seem more impressive makes it dumber, and then the spinelessness of making a third title is just crazy.
|
|
TWERKIN' MAGGLE
Crow T. Robot
Black Lives Matter
Posts: 46,140
Member is Online
|
Post by TWERKIN' MAGGLE on Jan 8, 2024 2:35:16 GMT -5
Now that Kevin is done, we should do no titles, no ring, no moves for a year. Just to really piss him off.
|
|
|
Post by Sponsored by Groose Wipes on Jan 8, 2024 13:45:28 GMT -5
I honestly don't even like two titles, let alone three.
|
|
|
Post by Von Wagner's Brownies on Jan 8, 2024 13:59:16 GMT -5
I don't even like two world titles.
Three world titles? Hell no.
|
|
clc
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,542
|
Post by clc on Jan 8, 2024 15:02:00 GMT -5
Now that Kevin is done, we should do no titles, no ring, no moves for a year. Just to really piss him off. Every show opens up with Becky reading the telephone book.
|
|
|
Post by Oh Cry Me a Screwball on Jan 9, 2024 1:42:05 GMT -5
The NXT title already more or less functions as the third world title anyway. What niche would another "world title" really hold without WWE creating a fourth brand?
|
|
UN PLOMBIER NIGHTMARE #blm
Grimlock
Sponsorisé par St. Michel Choco Chip Madeleines/NyonsOlive Tapenade Noir/Pâté de Campagne/Cigarettes
Posts: 14,085
|
Post by UN PLOMBIER NIGHTMARE #blm on Jan 9, 2024 1:43:40 GMT -5
f*** no, two titles at most. i'd be psyched if it was just one even if it'll never happen again. there should be one big title
|
|