|
Post by ultimatekennedy on Nov 2, 2007 10:37:19 GMT -5
That Brother Love one was frightning.
|
|
|
Post by Cactus Jack on Nov 2, 2007 12:49:14 GMT -5
Really bad boy band alert... I love that cover! And, here's a gallery of covers for those of you who don't want to wait half a decade for the WWE's fancy new website to load : www.hoffco-inc.com/wwe/mgs/indexwwf.html
|
|
|
Post by Confused Mark Wahlberg on Nov 2, 2007 13:10:42 GMT -5
Man, Shawn's upper body was way bigger than his chicken legs around this time.
|
|
Linestra
Team Rocket
twitter.com/linestra
Posts: 765
|
Post by Linestra on Nov 2, 2007 13:41:49 GMT -5
|
|
Steveweiser
Dalek
Mickie Mickie You're So Fine... Hey Mickie!
THE GRAPS
Posts: 50,249
|
Post by Steveweiser on Nov 2, 2007 13:50:11 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2007 16:40:02 GMT -5
The Billy Gunn cover might e the worst cover of anything ever.
|
|
|
Post by maxx420 on Nov 2, 2007 16:49:00 GMT -5
Bret Hart features very prominently, though mainly for his slightly homoerotic choice of clothing in a couple of them. www.wwe.com/magazine/10baddest/There's also a link there for the 10 best covers, including that really hot Maria one. EDIT: The 10th worst cover happens to mention "That Canadian Guy". i noticed, and he was hitting the gym. Which when you think of how he died is pretty messed up. Considering their efforts to ret-con him out of existence, they would have realized how much in bad taste it seems to have something like THAT appear on their site.
|
|
|
Post by Twinkies Rule! (so does Tacos) on Nov 2, 2007 16:50:48 GMT -5
I just found this. I just liked it.
|
|
|
Post by Hulkshi Tanahashi on Nov 2, 2007 16:56:05 GMT -5
Just what do they mean by "Fangin' and Bangin'"? Are they going to have sex with girls and bite them?
|
|
|
Post by Bob Schlapowitz on Nov 2, 2007 17:29:57 GMT -5
Funny how 2/3rds of the "best" covers happened between 2004 and 2007. That really pissed me off. I purchased the 500th Issue of WWE Magazine special thinking I would get a peak at the classics of the 80s and early 90's as well as current. Yea right. Almost the entire mag was 2004-current. Oh well, at least their memory is deeper then most of WWE Creative. I'm sorry, I know you probably just want a raise, but when you have a multiple page article on the "Best Stories Pubished" topic, you shouldn't really include EVERYTHING you've done in the past year or two. The reason for that (IMO) is because they'd have to do too much editing and bad photoshopping of Logos if they went further back than that. Jesus Christ, Vince, just pay off the Wildlife Fund already, will ya?
|
|
|
Post by The Hawaiian Hammer! on Nov 2, 2007 19:50:50 GMT -5
Just what do they mean by "Fangin' and Bangin'"? Are they going to have sex with girls and bite them? Or maybe each other?
|
|
|
Post by Dynamite Kid on Nov 2, 2007 20:21:24 GMT -5
Just what do they mean by "Fangin' and Bangin'"? Are they going to have sex with girls and bite them? Well, er...biting usually takes place in the course of sexual intercourse when I'm involved.
|
|
Dean-o
Grimlock
Haha we're having fun Maggle!
Posts: 13,865
|
Post by Dean-o on Nov 2, 2007 20:24:51 GMT -5
That really pissed me off. I purchased the 500th Issue of WWE Magazine special thinking I would get a peak at the classics of the 80s and early 90's as well as current. Yea right. Almost the entire mag was 2004-current. Oh well, at least their memory is deeper then most of WWE Creative. I'm sorry, I know you probably just want a raise, but when you have a multiple page article on the "Best Stories Pubished" topic, you shouldn't really include EVERYTHING you've done in the past year or two. The reason for that (IMO) is because they'd have to do too much editing and bad photoshopping of Logos if they went further back than that. Jesus Christ, Vince, just pay off the Wildlife Fund already, will ya? I can see your point, but if you're going to do it half-assed, you shouldn't do it at all. I was really looking forward to the issue, and I was really let down.
|
|
|
Post by Lance Uppercut on Nov 3, 2007 0:38:07 GMT -5
Thats awesome. That's better. Bah Gawd Keeeng, the Brood are living an alternative lifestyle drinking that slick viscous type liquid!!!!!Why didn't they just say "vampires" and "blood?" ;D Did they frequent Bite clubs w/ Kevin Thorne? I don't think so...
|
|
|
Post by Vice honcho room temperature on Nov 3, 2007 0:40:10 GMT -5
Bah Gawd Keeeng, the Brood are living an alternative lifestyle drinking that slick viscous type liquid!!!!!Why didn't they just say "vampires" and "blood?" ;D Did they frequent Bite clubs w/ Kevin Thorne? I don't think so... K Thorn is a newb to bite clubs compared to the Brood
|
|
|
Post by tankmcquade on Nov 3, 2007 2:35:59 GMT -5
The worst cover ever was the one with Val Venis holding a plate of hot dogs wearing a bow tie...you should have seen the look of the cashier when I brought that up to purchase. Looks...a bit "different" if you know what I mean Here is a picture, That mag cover is a total rip off of the movie Bachelor Party starring Tom Hanks. If you have seen that flick, you would know what Im talkin about.
|
|
|
Post by Jared Has Been Enlightened :) on Nov 3, 2007 6:07:34 GMT -5
The cover of the March 1993 issue should be on the list
|
|
Marky Mark
Samurai Cop
Shut up hooker.
Posts: 2,139
|
Post by Marky Mark on Nov 3, 2007 6:18:58 GMT -5
HEH?
|
|
|
Post by THE Dinobot on Nov 3, 2007 6:24:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by DoubleDare on Nov 3, 2007 12:24:09 GMT -5
Man, I remember having the 1997 predictions issue. Also I hate how on the issues from 98-2002 they edited the wfwf logo out, the least they couldve done was create a wwe bersion that looked like it (It was the WWF Scratch logo with the old wwf logo, which looked kinda cool)
|
|