|
Post by Citizen Snips Has Left on Mar 26, 2010 22:52:31 GMT -5
I was watching Alfred Hitchcock's "Rebecca" tonight, the only film of his to win Best Picture. I found it simply interminable. It took about an hour to actually get into the plot of the movie, and only the last 10 minutes or so had any spice to it. So disappointed.
So that inspired this thread. Which classic movies have you watched and been completely underwhelmed or unimpressed by? It would also be groovy if you listed a few reasons.
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Mar 26, 2010 23:21:10 GMT -5
From Here to Eternity, despite being a Best Picture, is as stale, unrealistic, and "Old Hollywoodish" as war movies come. Strange because there were plenty of other war films from the same time period that are far superior (Stalag 17, Paths of Glory, A Walk in the Sun) that hold up far better, yet it was, and still is, Eternity that gets the lions' share of critical attention. I think it was considered "edgy" at the time because it was the most brutal film to portray a romantic relationship and had an extremely unflattering portrayal of the military before 'Nam, but these themes have been done so much more in-depth by more recent films that Eternity seems like a very dated and imperfect rendition of the themes by comparison.
Also, something always seemed..."off" to me about Disney's version of Robin Hood. Maybe it's because I saw the Errol Flynn version first and got spoiled, maybe it's because I always considered it derivative of The Jungle Book (even when I was 6, lon before I found out Disney recycled large chunks of animation to reuse from The Jungle Book in Robin Hood!), maybe because I liked Land Before Time better, but something always rubbed me the wrong way about it.
|
|
bob
Salacious Crumb
The "other" Bob. FOC COURSE!
started the Madness Wars, Proudly the #1 Nana Hater on FAN
Posts: 78,420
Member is Online
|
Post by bob on Mar 26, 2010 23:27:35 GMT -5
the Lord of the Rings trilogy and Wizard of Oz
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Mar 26, 2010 23:34:29 GMT -5
Pretty much everything Stanley Kubrick ever directed. I've seen six or seven of his films, and they just aren't my cup of tea. Especially A Clockwork Orange.
|
|
|
Post by DSR on Mar 26, 2010 23:55:06 GMT -5
DRACULA (the 1931 version with Bela Lugosi) - Lugosi is certainly awesome, but none of the rest of the actors are really any good. And Browning's direction of the camera is far too static and boring.
|
|
|
Post by Ultimo Chocula on Mar 27, 2010 0:48:38 GMT -5
DRACULA (the 1931 version with Bela Lugosi) - Lugosi is certainly awesome, but none of the rest of the actors are really any good. Dwight Frye would like a word with you.
|
|
|
Post by BorneAgain on Mar 27, 2010 1:59:11 GMT -5
Two film I technically don't dislike, but don't enjoy as much as others.
-Citizen Kane. From a pure filming standpoint, its a masterpiece, certainly worthy of being seen by any film student. As a story? Eh, I don't find Charles Foster Kane quite as interesting as the film and the critics believe him to be. Great film to analyze in method, lesser film to watch to see engaging characters.
-Wizard of Oz. Someone else noted this film as well, and I think I just find it too cheesy and saccharine to really get into at any point. Dorothy's too sugary, the Wicked Witch too over the top, and the respective friends (Scarecrow Tin Woodsmen, and Lion) just hammy and goofy to enjoy. Return to Oz gets me into the story much better and has me caring far more about Dorothy's fate.
|
|
|
Post by Orange on Mar 27, 2010 2:04:33 GMT -5
It's not really old but I can't stand Scarface. I don't mind f*** being used in movies or in real life, but Scarface takes it WAAAAAAY TO FAR. Seriously I had to shut the movie off, I couldn't take any more.
|
|
|
Post by Rorschach on Mar 27, 2010 2:20:04 GMT -5
It's not really old but I can't stand Scarface. I don't mind f*** being used in movies or in real life, but Scarface takes it WAAAAAAY TO FAR. Seriously I had to shut the movie off, I couldn't take any more. I have friends that felt that way about PULP FICTION. They felt that the language in that movie was just totally overboard, especially use of the n-word and f-word.
|
|
|
Post by Kris Kobain on Mar 27, 2010 4:51:31 GMT -5
Every motherloving Star Wars movie then again I have bad memories tied to them
|
|
|
Post by Johawn on Mar 27, 2010 7:05:59 GMT -5
Blade Runner ![:(](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/sad.png)
|
|
|
Post by Bob Schlapowitz on Mar 27, 2010 7:53:04 GMT -5
2001: A Space Odyssey. I don't think I was ever as bored as I was watching that movie.
|
|
Mozenrath
FANatic
Foppery and Whim
Speedy Speed Boy
Posts: 121,099
|
Post by Mozenrath on Mar 27, 2010 8:00:27 GMT -5
It's not a classic, but it did get an Oscar: Crash couldn't tie Brokeback's shoes.
|
|
|
Post by dlg3000 on Mar 27, 2010 9:30:20 GMT -5
Citizen Kane was boring to me.
|
|
|
Post by bamblink on Mar 27, 2010 10:00:24 GMT -5
any old ones
|
|
|
Post by Alexander The So-so on Mar 27, 2010 10:12:15 GMT -5
Pretty much everything Stanley Kubrick ever directed. I've seen six or seven of his films, and they just aren't my cup of tea. Especially A Clockwork Orange. I have to agree with this. Pulp Fiction also did nothing to live up to the hype for me.
|
|
Y2M
Dennis Stamp
Posts: 4,757
|
Post by Y2M on Mar 27, 2010 10:50:36 GMT -5
Pulp Fiction and the Shawshank Redemption.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2010 11:12:43 GMT -5
Kubricks rendition of "The Shining" was too far astray from the original novel for my liking and I was not a fan of Pirates or Lord of the Rings...then again I enjoyed Jar Jar so what the hell do I know
|
|
|
Post by Clash, Never a Meter Maid on Mar 27, 2010 11:33:08 GMT -5
Just 2001, really. And normally I love Stanley Kubrick.
|
|
|
Post by ritt works hard fo da chickens on Mar 27, 2010 12:31:14 GMT -5
Of the modern classics. Moulin Rouge
Of the real classics, Gone With the Wind. I just can't stand anything about this. While watching this I just want to build a time machine and go back in time and napalm the entire confederacy.
Also as beautiful as she was, any film with Marilyn Monroe in it is only as good as the rest of the cast.
|
|