|
Post by clashofchampains on May 11, 2011 19:45:25 GMT -5
I don't know...ever since she and Angelina became faces, everytime they've come out to the ring we've heard crickets. I wouldn't call it her being over. Except that last Impact for some reason, TNA has decided to focus on her. TBP especially Velvet do get a reaction. Velvet been getting some very good reactions lately so I don't get why you would say that. Also as pointed out Velvet has been TNA for 4 years and is probably one the most popular woman in the company. So hopefully she will finally get a proper in ring push this time. Popular on what basis? Nobody can say anybody is over in TNA. Probably only AJ gets a reaction.
|
|
|
Post by Andy Martin on May 12, 2011 19:14:59 GMT -5
Velvet's backside has never wowed me like Stacy's did (and still does). Velvet has a regular nice white girl ass. She may not even be in the top 3 of TNA today... Sarita, arguably Angelina and, if she's still there, Taylor Wilde...they all got a more impressive backside than Sky, IMO. Stacy's ass is in the top 2 in all of wrestling history (other one is Trish). Don't forget Miss Tessmacher, So Cal Val and Christy's to a point (she has kinda lost hers over the years). So in all honesty except Madison and Tara, Velvet has like the worst ass in TNA I'd put Madison's above Velvets too.
|
|
|
Post by skracic on May 12, 2011 21:39:49 GMT -5
Is lame, Stacy Keibler made that popular a decade ago, plus Stacy Looked better. That's all Fully agree. Velvet has no hips and comically fake boobs. VERY overrated AND she cuts horrible annoying promos that make her even less attractive.
|
|
Krazee
Salacious Crumb
Posts: 71,547
|
Post by Krazee on May 12, 2011 22:05:55 GMT -5
People like Velvet Sky because she doesn't wear a lot of clothes and shows her ass. Fact. That's pretty much it. You're saying that like it's a bad thing. it is bad, VERY BAD
|
|
SAJ Forth
Wade Wilson
Jamaican WCF Crazy!
Half Man-Half Amazing
Posts: 27,214
|
Post by SAJ Forth on May 13, 2011 0:15:10 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2011 1:12:59 GMT -5
I feel like the ratio of posts to ass shots is way too low
|
|
|
Post by celticjobber on May 13, 2011 3:03:37 GMT -5
Stacy might look better facially and ass-ily, but Velvet has bigger boobs and I certainly wouldn't kick her out of bed.
|
|
|
Post by chaimwitz on May 13, 2011 14:27:03 GMT -5
but stacy hasnt been relevant since.......my god. not in the last 10 years
|
|
|
Post by FUNK_US/BRODUS on May 13, 2011 15:40:32 GMT -5
but stacy hasnt been relevant since.......my god. not in the last 10 years She was in HIMYM last year and definitely still has it. MOTHER OF GOD.
|
|
|
Post by rchi84 on May 14, 2011 0:44:44 GMT -5
Oh Stacy... Sigh!
Anyways, how can any guy complain about Velvet giving us a true reminder of what Impact Wrestling used to be?
|
|
Magnus the Magnificent
King Koopa
didn't want one.
I could write a book about what you don't know!
Posts: 12,536
|
Post by Magnus the Magnificent on May 14, 2011 5:12:25 GMT -5
I never really understood the pointing Velvet does. Is it it "look, look at my ass," which we would anyway if it is/was as spectacular as people say. OR Is it more of an, ahem, invitation... "Enter here"
|
|
|
Post by spongeboobnopants on May 14, 2011 9:22:51 GMT -5
The lack of Velvet Sky pics on this thread is very very very sad
|
|
Celgress
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
The Superior One
Posts: 19,009
|
Post by Celgress on May 14, 2011 9:30:38 GMT -5
but stacy hasnt been relevant since.......my god. not in the last 10 years Which mean she is now eligible to be hired by TNA/Impact Wrestling.
|
|
|
Post by Hit Girl on May 15, 2011 9:29:36 GMT -5
I like watching both of them bend over.
But I prefer Velvet Sky, because she's petite.
|
|
|
Post by chaimwitz on May 15, 2011 9:46:30 GMT -5
but stacy hasnt been relevant since.......my god. not in the last 10 years Which mean she is now eligible to be hired by TNA/Impact Wrestling. exactly! LOL shes seriously bad luck. every tv show she was in went under
|
|
N1SF
AC Slater
Posts: 153
|
Post by N1SF on May 15, 2011 10:19:52 GMT -5
Velvet wins this one.... LET THE PIGEONS LOOSE
|
|
|
Post by jrcz on May 15, 2011 10:29:27 GMT -5
What the f*** is wrong with their faces?
|
|
|
Post by Danimal on May 15, 2011 15:05:09 GMT -5
I never really understood the pointing Velvet does. Is it it "look, look at my ass," which we would anyway if it is/was as spectacular as people say. OR Is it more of an, ahem, invitation... "Enter here" It is a cue to the cameraman to pan to/focus on her butt, makes it extra-slutty.
|
|
|
Post by Wolf Hurricane on May 15, 2011 17:03:36 GMT -5
Velvet's backside has never wowed me like Stacy's did (and still does). Velvet has a regular nice white girl ass. She may not even be in the top 3 of TNA today... Sarita, arguably Angelina and, if she's still there, Taylor Wilde...they all got a more impressive backside than Sky, IMO. Stacy's ass is in the top 2 in all of wrestling history (other one is Trish). Don't forget Miss Tessmacher, So Cal Val and Christy's to a point (she has kinda lost hers over the years). So in all honesty except Madison and Tara, Velvet has like the worst ass in TNA Tara's ass is amazing, I don't know what you're talkin' about. Back on topic: Velvet does have a nice ass, and I definitely wouldn't kick her outta bed. With that said, comparing Velvet to Stacy isn't fair to Velvet. It's a rout; Stacy wins, hands down.
|
|
|
Post by "I'm Batman..." on May 15, 2011 18:19:19 GMT -5
i like the nice lady's butt.
|
|