|
|
Post by razzle98 on Nov 3, 2007 2:37:29 GMT -5
why is it u ppl complain so much about the big wrestlers, i like the x division and all but havin all x division ppl only in tna would get boring, do u ppl seriously want wrestlers to lose there jobs, just cause they cant do flips and stuff.
|
|
messiah
Don Corleone
Wobbly.
Posts: 1,871
|
Post by messiah on Nov 3, 2007 5:27:01 GMT -5
I disagree, the socio-political situation in the Congo is no where near as volatile as all that. You, good sir, are misinformed!
|
|
|
|
Post by i.Sarita.com on Nov 3, 2007 12:53:39 GMT -5
I disagree, the socio-political situation in the Congo is no where near as volatile as all that. You, good sir, are misinformed! Yes, but what of that of Burkina Faso? |
|
|
|
Post by leemir on Nov 3, 2007 12:54:47 GMT -5
you people
|
|
|
|
Post by thestinger on Nov 3, 2007 12:58:39 GMT -5
I've never once heard of anyone complaining about TNA having big wrestlers.
Mostly because they have three (Abyss, Tomko and Hernandez).
I guess Nash and that Matt Morgan guy are big, but Nash hasn't wrestled for a year and Morgan has yet to have a match in TNA.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 122,180
|
Post by Mozenrath on Nov 3, 2007 13:00:30 GMT -5
I think variety is the spice of life, and that without it, you have a product with a limited amount of appeal.
Look at ECW at times. Yes, they SOMETIMES had luchadores and SOMETIMES had ring technicians, but then there were the times when all you really had was Sandman, New Jack, and the Dudleyz.
Like how Foley put it, wrestling is a circus. You don't like the elephants, enjoy the tightrope, or watch the clowns.
ECW was often a series of guys getting blasted out of cannons.
|
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Nov 3, 2007 13:01:32 GMT -5
y duz my hed hert wen eye hit it wit a hammer?  ???878??? |
|
|
|
Post by thestinger on Nov 3, 2007 13:03:26 GMT -5
I think variety is the spice of life, and that without it, you have a product with a limited amount of appeal. True, but TNA has mostly smaller guys, so it's smart to tailer the product to emphasize their strengths. Actually, having so few huge guys makes the Tomko's seem more special. |
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Nov 3, 2007 13:07:05 GMT -5
Brother Ray is posting here under an alias now? Interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Awesome Waffle on Nov 3, 2007 13:10:26 GMT -5
Well, it's not like everybody is freakishly big. Most guys, quite frankly, are the size of the various guys in TNA. Of course WWE seems to monopolize on most of the big wrestlers because that's what Vince likes, and TNA goes with what they can get obviously. Still, I gotta admit that TNA has some impressive big men, namely Tomko and Hernadez.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lenny: Smooth like Keith Stone on Nov 3, 2007 13:10:59 GMT -5
"I don't wanna see anyone LOSIN DER JERBS!!!! DERKA DER!"  |
|
|
|
Post by Munkie91087 on Nov 3, 2007 13:17:30 GMT -5
I disagree, it's a very good game, but I think Donkey Kong is the greatest game of all time.
|
|
|
|
Post by i.Sarita.com on Nov 3, 2007 13:24:44 GMT -5
Besides, the "big guys" that TNA does have are better overall wrestlers than a lot of the muscle heads that Vince hires....
I'd take Tomko, Hernandez, and Abyss over Masters, Henry, Khali anyday...but that's just me...
|
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Nov 3, 2007 13:39:43 GMT -5
Besides, the "big guys" that TNA does have are better overall wrestlers than a lot of the muscle heads that Vince hires.... I'd take Tomko, Hernandez, and Abyss over Masters, Henry, Khali anyday...but that's just me... but I'd take Triple H, Undertaker, Kane, Umaga over those guys. |
|
Zane
Team Rocket
GREATEST POWERBOMB EVER!
Posts: 959
|
Post by Zane on Nov 3, 2007 13:42:13 GMT -5
Besides, the "big guys" that TNA does have are better overall wrestlers than a lot of the muscle heads that Vince hires.... I'd take Tomko, Hernandez, and Abyss over Masters, Henry, Khali anyday...but that's just me... but I'd take Triple H, Undertaker, Kane, Umaga over those guys. But I'd take Sabin, Shelley, Petey Williams, and Raven over those guys. |
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Nov 3, 2007 13:47:14 GMT -5
but I'd take Triple H, Undertaker, Kane, Umaga over those guys. But I'd take Sabin, Shelley, Petey Williams, and Raven over those guys. those aren't big guys |
|
hollywood
King Koopa
the bullet dodger
The Green Arrow has approved this post.
Posts: 11,122
|
Post by hollywood on Nov 3, 2007 13:51:08 GMT -5
But I'd take Sabin, Shelley, Petey Williams, and Raven over those guys. those aren't big guys I beg to differ. As we all know, Sabin is, in actuality, larger than the entire known universe. |
|
|
|
Post by Adam Pacman Khan (akkilla) on Nov 3, 2007 14:42:13 GMT -5
But I'd take Sabin, Shelley, Petey Williams, and Raven over those guys. those aren't big guys Triple H isnt a big guy. he is a good jam up guy however. |
|
|
|
Post by i.Sarita.com on Nov 3, 2007 14:47:53 GMT -5
but I'd take Triple H, Undertaker, Kane, Umaga over those guys. But I'd take Sabin, Shelley, Petey Williams, and Raven over those guys. Or even Joe, Christian, AJ, and Daniels |
|
wwerules60
El Dandy
"Bring what? a vomit bag? a fig newton?"
Posts: 8,999
|
Post by wwerules60 on Nov 3, 2007 14:56:01 GMT -5
Triple H isnt a big guy. he is a good jam up guy however. He is bigger than Hernandez |
|
