The Possum
Unicron
JBL stands for "Just Beat a Lizard".
Posts: 3,013
|
Post by The Possum on Nov 17, 2009 2:35:28 GMT -5
I think it's definitely Undertaker.
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Nov 17, 2009 2:38:06 GMT -5
Tie between Vader and Bam Bam Bigelow. They were both wasted in the WWF, but watch them in Japan, WCW and ECW respectively and you'll see how damn good they both were.
|
|
MolotovMocktail
Grimlock
Home of the 5-time, 5-time, 5-time, 5-time 5-time Super Bowl Champion 49ers-and Wrestlemania 31
Posts: 14,054
|
Post by MolotovMocktail on Nov 17, 2009 2:38:37 GMT -5
Vader, just ahead of Brock Lesnar.
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Nov 17, 2009 2:40:34 GMT -5
I forgot about Lesnar completely. If he'd stuck with pro wrestling, he easily could have become the best all-time big man wrestler.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bubble Lead on Nov 17, 2009 2:41:12 GMT -5
Vader, just ahead of Brock Lesnar. Agreed on all points. |
|
The Ichi
Patti Mayonnaise
AGGRESSIVE Executive Janitor of the Third Floor Manager's Bathroom
Posts: 37,642 
|
Post by The Ichi on Nov 17, 2009 3:42:45 GMT -5
Needs an Umaga option.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rorschach on Nov 17, 2009 3:45:34 GMT -5
Tie between Vader and Bam Bam Bigelow. They were both wasted in the WWF, but watch them in Japan, WCW and ECW respectively and you'll see how damn good they both were. Took the words right out of my mouth. I voted for Bammer, though, seeing as to how much love vader is getting. |
|
|
|
Post by Angus Mcloud on Nov 17, 2009 3:48:24 GMT -5
Bam Bam Bigelow. I've always felt that Vader was a bit overrated and Bam Bam was criminally underrated
|
|
|
|
Post by Hassan bin Sober on Nov 17, 2009 3:56:14 GMT -5
Why is Sid not on this list?
|
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Nov 17, 2009 5:47:35 GMT -5
I voted for Andre
And I suspect Sid is not on the list because he sucks.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheDarkestKnight on Nov 17, 2009 6:31:30 GMT -5
I pick Undertaker.
|
|
|
|
Post by Schattenjager on Nov 17, 2009 6:48:12 GMT -5
Bam Bam Bigelow was definately the greatest big man in his generation. There's no competition. Brock Lesnar and The Undertaker both deserve mentions, as well. The Undertaker only started being truly on top of his game a few years ago and Lesnar had the tendancy to be a bit sloppy at times.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bubble Lead on Nov 17, 2009 7:06:49 GMT -5
I voted for Andre And I suspect Sid is not on the list because he sucks. Eh, there are other sucky guys on the list. I agree though, Sid really shouldn't be considered among the best big men. Bam Bam should be considered. Always was entertained by the guy and he put on a lot of great matches and was very athletic. Vader is still tops though, I cant see why anyone could make a case that he isn't, unless they ONLY saw his WWF run which isn't fair to him at all. As for Taker, he is good and has definitely improved over time. I would put him in the top five easily. However, I fail to see how he could be considered better than Bigelow and ESPECIALLY Vader. |
|
lionheart21
Patti Mayonnaise
Once did a thing...
Posts: 31,551
|
Post by lionheart21 on Nov 17, 2009 8:04:01 GMT -5
Gotta go with Vader, mainly based on his runs in Japan
|
|
|
|
Post by quantum on Nov 17, 2009 8:53:09 GMT -5
The Undertaker only started being truly on top of his game a few years ago and Lesnar had the tendancy to be a bit sloppy at times. Maybe it has been Takers opponents over the past few years more than anything in the 90's he was put against Giant Gonzalez, Yokozunna, King Kong Bundy, Kama and Sid as well as a few others and those long with his matches against Warrior and Hogan are what is most remembered about Taker from the 90-'s. His first really good feud was against Kane which also gave us his first good Mania match in 1998 and his legandary Hell In A Cell match against Michaels. Which were over 6 and 7 years into his run in the WWF. This decade he has fought against them likes of HBK, Punk, Edge, HHH and Angle. Who are head and shoulders above any of Tkrs 90's feuds and matches in every way. Lesnar was more than a bit sloppy at times shooting star press anyone? Holly neck injury also? |
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,372
|
Post by Push R Truth on Nov 17, 2009 8:54:43 GMT -5
Who is the one you dare not go one on one with?
DA UNDATAKAH
|
|
Johnny Danger (Godz)
Wade Wilson
loves him some cavity searches
Lord Xeen's going to kill you.
Posts: 27,736
|
Post by Johnny Danger (Godz) on Nov 17, 2009 9:11:57 GMT -5
For me, it's easily Vader...but Kane, Taker, Bam Bam, Sid, and Andre are all up there for me as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bubble Lead on Nov 17, 2009 9:24:13 GMT -5
The Undertaker only started being truly on top of his game a few years ago and Lesnar had the tendancy to be a bit sloppy at times. Maybe it has been Takers opponents over the past few years more than anything in the 90's he was put against Giant Gonzalez, Yokozunna, King Kong Bundy, Kama and Sid as well as a few others and those long with his matches against Warrior and Hogan are what is most remembered about Taker from the 90-'s. His first really good feud was against Kane which also gave us his first good Mania match in 1998 and his legandary Hell In A Cell match against Michaels. Which were over 6 and 7 years into his run in the WWF. This decade he has fought against them likes of HBK, Punk, Edge, HHH and Angle. Who are head and shoulders above any of Tkrs 90's feuds and matches in every way. Lesnar was more than a bit sloppy at times shooting star press anyone? Holly neck injury also? The Holly thing was Hollys fault. Not Brocks. Shooting Star Press was just a freak accident, he had done that move many times. It could happen to anyone, hell, Taker pretty much did the same thing this year at WM. |
|
|
|
Post by stormwrestling on Nov 17, 2009 10:12:39 GMT -5
I'm voting for Nash since he has no votes
|
|
|
|
Post by playoldgames on Nov 17, 2009 10:48:27 GMT -5
A toss-up between Taker and Kane - Taker for his enduring longevity and popularity, Kane for his incredible versatility through the years.
Taker just takes it, though.
|
|
