Miz-Wannabe
Don Corleone
Vicariously Living through The Miz
Posts: 1,444
|
Post by Miz-Wannabe on Dec 24, 2007 23:00:31 GMT -5
Edit: I have no evidence to back up the statement made in this post lol
His physique is unbelievable. He has an identity. He is a great wrestler. He also has the most prestige on the roster as an 11 time world champion. Its hard not to respect and admire this guy. Is there anyone better than him overall on the current roster?
|
|
|
Post by Muskrat on Dec 24, 2007 23:02:50 GMT -5
Honestly, Trips is one of the best wrestlers of all time. He did have a couple bad years there but I find find enjoyable for the most part now, and now that he's dropped some muscle mass his mobilty is back up to what it was in 2000. Can't say I've got a real beef with the guy
|
|
|
Post by Solid Stryk-Dizzle on Dec 24, 2007 23:17:52 GMT -5
His physique is unbelievable. He has an identity. He is a great wrestler. He also has the most prestige on the roster as an 11 time world champion. Its hard not to respect and admire this guy. Is there anyone better than him overall on the current roster? Shawn Michaels.
|
|
Miz-Wannabe
Don Corleone
Vicariously Living through The Miz
Posts: 1,444
|
Post by Miz-Wannabe on Dec 24, 2007 23:21:15 GMT -5
His physique is unbelievable. He has an identity. He is a great wrestler. He also has the most prestige on the roster as an 11 time world champion. Its hard not to respect and admire this guy. Is there anyone better than him overall on the current roster? Shawn Michaels. Shawn Michaels isn't as exciting as Triple H. I'm talking about what's current. HBK looks like a old man and sounds like one on the mic. Triple H still has all of his great qualities. HBK was better when he was WWE champ but HHH is better now.
|
|
|
Post by Dave the Dave on Dec 25, 2007 0:05:06 GMT -5
I don't know. I can admit that he's great, at almost all aspects. But he's the only part of RAW I turned off tonight. He needs to switch something up to get me back on his side.
I'm normally a big defender of him, but I'm just bored with him now.
|
|
Miz-Wannabe
Don Corleone
Vicariously Living through The Miz
Posts: 1,444
|
Post by Miz-Wannabe on Dec 25, 2007 0:10:11 GMT -5
Ok fine I may be giving Triple H praise because of his appearance. But he still has all the other qualities to back it up. They called John Cena the Prototype? NO! Triple H is the true Prototype for what all wrestlers should be.
|
|
Miz-Wannabe
Don Corleone
Vicariously Living through The Miz
Posts: 1,444
|
Post by Miz-Wannabe on Dec 25, 2007 0:14:03 GMT -5
Ok fine I may be giving Triple H praise because of his appearance. But he still has all the other qualities to back it up. They called John Cena the Prototype? NO! Triple H is the true Prototype for what all wrestlers should be. Come to think of it, I'm using this as my sig. Triple H: The True Prototype.
|
|
The In-Crowd
ALF
Should've Known Better
In life there are winners..... and losers......... BE JEALOUS
Posts: 1,213
|
Post by The In-Crowd on Dec 25, 2007 0:16:04 GMT -5
Ok fine I may be giving Triple H praise because of his appearance. But he still has all the other qualities to back it up. They called John Cena the Prototype? NO! Triple H is the true Prototype for what all wrestlers should be. Come to think of it, I'm using this as my sig. Triple H: The True Prototype. WTF u just quoted yourself
|
|
|
Post by Vice honcho room temperature on Dec 25, 2007 0:22:43 GMT -5
He eats dog food you know.
|
|
|
Post by machinegun on Dec 25, 2007 0:24:24 GMT -5
Come to think of it, I'm using this as my sig. Triple H: The True Prototype. WTF u just quoted yourself HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHA
|
|
Reverend BTY
Hank Scorpio
Christian Troy: God's Gift
Posts: 7,206
|
Post by Reverend BTY on Dec 25, 2007 0:28:03 GMT -5
Shawn Michaels isn't as exciting as Triple H. I'm talking about what's current. HBK looks like a old man and sounds like one on the mic. Triple H still has all of his great qualities. HBK was better when he was WWE champ but HHH is better now. Just because you're old doesn't mean you suddenly suck. Not only that but there are quite a few wrestlers I find more entertaining than Triple H at the moment. HBK, Jeff Hardy, MVP, and Matt Hardy before his injury being at the top of the list.
|
|
|
Post by machinegun on Dec 25, 2007 0:29:40 GMT -5
HHH isn't anywhere as good as Orton BTW
|
|
|
Post by x on Dec 25, 2007 0:33:06 GMT -5
I could make the CM Punk arguement but I'll go a different route.
John Cena is a better worker in ring and on the stick.
When talking about Matches of the Year (in WWE) 85% of the people will mention John Cena.
Whether it's his matches against Umaga, HBK, Orton. Hell his match with Khali was no 5 star match but he made it watchable.
Superman push or not, Cena is better.
|
|
Reverend BTY
Hank Scorpio
Christian Troy: God's Gift
Posts: 7,206
|
Post by Reverend BTY on Dec 25, 2007 0:38:07 GMT -5
HHH isn't anywhere as good as Orton BTW I disagree. Orton always has that one dead inside emotion that bothers the crap out of me.
|
|
Miz-Wannabe
Don Corleone
Vicariously Living through The Miz
Posts: 1,444
|
Post by Miz-Wannabe on Dec 25, 2007 0:38:46 GMT -5
I could make the CM Punk arguement but I'll go a different route. John Cena is a better worker in ring and on the stick. When talking about Matches of the Year (in WWE) 85% of the people will mention John Cena. Whether it's his matches against Umaga, HBK, Orton. Hell his match with Khali was no 5 star match but he made it watchable. Superman push or not, Cena is better. How better? Cena is a better wrestler than Triple H? John is ok but come on...
|
|
Reverend BTY
Hank Scorpio
Christian Troy: God's Gift
Posts: 7,206
|
Post by Reverend BTY on Dec 25, 2007 0:45:41 GMT -5
I could make the CM Punk arguement but I'll go a different route. John Cena is a better worker in ring and on the stick. When talking about Matches of the Year (in WWE) 85% of the people will mention John Cena. Whether it's his matches against Umaga, HBK, Orton. Hell his match with Khali was no 5 star match but he made it watchable. Superman push or not, Cena is better. How better? Cena is a better wrestler than Triple H? John is ok but come on... Actually the original poster makes a good point. Over the last year, which of the two has had better matches? Very little of this past year from HHH has really wowed me.
|
|
|
Post by Jared Has Been Enlightened :) on Dec 25, 2007 0:49:56 GMT -5
Point blank - Triple H is an upper-midcarder who married his way into the main event.
Explain to me what the guy has done to EARN 11 World Title reigns and a spot main eventing 6 Wrestlemanias?
He's never proven to be a major draw in any way. In fact, since Triple H was first booked as the biggest star in the company back in 2000, the ratings have plummeted.
This is entirely a case of someone being declared great so often that people have began to believe it as the truth.
Give ______ ______ (fill in the blank) the amount of air time and the push Triple H has been given over the past 8 years and they too would be looked at as a superstar, regardless of actual ability.
Triple H is an above average talent, but he's not a megastar. He's not Hogan, he's not Austin, he's not the Rock, he's not even Angle. He's somewhere between Foley and Y2J.
|
|
Miz-Wannabe
Don Corleone
Vicariously Living through The Miz
Posts: 1,444
|
Post by Miz-Wannabe on Dec 25, 2007 1:07:49 GMT -5
Point blank - Triple H is an upper-midcarder who married his way into the main event. Explain to me what the guy has done to EARN 11 World Title reigns and a spot main eventing 6 Wrestlemanias? He's never proven to be a major draw in any way. In fact, since Triple H was first booked as the biggest star in the company back in 2000, the ratings have plummeted. This is entirely a case of someone being declared great so often that people have began to believe it as the truth. Give ______ ______ (fill in the blank) the amount of air time and the push Triple H has been given over the past 8 years and they too would be looked at as a superstar, regardless of actual ability. Triple H is an above average talent, but he's not a megastar. He's not Hogan, he's not Austin, he's not the Rock, he's not even Angle. He's somewhere between Foley and Y2J. Wow... So you're saying if he didnt marry Steph he would be in the midcard? Give me a break.
|
|
|
Post by Jared Has Been Enlightened :) on Dec 25, 2007 1:10:07 GMT -5
I'm not sure. He may have gotten a few title reigns as he has some talent and "the look", but I know he wouldn't have been booked as THE BEST in the industry for the past 7 years, which is exactly what's happened.
I just can't fathom how a guy who's never been a huge draw has been booked as an equal talent to Hogan and Austin. Then I remember he's married to the boss' daughter and it all becomes crystal clear.
|
|
|
Post by PTBartman on Dec 25, 2007 1:30:31 GMT -5
His physique is unbelievable. He has an identity. He is a great wrestler. He also has the most prestige on the roster as an 11 time world champion. Its hard not to respect and admire this guy. Is there anyone better than him overall on the current roster? I have nothing against Trips, but using the criteria you layed out I'd have to put Undertaker above him.
|
|