|
Post by i.Sarita.com on Nov 29, 2009 6:05:08 GMT -5
I'm not saying it sucks before I see it...BUT three different theatres full of people who saw the trailer for this laughed HARD. THREE different full theatres cracking on a movie based on the trailer. That can't be a good sign.
|
|
|
Post by Solid Stryk-Dizzle on Nov 29, 2009 6:07:45 GMT -5
I remember one guy in my theater saying "These X-men origin movies have gone too far." during one of the trailers.
|
|
Lick Ness Monster
Dennis Stamp
From the eerie, eerie depths of Lake Okabena
Posts: 4,874
|
Post by Lick Ness Monster on Nov 29, 2009 9:43:44 GMT -5
Not only that, but a few people were bold enough to go in the official Star Trek thread, and say it wasn't absolutely brillaint. They were summarily flamed, trolled, and bashed into oblivion and chased out of the thread. Don't believe me? Ask TR. Here I was all ready to click on that video and feel validated in my thoughts that this movie isn't a half-step below Citizen Kane, and here it's just another fluff piece (albeit slightly funny) that goes on and on about how it's this absolutely marvelous cinematic offering personally touched by the hand of God that seemingly everyone else besides me thinks it is.
|
|
|
Post by Bobafett on Nov 29, 2009 12:01:02 GMT -5
I'm sorry but I will NEVER watch the Star Trek film because Simon Pegg should NEVER have been Scotty, and the messing with the timeline crap and it was a shameless attempt to cash in on the "reimaginings" that are happening..just like Enterprise was trying to cash in on the prequel thing years back
as for Avatar, its different, its interesting, but because its a big budget effects laden movie people are gonna hate on it to seem trendy at least give it some credit for origionality and actually watch it
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Nov 29, 2009 12:12:50 GMT -5
So, let's see...I argued that every major film on here has a backlash but Star Trek, and I find out even that one had one. Yeah, this totally makes me want to take the WC company line on Avatar.
|
|
|
Post by Red Impact on Nov 29, 2009 12:49:43 GMT -5
And you know what? He's absolutely right.
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Nov 29, 2009 12:51:20 GMT -5
And you know what? He's absolutely right. And actresses get so much airbrushing in pics that they might as well be CGI anyway these days.
|
|
|
Post by JaySticLe respects Umaga on Nov 29, 2009 13:34:05 GMT -5
Not only that, but a few people were bold enough to go in the official Star Trek thread, and say it wasn't absolutely brillaint. They were summarily flamed, trolled, and bashed into oblivion and chased out of the thread. Don't believe me? Ask TR. Here I was all ready to click on that video and feel validated in my thoughts that this movie isn't a half-step below Citizen Kane, and here it's just another fluff piece (albeit slightly funny) that goes on and on about how it's this absolutely marvelous cinematic offering personally touched by the hand of God that seemingly everyone else besides me thinks it is. You know what? I am also in the "Star Trek Isn't The Best Movie Ever" group.
|
|
|
Post by Milkman Norm on Nov 29, 2009 13:57:26 GMT -5
Here's what I don't understand. Cameron says he wanted her to have breast even though the speicies doesn't need them to feed there young. Um, Jim didn't you create this whole planet? If you want the woman to have boobs, why not give them boobs? It's not like it's based off of anything real.
|
|
Lick Ness Monster
Dennis Stamp
From the eerie, eerie depths of Lake Okabena
Posts: 4,874
|
Post by Lick Ness Monster on Nov 29, 2009 14:03:20 GMT -5
this is how i feel about the movie: Same here. Dances With Smurfs essentially sums it up, doesn't it? ;D
|
|
Dave at the Movies
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
VINTAGE D-DAY DAVE! Always cranking dat thing.
Posts: 18,228
|
Post by Dave at the Movies on Nov 29, 2009 15:53:25 GMT -5
Well, it ain't Terminator.
|
|
|
Post by i.Sarita.com on Nov 29, 2009 15:58:02 GMT -5
as for Avatar, its different, its interesting, but because its a big budget effects laden movie people are gonna hate on it to seem trendy at least give it some credit for origionality and actually watch it Um....except it looks like Halo.
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Nov 29, 2009 16:28:37 GMT -5
Avatar isn't original at all, and James Cameron ought to be sued for plagarism. This is the plot summary to the 1957 novel "Call Me Joe" by Poul Anderson:
"Call Me Joe" was eventually put in the Science Fiction hall of fame. Anderson had just one other book that became fairly popular. You know what that book was? 1978's "The Avatar".
James Cameron is ripping off a dead writer, and hoping that because the work is old and obscure enough, no one will notice.
|
|
|
Post by Ultimo Chocula on Nov 29, 2009 17:43:44 GMT -5
For the record. I'm not bagging on Avatar because it's the cool thing to do, because I'm being overly cynical, or because I'm anti big budget CGI pictures.
I'm bagging on it because it looks TERR-I-BULL!!!
|
|
B.B.M
Hank Scorpio
Scavenger Hunt All-Star
Where did the Lime go?
Posts: 7,404
|
Post by B.B.M on Nov 29, 2009 17:47:11 GMT -5
If the first thing you though about this film was "Furries", you need some time of the internet.
|
|