|
Post by pink on Dec 29, 2010 21:22:17 GMT -5
Seeing how bad the Tag division is now, was it really such a hot idea to unify the World and WWE Tag Team belts? There was a good deal of teams before the unification of the belts, which means more teams would be able to hold a belt and stay together, but now that there is only one belt, the need for Tag Teams (supposedly) was less demanding and so more teams were cut. Then again, it might be hard to blame the lack of teams on the unification.
Either way, what do you think?
|
|
|
Post by KAMALARAMBO: BOOMSHAKALAKA!!! on Dec 29, 2010 21:28:49 GMT -5
I'd say so for two main reasons.
1. The company doesn't really have the depth of talent for one tag division, let alone two.
2. There are still way too many championship titles in the WWE so any reduction is good.
|
|
|
Post by Indifference Abounds on Dec 29, 2010 21:48:46 GMT -5
I'd say it's the right idea given the circumstances but really not what they should be aiming for.
In the past, they did a pretty good job of maintaining tag divisions on both shows, even though there were quite a few thrown-together teams. If they had sufficient teams to have competitive divisions on both shows, I'd be thoroughly in favour of them separating the belts again.
The problem is, as Monsters pointed out, that they unified the belts to deal with a lack of competition and have only let them stagnate further since. While the division hasn't truly benefited from the change, it means things aren't as blatantly ridiculous as if they had two titles.
Personally I'd far rather see two well-established titles than one but, given the decisions they've made, it seems more sensible to have one threadbare division than two.
|
|
|
Post by MichaelMartini on Dec 30, 2010 1:11:32 GMT -5
Too hard to tell because that division is so neglected.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2010 1:37:59 GMT -5
I don't think there's any question that it was a good idea. They can't even maintain interest in one belt, much less two.
I think the WWE tag titles are historic in that you actually become LESS OVER by having them. Having the tag belts these days says "The people holding these belts are so worthless, we put them in a tag team."
They went from 2 tag belts to 1. They should probably go from 1 to 0 now.
|
|
percymania
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Percymania will live forever! Oh yeah!
Posts: 17,296
|
Post by percymania on Dec 30, 2010 1:40:43 GMT -5
The two tag championships never made sense to me and I was really happy when they finally merged them for good.
|
|