|
Post by Ryushinku on Apr 29, 2010 18:39:02 GMT -5
Has the Thursday replay rating ever out-drawn the Monday one yet?
The show today has as good a chance as any I guess.
|
|
MrBRulzOK
Wade Wilson
Mr No-Pants Heathen
Something Witty Here.
Posts: 26,719
|
Post by MrBRulzOK on Apr 29, 2010 19:21:22 GMT -5
Has the Thursday replay rating ever out-drawn the Monday one yet? The show today has as good a chance as any I guess. Actually, I believe that it did one week. I'm fuzzy on when it was, but it was probably around when they first moved to Monday nights.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Apr 29, 2010 21:35:43 GMT -5
Wait. If the replay is going on now, then how'd they get the replay rating already?
|
|
|
Post by Ryushinku on Apr 30, 2010 3:44:16 GMT -5
They haven't, that was for the 22nd April replay.
I don't know why it was posted here.
|
|
|
Post by Kris Kobain on Apr 30, 2010 5:07:14 GMT -5
Raw only did a 3.1, and considering it was the Draft show, that's not great. Much much much much better than 0.5, but I'm guessing something was on last night that attracted some of the usual 'tune in if nothing else is on' wrestling audience? I can only think of one thing..... HOCKEY!!!!!!!! That's what I was mostly watching. The NBA was on too....or so I'm told...
|
|
Steveweiser
Dalek
Mickie Mickie You're So Fine... Hey Mickie!
THE GRAPS
Posts: 50,249
|
Post by Steveweiser on Apr 30, 2010 17:01:15 GMT -5
The replay did 155,000 more viewers than Monday. Further evidence that Impact should go back to Thursday nights.
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Apr 30, 2010 17:07:46 GMT -5
The replay did 155,000 more viewers than Monday. Further evidence that Impact should go back to Thursday nights. Stick a fork in Monday Night Impact, it's done.
|
|
|
Post by Natalya's Ass Fanboy on Apr 30, 2010 17:08:27 GMT -5
Does anyone know a website that has a list of past and present iMPACT! ratings? Gerweck use to, but for whatever reason they stopped in January. I mean, I could just look them up manually, one by one, but God that would be tedious. Thanks in advance to anyone who can help.
|
|
Steveweiser
Dalek
Mickie Mickie You're So Fine... Hey Mickie!
THE GRAPS
Posts: 50,249
|
Post by Steveweiser on Apr 30, 2010 17:11:59 GMT -5
Does anyone know a website that has a list of past and present iMPACT! ratings? Gerweck use to, but for whatever reason they stopped in January. I mean, I could just look them up manually, one by one, but God that would be tedious. Thanks in advance to anyone who can help. Gerweck haven't stopped. www.gerweck.net/ratings.htm
|
|
|
Post by Natalya's Ass Fanboy on Apr 30, 2010 17:18:03 GMT -5
Does anyone know a website that has a list of past and present iMPACT! ratings? Gerweck use to, but for whatever reason they stopped in January. I mean, I could just look them up manually, one by one, but God that would be tedious. Thanks in advance to anyone who can help. Gerweck haven't stopped. www.gerweck.net/ratings.htmMy bad, I was looking at this link www.gerweck.net/ratings10.htm. I was wondering why they would all of a sudden stop... Anyways, thanks, it's much appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by donners on Apr 30, 2010 17:19:59 GMT -5
From PW Torch:
|
|
|
Post by Natalya's Ass Fanboy on Apr 30, 2010 17:24:53 GMT -5
Since it's pretty much universally accepted that TNA needs another show, what about doing a one-hour show Monday nights, 8-9 EST, and then moving the two-hour iMPACT! back to it's old Thursday time slot?
This gives them three hours of prime time TV coverage a week, keeps the Monday night time slot to try and leech some of the wrestling fans waiting around for RAW to come on, and gives them their old home back, full-time.
They could air the one-hour show live weekly, and then record that week's iMPACT! episode immediately after.
|
|
AriadosMan
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Your friendly neighborhood superhero
Posts: 15,620
|
Post by AriadosMan on Apr 30, 2010 17:29:10 GMT -5
8-9 show would be good, since that's clearly the higher rated of the two hours.
It should be the X-Div show, showcase the best matches TNA has to offer, rather than the storylines (which aren't drawing big now).
|
|
|
Post by GaTechGrad on Apr 30, 2010 19:44:11 GMT -5
TNA would be crazy to "move back to Thursday night".
Currently, they have four hours of exposure on Spike TV a week. Going back to Thursday as their only show would cut their overall exposure by half. Also, having their first run on Thursday may also prevent them from doing live shows, since their schedule has always been Monday and Tuesday every other week.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2010 19:49:55 GMT -5
TNA would be crazy to "move back to Thursday night". Currently, they have four hours of exposure on Spike TV a week. Going back to Thursday as their only show would cut their overall exposure by half. Also, having their first run on Thursday may also prevent them from doing live shows, since their schedule has always been Monday and Tuesday every other week. They could always change the schedule and go live on the night that brought them consistant 1.0+ ratings this past year. Changing the schedule wouldn't be that hard to do. They could run live on Thursdays and then do another show/repeat on Saturday night. They'd probably get more viewers than they do now. Then again a rerun of Predator would get a higher rating.
|
|
|
Post by Spankymac is sick of the swiss on Apr 30, 2010 19:58:26 GMT -5
Since it's pretty much universally accepted that TNA needs another show, what about doing a one-hour show Monday nights, 8-9 EST, and then moving the two-hour iMPACT! back to it's old Thursday time slot? This gives them three hours of prime time TV coverage a week, keeps the Monday night time slot to try and leech some of the wrestling fans waiting around for RAW to come on, and gives them their old home back, full-time. They could air the one-hour show live weekly, and then record that week's iMPACT! episode immediately after. This would honestly be the best option. Move Impact back to Thursday to go good ratings for the main show, then have an hour-long show from 8-9 on Mondays to try to catch viewers waiting around for Raw. TNA basically wins no matter what in that instance.
|
|
|
Post by darbus alan on Apr 30, 2010 20:12:14 GMT -5
Yeah, I like the sound of that. Keeps them on Monday Nights and keeps them out of the way of both RAW and I think Monday Night Football once it starts up again. And then have the two hour show on Thursday be the first run and get a stronger rating. TNA would get to have its cake and eat it, too.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew is Good on Apr 30, 2010 20:23:23 GMT -5
They need to go back to Thursday. And have no replay on Monday. They have an established base on Thursday, even though they lost a chunk of it. Maybe they can somehow salvage the damage done by Hogan and company.
|
|
Celgress
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
The Superior One
Posts: 19,009
|
Post by Celgress on Apr 30, 2010 20:29:36 GMT -5
The replay did 155,000 more viewers than Monday. Further evidence that Impact should go back to Thursday nights. Stick a fork in Monday Night Impact, it's done. So it would appear. ....But than again ya never know, brother! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Arturo Classico on Apr 30, 2010 20:29:53 GMT -5
TNA gets a Rating of a .05?
|
|