|
Post by ThE KrUsHer on Dec 15, 2007 15:54:57 GMT -5
LOL U ppl dont really hide ur jealousy well do you. I think the reason so many of you are ragging on Dave Batista is because ur jealous of the man for all that he's got that u want. I have never seen Batista move "like an old man" like u guys say, he is always moving great and I think he moves more like he is 25 rather than his age. I think there is a lot of resentment here due to jealousy As far as Undertakers streak, all it does is HOLD PEOPLE DOWN! Jealously? Ummm ... what? The reason Batista shouldn't defeat 'Taker at WrestleMania is because it doesn't make any sense. Yes it does. Batista's big thorn in his side has always been The Undertaker and Batista beating him at Mania would 1) Make him overcome his thorn and personal enemy. 2) Make Batista into a WWE mainstay. 3) Make Mania more interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Munkie91087 on Dec 15, 2007 15:56:00 GMT -5
Taker never puts people over...Khali...Mark Henry.....Edge....people Taker put over. Lets not forget that Taker let Khali pin him with one foot.
|
|
|
Post by ThE KrUsHer on Dec 15, 2007 15:56:23 GMT -5
LOL U ppl dont really hide ur jealousy well do you. I think the reason so many of you are ragging on Dave Batista is because ur jealous of the man for all that he's got that u want. I yep. Because I know I want a list of enemies longer than my mom's shopping list(My mom owns and manages a restaurant by the way, thus making her shopping lists rather large, with hundreds of items on them) List of enwemies? Who? I sure havent seen any enemies of Batista...perhaps because he can easily kick anyones ass! But maybe by enemies u mean all the women he sleeps with? Because thats prolly as long as your mom's shopping list! LOL!
|
|
Jiren
Patti Mayonnaise
Hearts Bayformers
Posts: 35,163
|
Post by Jiren on Dec 15, 2007 15:57:41 GMT -5
yep. Because I know I want a list of enemies longer than my mom's shopping list(My mom owns and manages a restaurant by the way, thus making her shopping lists rather large, with hundreds of items on them) List of enwemies? Who? I sure havent seen any enemies of Batista...perhaps because he can easily kick anyones ass! Ummm Booker T kicked his ass in a legit fight So that theory is bollocks for starters
|
|
Jack
Team Rocket
Posts: 903
|
Post by Jack on Dec 15, 2007 15:57:55 GMT -5
Put him in a Mr Huges style gimmick and call him The Lash and have him go around as a silent bad ass who just beats people up.
|
|
|
Post by Munkie91087 on Dec 15, 2007 15:58:17 GMT -5
yep. Because I know I want a list of enemies longer than my mom's shopping list(My mom owns and manages a restaurant by the way, thus making her shopping lists rather large, with hundreds of items on them) List of enwemies? Who? I sure havent seen any enemies of Batista...perhaps because he can easily kick anyones ass! But maybe by enemies u mean all the women he sleeps with? Because thats prolly as long as your mom's shopping list! LOL! I finally figured you out. You sir...are Dave Batista. Welcome to the boards, champ, good luck in your match with Undertaker and Edge. Don't forget to drink your milk and take your vitamins.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2007 15:58:35 GMT -5
Jealously? Ummm ... what? The reason Batista shouldn't defeat 'Taker at WrestleMania is because it doesn't make any sense. Yes it does. Batista's big thorn in his side has always been The Undertaker and Batista beating him at Mania would 1) Make him overcome his thorn and personal enemy. 2) Make Batista into a WWE mainstay. 3) Make Mania more interesting. 1. Batista doesn't have to do that at WrestleMania. He could do it on SmackDown, at another PPV, at the Christmas party, in Hawaii, at Best Buy ... I could go on. 2. He's already a mainstay, he cemented that by his win over Triple H at 'Mania 21. 3. It would actually make it less interesting in the years to come, because 'Taker's streak wouldn't exist anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Big Daddy Bad Booking on Dec 15, 2007 15:58:50 GMT -5
No!
|
|
The Line
Patti Mayonnaise
Real Name: Bumkiss. Stanley Bumkiss.
Peanut Butter & JAAAAAMMMM!
Posts: 36,698
|
Post by The Line on Dec 15, 2007 15:58:51 GMT -5
yep. Because I know I want a list of enemies longer than my mom's shopping list(My mom owns and manages a restaurant by the way, thus making her shopping lists rather large, with hundreds of items on them) List of enwemies? Who? I sure havent seen any enemies of Batista...perhaps because he can easily kick anyones ass! Just within the past two of three months Booker T Sharmell Sullivan-Huffman Ariel I hope to god he doesn't try and kick the last two people on that list's asses. And reports said that Booker kicked BATISTA's ass.
|
|
|
Post by -Lithium- on Dec 15, 2007 15:59:45 GMT -5
Of course, WWE did something stupid or maybe Undertaker did some pOLITICAL work if ui know what I mean and got the win.. Takers was there for 17 years, stepped up his game MAJORLY in the past few years, and is one of the most popular superstars of all time. I think its that rather then politics...
|
|
Jack
Team Rocket
Posts: 903
|
Post by Jack on Dec 15, 2007 15:59:51 GMT -5
Put him in a Mr Huges style gimmick and call him The Lash and have him go around as a silent bad ass who just beats people up. I posted this in the wrong thread, but i dont care
|
|
|
Post by Tea & Crumpets on Dec 15, 2007 15:59:57 GMT -5
LOL U ppl dont really hide ur jealousy well do you. I think the reason so many of you are ragging on Dave Batista is because ur jealous of the man for all that he's got that u want. I have never seen Batista move "like an old man" like u guys say, he is always moving great and I think he moves more like he is 25 rather than his age. I think there is a lot of resentment here due to jealousy As far as Undertakers streak, all it does is HOLD PEOPLE DOWN! Jealous? I'm only jealous of the fact that he earns tons of money a year for having pretty much no talent. He's a poor worker, poor promoer, moves with the athletiscism of a crack-addicted tramp, and his body is so vein-poppingly bulked that he looks like he's got spaghetti under his skin. All thatis only my opinion of curse, but I would never want to see Batista end the streak. I'd even take Lashley ending the streak over Batista, simply because he's younger, and Lashley has yet to get over as a top tier guy. He's been highly successful, but didn't deserve or need to end Taker's streak. Personally I don't think it should ever be ended. And hold people down? Orton could never have been a viable main eventer until his feud with Taker. Mark Henry's feud with Taker got him over as a monster until he got injured. Jealously? Ummm ... what? The reason Batista shouldn't defeat 'Taker at WrestleMania is because it doesn't make any sense. Yes it does. Batista's big thorn in his side has always been The Undertaker and Batista beating him at Mania would 1) Make him overcome his thorn and personal enemy. 2) Make Batista into a WWE mainstay. 3) Make Mania more interesting. 1) You do know that's all kayfabe,right? 2) He already is, and IMO sucks at the role. 3) Mania doesn't need that to draw interest and get buys. It's Mania, it always gathers interest.
|
|
|
Post by ThE KrUsHer on Dec 15, 2007 16:00:13 GMT -5
List of enwemies? Who? I sure havent seen any enemies of Batista...perhaps because he can easily kick anyones ass! Ummm Booker T kicked his ass in a legit fight So that theory is bollocks for starters Booker T kicked his ass in a street fight? and you know this how? OH Some nerd made it up on his website www.wrestlingjerkoff.com ? Or did u see it in person? On tape? I'm sorry buddy, I know u might believe in fairies and whatever, but serious people dont believe in crappy rumors that jealous nerds start up online because they dislike someone more succesful then them!
|
|
Jack
Team Rocket
Posts: 903
|
Post by Jack on Dec 15, 2007 16:01:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Dec 15, 2007 16:02:02 GMT -5
Ummm Booker T kicked his ass in a legit fight So that theory is bollocks for starters Booker T kicked his ass in a street fight? and you know this how? OH Some nerd made it up on his website www.wrestlingjerkoff.com ? Or did u see it in person? On tape? I'm sorry buddy, I know u might believe in fairies and whatever, but serious people dont believe in crappy rumors that jealous nerds start up online because they dislike someone more succesful then them! Okay, you can stop right now.
|
|
|
Post by Next Level was WRONG on Dec 15, 2007 16:02:49 GMT -5
You mean there is'nt at least one porn site called that?
|
|
The Line
Patti Mayonnaise
Real Name: Bumkiss. Stanley Bumkiss.
Peanut Butter & JAAAAAMMMM!
Posts: 36,698
|
Post by The Line on Dec 15, 2007 16:03:42 GMT -5
Of course, WWE did something stupid or maybe Undertaker did some pOLITICAL work if ui know what I mean and got the win.. Takers was there for 17 years, stepped up his game MAJORLY in the past few years, and is one of the most popular superstars of all time. I think its that rather then politics... yeah. why is it the most over workers are accused of politics. You go to any SD! taping, and Undertaker will get THE BIGGEST POPS of the night. WWE pushes him because, unlike most people, he has been over pretty much since day one, and has maintained his overness for almost 2 decades.
|
|
|
Post by ThE KrUsHer on Dec 15, 2007 16:04:14 GMT -5
Booker T kicked his ass in a street fight? and you know this how? OH Some nerd made it up on his website www.wrestlingjerkoff.com ? Or did u see it in person? On tape? I'm sorry buddy, I know u might believe in fairies and whatever, but serious people dont believe in crappy rumors that jealous nerds start up online because they dislike someone more succesful then them! Okay, you can stop right now. The truth hurts huh. I know everyone on the internet loves to put down Batista because his supposed fight with Booker T that didnt happen, but sorry to burst your bubbles guys, the truth is that Batista is here to stay and is one of the best things to happen to the company. He's carrying Smackdown right now! Without him we would have atrocious crap like Khali as champ.
|
|
|
Post by Aaron E. Dangerously on Dec 15, 2007 16:04:42 GMT -5
Dave Batista is one of the least talented wrestlers I have ever seen.
He already has a main-event spot, and nobody is holding him down.
If Undertaker puts anybody over at WM, which shouldn't happen, it should be someone like MVP, Matt Hardy, or just anyone whose future doesn't involve torn triceps.
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Dec 15, 2007 16:05:23 GMT -5
Okay, you can stop right now. The truth hurts huh. I know everyone on the internet loves to put down Batista because his supposed fight with Booker T that didnt happen, but sorry to burst your bubbles guys, the truth is that Batista is here to stay and is one of the best things to happen to the company. He's carrying Smackdown right now! Without him we would have atrocious crap like Khali as champ. Actually I meant you can stop trying to purposely piss people off by making up a bunch of random garbage that doesn't make any sense. Now let it go and move on.
|
|