|
Post by minigolfhool on Dec 24, 2009 20:59:09 GMT -5
Too bad I a) live in completely different part of the world and b) have to go to work about one hour after Raw and Impact finish their broadcasts. I'd love to watch TNA because this evening could be either incredibly bad or good. I wasn't much of Bret fan in the 90ies and I really dislike Hogan, but this might be one of the most significant nights in pro wrestling in many years.
|
|
Krimzon
Crow T. Robot
This guy is the man!
R.I.P. Deadpool
Posts: 43,870
|
Post by Krimzon on Dec 24, 2009 21:17:44 GMT -5
I plan to. There's no excuse for how awful RAW has been recently. Bret Hart or no Bret Hart, I still believe that RAW will be in the toilet that night in terms of quality.
|
|
|
Post by KingPopper on Dec 24, 2009 23:51:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by The Genesis of KoOS on Dec 25, 2009 0:09:26 GMT -5
I'm not supporting Hulk Hogan.
|
|
|
Post by Timmy8271 on Dec 25, 2009 2:38:51 GMT -5
I'll watch Impact on Thursday since they are replaying it anyways.
|
|
|
Post by boomhauer20055 on Dec 28, 2009 6:16:24 GMT -5
I was all excited for Hogan to go to TNA and was planning on watching it
Until WWE signed Brett
|
|
|
Post by Solid Stryk-Dizzle on Dec 28, 2009 12:59:26 GMT -5
I'm not supporting Hulk Hogan. This. BTW, I am part of a Nielsen family so my watching or not watching actually kinda almost matters! Ha!
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,038
Member is Online
|
Post by Mozenrath on Dec 28, 2009 14:31:59 GMT -5
I'll watch Impact on Thursday since they are replaying it anyways. Are they really? If so, then my choice is pretty clear. Why miss out on Bret when you could just watch the replay?
|
|
hollywood
King Koopa
the bullet dodger
The Green Arrow has approved this post.
Posts: 11,122
|
Post by hollywood on Dec 28, 2009 15:16:23 GMT -5
I'm not a Neilson household, so I'll have no influence on things whatsoever. A year or so back, I would've popped in an ROH DVD instead, but now that promotion's kinda lost me, too.
I'll probably just go out with my girlfriend that night, anyway.
|
|
|
Post by HMARK Center on Dec 29, 2009 0:08:57 GMT -5
Kind of funny to see some "I won't support Hogan" posts, considering that's usually my stance on Vince McMahon.
|
|
|
Post by Mayonnaise on Dec 29, 2009 0:11:15 GMT -5
I'll watch Impact on Thursday since they are replaying it anyways. Are they really? If so, then my choice is pretty clear. Why miss out on Bret when you could just watch the replay? You could say the same about Hogan quite easily. RAW is replayed far more than Impact.
|
|
bob
Salacious Crumb
The "other" Bob. FOC COURSE!
started the Madness Wars, Proudly the #1 Nana Hater on FAN
Posts: 78,249
|
Post by bob on Dec 29, 2009 0:14:03 GMT -5
I was all excited for Hogan to go to TNA and was planning on watching it Until WWE signed Brett yup.....
|
|
|
Post by Clarence "Showstealer" Mason on Dec 29, 2009 3:47:26 GMT -5
I'm not supporting Hulk Hogan. Sadly as much as I've loved TNA recently, This. I have no desire to see a wrestling organization with Hogan as a integral part of their storylines. Raw sucks but this is a step in the wrong direction. It's Raw or more likely nothing for me
|
|
|
Post by Evilution E5150 on Dec 29, 2009 5:48:25 GMT -5
they are on different times here as they are on the same network but i will would still watch tna regardless
and record raw, its bret freakin hart
|
|
|
Post by Natalya's Ass Fanboy on Dec 29, 2009 6:56:12 GMT -5
I'm far more excited about TNA than the WWE.
Bret Hart was never that entertaining anyways, which is why the most (only?) interesting thing about the guy is the 'screwjob'. Besides, the WWE is still clueless, so even if they brought back The Rock and Stone Cold with Bret, they'd still manage to make it as dull and predictable as possible.
Give me in-depth storylines. Give me great tag team, lightweight and women's wrestling. Give me unpredictability and excitement. Give me TNA iMPACT!
|
|
KEJB
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,302
|
Post by KEJB on Dec 29, 2009 7:36:26 GMT -5
Surprised to see people not want to watch a great show just because of Hogan, but turn around watch Raw. A Raw that has generally been considered the worst "wrestling" the show for the past couple years.
To each their own I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Clarence "Showstealer" Mason on Dec 29, 2009 9:04:13 GMT -5
Surprised to see people not want to watch a great show just because of Hogan, but turn around watch Raw. A Raw that has generally been considered the worst "wrestling" the show for the past couple years. To each their own I guess. Which is why I said most likely nothing, I have no desire to watch horrible wrestling and the continuation of a storyline that for all intents and purposes in my mind lost all relevance 8-9 years ago. That said I'm more willing to give Bret a go to see if they give him a chance than I do Hogan. I would like to see Bret get a nice sendoff. I have no desire to see Hogan......ever again
|
|
hollywood
King Koopa
the bullet dodger
The Green Arrow has approved this post.
Posts: 11,122
|
Post by hollywood on Dec 29, 2009 9:06:22 GMT -5
I'm far more excited about TNA than the WWE. Bret Hart was never that entertaining anyways, which is why the most (only?) interesting thing about the guy is the 'screwjob'. Besides, the WWE is still clueless, so even if they brought back The Rock and Stone Cold with Bret, they'd still manage to make it as dull and predictable as possible. Give me in-depth storylines. Give me great tag team, lightweight and women's wrestling. Give me unpredictability and excitement. Give me TNA iMPACT! The only interesting thing is the screwjob? Really? His Iron Man Match at WrestleMania XII wasn't interesting? Or his feud with "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, which is often credited as what drove the initial stage of the Attitude Era? Or even the Hart Foundation? Don't get me wrong, support TNA. Watch Impact. Whatever. But calling Bret uninteresting just seems like a bit of a stretch is all.
|
|
|
Post by casualobserver on Dec 29, 2009 13:35:32 GMT -5
So it's either The DX and Hornswoggle Comedy/Variety Show or Hogan's Zeroes. Meh, Ill take option 3 and watch the Fiesta Bowl instead.
|
|
|
Post by lildude8218 on Dec 29, 2009 13:39:24 GMT -5
I'm far more excited about TNA than the WWE. Bret Hart was never that entertaining anyways, which is why the most (only?) interesting thing about the guy is the 'screwjob'. Besides, the WWE is still clueless, so even if they brought back The Rock and Stone Cold with Bret, they'd still manage to make it as dull and predictable as possible. Give me in-depth storylines. Give me great tag team, lightweight and women's wrestling. Give me unpredictability and excitement. Give me TNA iMPACT! The only interesting thing is the screwjob? Really? His Iron Man Match at WrestleMania XII wasn't interesting? Or his feud with "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, which is often credited as what drove the initial stage of the Attitude Era? Or even the Hart Foundation? Don't get me wrong, support TNA. Watch Impact. Whatever. But calling Bret uninteresting just seems like a bit of a stretch is all. Well the Ironman Match is kind of overrated. It's 40 minutes of restholds. Pretty much straight too. Then 22 minutes of action.
|
|