|
|
Post by angryfan on Sept 7, 2007 1:47:33 GMT -5
|
|
Cranjis McBasketball
Crow T. Robot
Knew what the hell that thing was supposed to be
Peace Love and Nothing But
Posts: 41,920
|
Post by Cranjis McBasketball on Sept 7, 2007 1:48:40 GMT -5
Wonder how long the media sat on this little gem?
|
|
|
|
Post by angryfan on Sept 7, 2007 1:49:33 GMT -5
Who knows. Not sure if it came out with the other names, or what, but still.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2007 1:54:12 GMT -5
What a shame
|
|
Joie De Vivre
Hank Scorpio
There's always next year.
Posts: 5,278
|
Post by Joie De Vivre on Sept 7, 2007 1:55:13 GMT -5
Let's see the media try to tie this in with wrestling!  |
|
|
|
Post by angryfan on Sept 7, 2007 1:56:35 GMT -5
Let's see the media try to tie this in with wrestling! They will. His name was on the Signatures pharmaceutical list. |
|
|
|
Post by The Great El' PANDA King on Sept 7, 2007 1:56:57 GMT -5
Let's see the media try to tie this in with wrestling! I'm guessing he got them from Zach Gowen while down in the minors. |
|
|
|
Post by The Thread Barbi on Sept 7, 2007 5:11:31 GMT -5
I know someone who isn't. Roger Federer  |
|
|
|
Post by Confused Mark Wahlberg on Sept 7, 2007 11:10:41 GMT -5
Of course everyone is dirty.
People will do anything to gain an advantage.
That's why I laugh when people say, "Well I know Jeter isn't dirty" You know this how?
|
|
|
|
Post by amsiraK on Sept 7, 2007 11:16:28 GMT -5
*looks at thread title*
Short answer: Yes.
Long answer: Yeeeeeeeeeeessss.
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Chucklehead,baby!!! on Sept 7, 2007 12:04:07 GMT -5
he used them prior to 2005...so hes fine. no suspensions coming
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,069
|
Post by Mozenrath on Sept 7, 2007 12:04:20 GMT -5
Wait, did he like WIN a year supply? The phrasing makes it sound like a prize.
|
|
|
|
Post by Josh DELUXE on Sept 7, 2007 12:09:47 GMT -5
I for one think performance enhancing drugs should be legalized and encouraged in sports.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clash, Never a Meter Maid on Sept 7, 2007 12:45:40 GMT -5
I've been loving the whole Ankiel thing so far, and this hit me like a mack truck when I heard about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maidpool w/ Cleaning Action on Sept 7, 2007 12:47:43 GMT -5
It says he got them in 2004?
What's the point of even bringing this up if it can't even effect him legally?
|
|
|
|
Post by Clash, Never a Meter Maid on Sept 7, 2007 12:50:08 GMT -5
It says he got them in 2004? What's the point of even bringing this up if it can't even effect him legally? Ratings. That, and it's still another example of an ongoing problem. |
|
Chainsaw
T
A very BAD man.
It is what it is
Posts: 90,480
|
Post by Chainsaw on Sept 7, 2007 12:51:17 GMT -5
There's a game coming out for the Wii that has the perfect title for the times we live in.
"No More Heroes".
|
|
EvilMasterBetty, Esq.
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Bird...Birdie...birdie......Tiger...Tiger Tiger.....
R2C2 Reporting for duty
Posts: 17,355
|
Post by EvilMasterBetty, Esq. on Sept 7, 2007 12:53:55 GMT -5
wait wasn't this when he was out with surgery or something? Even so, they can't prove he's been using in the last couple years so it doesn't matter. And even if he used in 04, in 3 years it would have very little effect on his play right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Confused Mark Wahlberg on Sept 7, 2007 12:58:16 GMT -5
The reason this is important is because if he had a predilection towards them before, he might still be using him during his current Roy Hobbs impression.
It's hardly 'not important' IMHO.
|
|
|
|
Post by gsguy on Sept 7, 2007 13:49:25 GMT -5
|
|
