|
Post by KevFalcön07 on Dec 29, 2009 0:46:26 GMT -5
I say no. I was more than satisfied with the way the match turned out, it's Undertaker's best Wrestlemania match...
...and Shawn should not beat the Undertaker, at least not at Wrestlemania. I'm one of the people that don't want the streak to ever end.
|
|
|
Post by American Dragon on Dec 29, 2009 0:46:34 GMT -5
Personally, I'd like to see it. Their match last year was pretty good, and this would mark the first time a wrestler had the courage to face The Undertaker two years in a row at Wrestlemania, and Michaels seems like the perfect guy for that.
As I said, their match last year was good, but I'm pretty confident they could top that match from last year.
|
|
|
Post by taylorandborland on Dec 29, 2009 0:49:34 GMT -5
I'll give my answer in many ways, so it'll be clear:
In English: No. In Spanish: No. In French: No. In Italian: No. And finally, in Ebonics: HELLLLL NAW.
I mean, there's just no logic in doing this match again, at the big PPV, one year later. Yes, it'll be a good match. Yes, it has some draw power. Yes, it has "special match" status. So why not save it for a different pay per view that needs a good headliner?
|
|
Paco
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,145
|
Post by Paco on Dec 29, 2009 0:55:01 GMT -5
DX currently. Just because he doesn't get the single hugest reaction doesn't mean he isn't a draw. Let me rephrase then...a HUGE draw. Like his being at top helped the company make some big bucks type-draw. Shawn at the top didn't really help the WWF.
|
|
Zen411
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 3,746
|
Post by Zen411 on Dec 29, 2009 0:56:53 GMT -5
No thank you.
I liked HBK-Taker last year. I was on the edge of my seat.
The build up was great. Mr WrestleMania vs The Streak. The White coat HBK promo. Have to go to heaven to get to hell.
I dont see them beating that. I dont want Michaels to beat the streak. He retired Flair (in WWE) I dont think he needs another feather in his cap. I dont want the streak to end but if it did, I want it to be an up and comer who needs it and deserves it.
I would rather see something new this year. Jericho, Cena, hell....even Sheamus. Yes I said Sheamus.
|
|
|
Post by brettappedout (BLM) on Dec 29, 2009 1:06:27 GMT -5
I'm split, but leaning towards no because I don't think they'd live up to the first and it'd be 100% because of Taker's health, though he has been looking better in my opinion as he gets more work which is kind of weird.
|
|
|
Post by KingPopper on Dec 29, 2009 1:07:47 GMT -5
I still beleave this is gonna lead to a match at the Rumble or Elimination Chamber. I mean Hogan/Rock 2 did happen but it did at No Way Out. WWE throws everything they can in to making the first months of the year leading to Mania very exciting.
|
|
Professor Chaos
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Bringer of Destruction and Maker of Doom
Posts: 16,332
|
Post by Professor Chaos on Dec 29, 2009 1:33:41 GMT -5
No... I'd rather see Cena/Taker.
|
|
Paco
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,145
|
Post by Paco on Dec 29, 2009 1:59:24 GMT -5
With HBK/Taker, Bret/Vince & maybe Edge/Jericho, it looks the World Title matches at Mania will again involve a combination of Cena, HHH, Orton and (barring another injury) Batista.
Oh Goody. Just as exciting as it was the past 2 Manias. Vince sure is great at making new stars.
|
|
repomark
Unicron
For Mash Get Smash
Posts: 3,049
|
Post by repomark on Dec 29, 2009 8:08:45 GMT -5
I dont see what there would be to gain from a rematch and I also don't see how they could possibly top WM25. I think the Cena v Taker plan is a better one.
|
|
|
Post by Jedi-El of Tomorrow on Dec 29, 2009 8:49:05 GMT -5
It's not just a no, it's an "Oh hell no!"
Do, DX vs Brothers of Destruction. That's a match I'd like to see. It would be easy to build to it. Two big time tag teams that haven't faced each other. It would be a big match for Mania.
Plus it would give Kane a big win at Mania.
|
|
|
Post by wrestlecrapcrap on Dec 29, 2009 9:15:25 GMT -5
No, and I don't think that is where they are going anyway.
I've been thinking long about how they can make HHH/HBK interesting, and I thought it looked like it was where they are going. I don't want DX to split, but if they are going to, then last night looked like it could show how.
A face vs face match would be a bit pointless, since it would be like both men were taking it easy on each other (even if they did the 'despite our friendship...this is Wrestlemania' promos) because they wouldn't be competing for anything, like Flair/HBK had drama because the winner got something.
I can see them using Bret to turn HBK heel (what would be the point of turning HHH and doing the exact same rivalry that took 2 years to finish all over again?) with his promo with Vince last night giving some clues. HHH as the face can say HBK should be putting his differences behind him or something...and then they go from there.
|
|
|
Post by thedavefather on Dec 29, 2009 9:56:14 GMT -5
it is sooo clear what will happen and cause of that i say HELL ya. MARK MY words BRET screws HBK out of the win! MARK MY WORDS!
|
|
Taupy
Don Corleone
Posts: 1,336
|
Post by Taupy on Dec 29, 2009 9:59:53 GMT -5
it is sooo clear what will happen and cause of that i say HELL ya. MARK MY words BRET screws HBK out of the win! MARK MY WORDS! Heel Shawn trying to cheat to end the streak, and Face Bret screwing him? Bring it on.
|
|
|
Post by Unaffiliated on Dec 29, 2009 10:20:52 GMT -5
Not again. Taker winning would be pointless. Shawn winning would spoil the streak everyone seemingly wants protected.
|
|
4real
Wade Wilson
Posts: 27,641
|
Post by 4real on Dec 29, 2009 11:24:33 GMT -5
No... I'd rather see Cena/Taker. Agreed, maybe build HBK vs. Taker for another PPV so its much easier to give HBK a win.
|
|
Soultastic
El Dandy
Only an idiot can be completely happy.
Posts: 7,751
Member is Online
|
Post by Soultastic on Dec 29, 2009 11:25:43 GMT -5
They shouldn't. At least not in Mania, since chances are the match will not be as good. Let them fight in a different PPV, like the HBK vs Angle rematch at Vengeance.
|
|
|
Post by eJm on Dec 29, 2009 11:40:05 GMT -5
No.
As I have said before, Taker/HBK this year was once in a lifetime and the reason I was advocating it for so long.
It was the 25th Wrestlemania The PPV was in Texas. The wrestlers were from Texas and two of the biggest stars to come out of Texas. The fued was subtle, but the crowd did not care, they just wanted to see the match and they blew the roof off the place.
You can't replicate that magic in Arizona on the 26th Wrestlemania, no matter how much Bret Hart you put into it. The crowd will only talk about how the match may or may not live up to the heights of the first one.
|
|
|
Post by Dynamite Kid on Dec 29, 2009 12:38:09 GMT -5
Hell no. Truth be told, while the match itself was great I didn't have any interest in seeing it in the fist place. This. I basically had a giant who cares attitude to this.
|
|
|
Post by AndyUK on Dec 29, 2009 13:45:21 GMT -5
I'm not a fan of seeing the same match at Wrestlemania two years in a row and I'd rather see HBK face HHH and Cena face Taker and the rematch take place at another PPV because I think you're wasting two potential big Mania matches if you have these two face each other again. That being said, I wouldn't be that disappointed if they decided to go with this. I don't want them to wrestle the exact same match though, it has to be different or else it just won't work.
Also, if Shawn won it wouldn't do much to elevate him but at least he is already a legend and isn't going anywhere. Can you imagine if WWE had Lesnar end Taker's streak? It would've been such a waste because he decided that WWE wasn't for him and . They run that risk if they ever give it to a young guy so I think either HBK should end it this year if they do the rematch or it shouldn't end period.
|
|