Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,372
|
Post by Push R Truth on Nov 27, 2012 11:01:00 GMT -5
East Saint Louis!
|
|
AdamAFL was sooooo wrong
Hank Scorpio
note to all: he's a pants-less heathen
I Survived The Impact Spoilers 7/22/15-7/30/15
Posts: 7,164
|
Post by AdamAFL was sooooo wrong on Nov 27, 2012 19:02:55 GMT -5
I don't think they have. It's not their biggest show of the year though. Bound For Glory is. This is more like their Royal Rumble if anything. No Surrender 2008 was in the Toronto area. Damnit, I had a quick scan through all their '08 shows knowing that most were outside the Impact Zone before posting that, must've missed No Surrender.
|
|
@TenaciousBe
Hank Scorpio
Guess who's back... back again
Posts: 5,659
|
Post by @TenaciousBe on Nov 28, 2012 3:49:07 GMT -5
Please be Minneapolis, please be Minneapolis...
|
|
|
Post by Oh Cry Me a Screwball on Nov 28, 2012 8:09:26 GMT -5
I would love for this to be Vegas, but then I remember they have been here before for a Live Impact.
|
|
vivix
ALF
Strike Hard Strike Fast
Posts: 1,077
|
Post by vivix on Nov 28, 2012 13:00:39 GMT -5
Lexington,KY
unfortunately the whole blood issue would arise
|
|
|
Post by Zombie Mod on Nov 28, 2012 13:28:38 GMT -5
Blackburn, lancashire england?
there are a few venues that can hold them.
|
|
Lardlad
El Dandy
Live reaction to @WWE #WWENetwork
Posts: 8,272
|
Post by Lardlad on Nov 29, 2012 21:10:42 GMT -5
San Antonio, TX
Just announced on Impact Wrestling!
|
|
Paco
Hank Scorpio
Posts: 7,145
|
Post by Paco on Nov 29, 2012 21:17:21 GMT -5
MONTH CHANGE too...
Lockdown 2013 will be on March 10th
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Nov 29, 2012 22:03:07 GMT -5
Isn't the Alamodome like 65,000 seats or something? That's setting the bar a bit high.
|
|
|
Post by Been burned too many times on Nov 29, 2012 22:24:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by RareTradU on Nov 29, 2012 23:36:54 GMT -5
Hell ya. That's only a few hours away from me! I went to Slammiversary this year in Dallas and it was awesome so looks like I'll be heading south to see Lockdown next year!
|
|
|
Post by The Legend of Groose on Nov 29, 2012 23:54:49 GMT -5
SIMPLY... THE GREATEST!
|
|
|
Post by Jedi-El of Tomorrow on Nov 30, 2012 0:44:25 GMT -5
Man, I thought it was going to be Moscow.
|
|
Steveweiser
Dalek
Mickie Mickie You're So Fine... Hey Mickie!
THE GRAPS
Posts: 50,249
|
Post by Steveweiser on Nov 30, 2012 8:22:51 GMT -5
Guess Rachel Summerlyn is going off to hand out fliers again...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2012 18:05:53 GMT -5
Okay, I really don't get this.
The wrestling websites are reporting that TNA plans to have less than 12 PPVs in 2013, which means some PPVs are being dropped. Fine. But they're pointing to Lockdown moving from April to March as evidence of this being true. Why? What does a PPV being moved to a different month have to do with holding less PPVs? You accomplish the goal of holding less PPVs by holding less PPVs, not by moving them around the schedule.
|
|
|
Post by Michael Coello on Nov 30, 2012 18:17:58 GMT -5
Okay, I really don't get this. The wrestling websites are reporting that TNA plans to have less than 12 PPVs in 2013, which means some PPVs are being dropped. Fine. But they're pointing to Lockdown moving from April to March as evidence of this being true. Why? What does a PPV being moved to a different month have to do with holding less PPVs? You accomplish the goal of holding less PPVs by holding less PPVs, not by moving them around the schedule. It could be an issue of closing a gap made by removing PPVs. Say TNA gets rid of all the PPVs from after F.R till Lockdown, an April event. That leaves 3 months without a PPV, but if they move it up a month, that gap is shortened by 1, and it's not as big. Then again, that is all an assumption, and I'm pretty sure that's what the sites are doing as well, making assumptions.
|
|
|
Post by Error on Nov 30, 2012 18:28:12 GMT -5
Okay, I really don't get this. The wrestling websites are reporting that TNA plans to have less than 12 PPVs in 2013, which means some PPVs are being dropped. Fine. But they're pointing to Lockdown moving from April to March as evidence of this being true. Why? What does a PPV being moved to a different month have to do with holding less PPVs? You accomplish the goal of holding less PPVs by holding less PPVs, not by moving them around the schedule. Because these sites were stealing stuff from PWInsider without giving the whole story from them: BIG CHANGES COMING TO TNA NEXT YEAR, BACKSTAGE RESPONSE TO IMPACT, MATT MORGAN AND MORE TNA NEWS by Mike Johnson @ 10:46 AM on 11/30/2012 As I wrote last night, the Lockdown PPV being moved up to March 2013 was likely a sign that the company was planning to cut back on their PPV calendar. That is indeed the case. Sources are indicating that the February Against All Odds PPV has been scratched. The company will go from January's Genesis PPV to Lockdown in March. March is usually Victory Road, but that title can always be used for another month. There may be 1-2 other PPVs removed from the calendar as well, but I am not completely sure which shows that may be. Dixie Carter has talked publicly about wanting to cut back on PPVs because there was not a need for running them monthly, but contractual obligations and deciding the right balance of PPVs for the company had been an issue. One would think this could lead to a price increase for the remaining shows, but I haven't heard that either way. ======== Basically, Lockdown is one of the big shows and they want a Wrestlemania style build to it. TNA has long wanted to do this and talked about it so when the PPV gets moved up from its normal slot, you'd figure that'd be why.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2012 18:39:48 GMT -5
Okay, I really don't get this. The wrestling websites are reporting that TNA plans to have less than 12 PPVs in 2013, which means some PPVs are being dropped. Fine. But they're pointing to Lockdown moving from April to March as evidence of this being true. Why? What does a PPV being moved to a different month have to do with holding less PPVs? You accomplish the goal of holding less PPVs by holding less PPVs, not by moving them around the schedule. Basically, Lockdown is one of the big shows and they want a Wrestlemania style build to it. TNA has long wanted to do this and talked about it so when the PPV gets moved up from its normal slot, you'd figure that'd be why. That could have been accomplished without moving Lockdown. Just drop the March PPV instead of the Feb. PPV, and there you go.
|
|
|
Post by Error on Nov 30, 2012 18:53:35 GMT -5
Basically, Lockdown is one of the big shows and they want a Wrestlemania style build to it. TNA has long wanted to do this and talked about it so when the PPV gets moved up from its normal slot, you'd figure that'd be why. That could have been accomplished without moving Lockdown. Just drop the March PPV instead of the Feb. PPV, and there you go. Then Lockdown stays competing with Wrestlemania and TNA isn't stupid enough to try and keep that going.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2012 19:04:25 GMT -5
That could have been accomplished without moving Lockdown. Just drop the March PPV instead of the Feb. PPV, and there you go. Then Lockdown stays competing with Wrestlemania and TNA isn't stupid enough to try and keep that going. WWE could just hold Mania in mid-to-late March. They did it in 2002 (3/17), 2003 (3/30), 2004 (3/14), 2008 (3/30), could have done so in 2009 but didn't, 2010 (3/28), and could do so in 2014. If TNA wants to avoid Mania, they should move it to Feb. or May.
|
|