Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2010 6:40:57 GMT -5
It's Buck Futter isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by Metalheadbanger Man on Jun 23, 2010 13:04:41 GMT -5
Hey guys. I've been having computer problems, which is why I've been absent the last few days.
Whoever wrote that tag title match, kudos. That was tremendous. I'm starting to believe that this has been a very solid reign now.
|
|
Dave at the Movies
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
VINTAGE D-DAY DAVE! Always cranking dat thing.
Posts: 18,228
|
Post by Dave at the Movies on Jun 23, 2010 14:46:41 GMT -5
Hey guys. I've been having computer problems, which is why I've been absent the last few days. Whoever wrote that tag title match, kudos. That was tremendous. I'm starting to believe that this has been a very solid reign now. I believe we are the longest reigning tag champs now.
|
|
|
Post by SsnakeBite, the No1 Frenchman on Jun 23, 2010 15:42:48 GMT -5
May we still suggest gimmicks for the Wheel of Misfortune? I think I just had an idea.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2010 16:10:34 GMT -5
Go for it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2010 13:53:52 GMT -5
OK. I'll be determining the match stips tonight, then sending the results out tomorrow afternoon. So if you haven't sent your stuff in yet, please do so ASAP.
|
|
|
Post by Tyfo on Jun 24, 2010 17:09:45 GMT -5
It's The Iron Giant isn't it?
Or no, maybe Ravishing Rob Rude?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2010 17:13:48 GMT -5
Nobody's guessed Skitzo yet?
|
|
Square
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Official Ambassador
Grand Poobah of Scavenger Hunts 2011
Square-Because he looks good at all the right angles.
Posts: 18,702
|
Post by Square on Jun 24, 2010 17:29:20 GMT -5
Nobody's guessed Skitzo yet? Won't we just be getting a complete stranger off the street if we did that
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Jun 24, 2010 18:10:42 GMT -5
So someone still needs to write Neo Het versus the General.
If no one has taken it by Saturday, then I'll do it.
Evil, PM me the results so that I can write it ahead of time.
Ah hell, I practically am calling it now, aren't I?
Screw it. I'll take Neo Het versus The General of the Monkey Army. It'll be bigger, badder, and better than the first time, just you wait.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2010 18:25:55 GMT -5
Awesome, everything's taken.
|
|
littlenaitch
Dennis Stamp
Stylin' and Profilin'
Hall of Famer!!
Posts: 4,160
|
Post by littlenaitch on Jun 24, 2010 20:01:21 GMT -5
I wrote the tag title match. Is the legend that is returning Above Average?
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Jun 24, 2010 20:04:41 GMT -5
Gookermania III needs a Battle Royal amongst a lot of the old members.
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Jun 24, 2010 20:07:29 GMT -5
Also, I am under the impression that every match will be taking a spin on the wheel, is that correct?
Because if either the IF Championship match or Neo Het/The General are not, I'd like to know ASAP because I can write them then.
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Jun 24, 2010 20:20:04 GMT -5
One last thing: I thought of an interesting conflict of interest involving Championship matches.
With the exceptions of the Championship of Honor and the Hardcore Championships, DQ and Count Outs can skew the results because champions retain their belts in those events, but match finishes are not determined by votes, just who wins.
I thought of two ways to address this:
1. The simpler method is that a DQ/Count Out victory for the challenger may only happen if they actually lose the votes.
Example: Jazzman loses the IF Championship to BRB. BRB can win legitimately or he can be counted out or DQ'ed and retain the championship.
2. The more complex method is that members must vote on whether the victory is clean or not. I would say that if the voter says nothing, then the default is assumed to be a clean finish.
Example: If BRB wins the IF Championship and the majority of voters vote for a dirty finish by explicitly saying so, then BRB may finish the match in a dirty manner (BRB gets counted out, the MiB gets DQ'ed for using a weapon on him)
I think that the first option is simpler and takes significantly less thought to do.
That said, of course I wouldn't pull a fast one like that on everyone by getting my character DQ'ed or something because I technically lost, but I figure that the issue should be addressed with preventative measures. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, after all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2010 20:35:43 GMT -5
1. You'll just have to wait and see, Naitch. 2. We'd have to send PMs to the entire alumni list(minus Starshine, Iron Giant, and Titanothere, who all deleted their accounts) and see who's onboard. I had a similar idea last year, actually. 3. I'll send you the info in a moment, BRB. 4. I think that way would be way more complicated than necessary. If both the challenger and Champion are in agreement, I see no harm in doing DQ or countout finishes. But changing the voting system would just be more of a headache than I care to deal with right now.
|
|
Viva
Dennis Stamp
THAT'S MY PURSE! *kick to the groin*
You can dance if you want to.
Posts: 4,099
|
Post by Viva on Jun 24, 2010 20:50:02 GMT -5
One last thing: I thought of an interesting conflict of interest involving Championship matches. With the exceptions of the Championship of Honor and the Hardcore Championships, DQ and Count Outs can skew the results because champions retain their belts in those events, but match finishes are not determined by votes, just who wins. I thought of two ways to address this: 1. The simpler method is that a DQ/Count Out victory for the challenger may only happen if they actually lose the votes. Example: Jazzman loses the IF Championship to BRB. BRB can win legitimately or he can be counted out or DQ'ed and retain the championship.2. The more complex method is that members must vote on whether the victory is clean or not. I would say that if the voter says nothing, then the default is assumed to be a clean finish. Example: If BRB wins the IF Championship and the majority of voters vote for a dirty finish by explicitly saying so, then BRB may finish the match in a dirty manner (BRB gets counted out, the MiB gets DQ'ed for using a weapon on him)I think that the first option is simpler and takes significantly less thought to do. That said, of course I wouldn't pull a fast one like that on everyone by getting my character DQ'ed or something because I technically lost, but I figure that the issue should be addressed with preventative measures. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, after all. How about no? Tie goes to the champion. Problem solved. What I mean by that is, no one loses shine on a DQ or count out, and since the challenger didn't win the votes, they don't get the belt, obviously. Why would anyone book a match a DQ or count out if they won? They should get credit for winning in that case unless they were controlling their own angle and needed it to end a certain way. It also is a good way to let everyone know that the results were a tie. It's not a broken system. No sense in changing it.
|
|
Dave at the Movies
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
VINTAGE D-DAY DAVE! Always cranking dat thing.
Posts: 18,228
|
Post by Dave at the Movies on Jun 25, 2010 3:05:32 GMT -5
Back when I counted up the votes what I would do on a tie is either a result where the time runs out and it is a draw or both men get counted out of the ring. I don't see any better way to do it.
|
|
|
Post by Kris Kobain on Jun 25, 2010 3:18:09 GMT -5
The tie goes to Daniel Bryan
|
|
Dave at the Movies
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
VINTAGE D-DAY DAVE! Always cranking dat thing.
Posts: 18,228
|
Post by Dave at the Movies on Jun 25, 2010 4:07:50 GMT -5
The tie goes to Daniel Bryan Shhh. Disney will hear you and make Seth Drakin fire him. I just thought of something. We really need some more tag teams. We are like back down to two or three again. lol
|
|