Crappler El 0 M
Dalek
Never Forgets an Octagon
I'm a good R-Truth.
Posts: 58,479
|
Post by Crappler El 0 M on Dec 29, 2008 19:12:45 GMT -5
Seems like they have settled on 90 seconds, but what time interval do you think works best?
|
|
|
|
Post by Robbymac on Dec 29, 2008 19:14:32 GMT -5
2 minutes or 90 seconds both work fine, but I prefer 2 minutes. Just so long as we never, EVER, go back to 60 seconds.
|
|
|
|
Post by MGH on Dec 29, 2008 19:15:40 GMT -5
2 minutes is ideal for me. 90 is fine, just NEVER 60.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nic Nemeth on Dec 29, 2008 19:16:01 GMT -5
90 seconds is the best.
1 minute is too short and 2 minutes is too long.
90 seconds is perfect in case they do an elimination spree.
|
|
|
|
Post by stinger on Dec 29, 2008 19:16:47 GMT -5
2:00...Rumble is my favorite match of the year, so I like it to last as long as possible.
|
|
The Line
Patti Mayonnaise
Real Name: Bumkiss. Stanley Bumkiss.
Peanut Butter & JAAAAAMMMM!
Posts: 36,698
|
Post by The Line on Dec 29, 2008 19:17:16 GMT -5
I wish they would maybe do 2 minutes between 2 and 3, and then 90 seconds after.
|
|
Steveweiser
Dalek
Mickie Mickie You're So Fine... Hey Mickie!
THE GRAPS
Posts: 50,249
|
Post by Steveweiser on Dec 29, 2008 19:17:54 GMT -5
They barely get away with claiming "the fastest 60 minutes of the year" when it's 90 seconds, as they just about get enough wrestling in at the end to get it past 60. With it as 2 minutes, an hour's wrestling is guaranteed.
|
|
Convoy
El Dandy
Rusev admits to being a sex addict to large applause.
Posts: 7,516
|
Post by Convoy on Dec 29, 2008 19:19:18 GMT -5
90 seconds seems to work nicely.
|
|
Crappler El 0 M
Dalek
Never Forgets an Octagon
I'm a good R-Truth.
Posts: 58,479
|
Post by Crappler El 0 M on Dec 29, 2008 19:19:53 GMT -5
I'll chime in. I definitely prefer two minutes. I have been watching a lot of Rumble matches lately and I feel that the two minute interval just seems like a nice amount of time between entrants. Sometimes 90 seconds seems like it isn't long enough. I can understand why it changed as it can potential cut out 15 minutes of time fromt he match to spend on other segments, matches, promos, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Dec 29, 2008 19:27:04 GMT -5
2:00 to :90 is fine by me. :60 is way too short. If you are going to have someone go on a tear and throw out everyone, then :90 as 2:00 can leave too much of a gap.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkshi Tanahashi on Dec 29, 2008 19:27:14 GMT -5
I prefer 2 minutes, but I'm okay with 90 seconds.
|
|
Agent P
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wooo
Posts: 18,180
|
Post by Agent P on Dec 29, 2008 19:53:00 GMT -5
I've grown to prefer 90 seconds, since it leads to a longer ending then usual.
By the way, 2 minute intervals only guarenteed you 56 minutes, not 60.
|
|
Marvelously Mediocre
Fry's dog Seymour
Beggin' for a little SWAGGAH!
Haha. What a story Mark.
Posts: 21,224
|
Post by Marvelously Mediocre on Dec 29, 2008 19:55:15 GMT -5
90's plenty.
|
|
CM Dazz
King Koopa
Chuck
Posts: 10,475 
|
Post by CM Dazz on Dec 29, 2008 20:07:53 GMT -5
I've grown to prefer 90 seconds, since it leads to a longer ending then usual. By the way, 2 minute intervals only guarenteed you 56 minutes, not 60. I prefer 2 minutes. And technically you are correct, but you are almost guaranteed an hour plus match. |
|
|
|
Post by blef on Dec 29, 2008 20:16:42 GMT -5
They've adjusted themselves rather well to 90 seconds over the years. I think 2 minutes would be too long considering how the workrate has changed since 1993...
|
|
mattperiolat
King Koopa
Thank you, Brodie... for everything.
Posts: 11,403
|
Post by mattperiolat on Dec 29, 2008 20:18:54 GMT -5
This isn't even a contest. 2 minutes easy. I could live with 90 seconds, but I've always felt that the Rumble is a masterpiece and you really need a big canvas to tell all the stories. If you're just rushing guys in and out of the ring, you end up with a finger painting instead of Rembrandt.
|
|
