Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2013 22:19:35 GMT -5
Thanks guys. I also thought that The General didn't really get in good shots so that's why I had that spot with him taking out Flynn for a while. I got sort confused with the character of Coventry because looking at his attributes, he's relatively a short guy and doesn't weigh much but his moves are powerful, more or rather dominate heavyweight manneurves.
I don't know if I'm allowed to say this, but the plan was for me to have a team with Viva but since he's not particularly active it was sort of cancelled with the match he and I had a few shows ago.
|
|
|
Post by General Adam on Feb 28, 2013 22:23:42 GMT -5
Gus, I support you on this and I do believe that a #1 contender match should be done. Ryan, I understand some of your problems also with the character, however.........I dont think anyone really follows the 30 day rule anymore. I need everyone here just to breathe because I would like to keep this place fun and I do not want anyone to be like I was at the end of 2011 when I left. I was in a bad place and I let my emotion get too caught up, which thankfully was relaxed when I quit for a few months as I needed a break to re-focus. Exactly. Come on guys this is for fun. I mean where else are you going to see a man who thinks that he leads an army of monkeys and thinks that bestiality if OK? WWE? No. ROH? No. TNA? Maybe. FAWA? Hell yes.
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Feb 28, 2013 22:28:06 GMT -5
Here's what I think: Hollywood Enigmas have the points. I pointed that out to them about a month ago. Thing is, they didn't formally announce it. Anytime though. Any time...
If they buy their title shot, officially, at last, it will be booked for the next supercard.
And after that, may the Tag Division grow and thrive with more consistent booking.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Socko's Brother on Feb 28, 2013 22:30:21 GMT -5
Both of you are right, Seth & General. This fed is best when there are no OOC conflicts. So I'll try to calm down.
|
|
|
Post by Connor Mackenzie on Feb 28, 2013 22:30:34 GMT -5
Gus, I support you on this and I do believe that a #1 contender match should be done. Ryan, I understand some of your problems also with the character, however.........I dont think anyone really follows the 30 day rule anymore. I need everyone here just to breathe because I would like to keep this place fun and I do not want anyone to be like I was at the end of 2011 when I left. I was in a bad place and I let my emotion get too caught up, which thankfully was relaxed when I quit for a few months as I needed a break to re-focus. Exactly. Come on guys this is for fun. I mean where else are you going to see a man who thinks that he leads an army of monkeys and thinks that bestiality if OK? WWE? No. ROH? No. TNA? Maybe. FAWA? Hell yes. Agreed. I think what might be best is for folks to just take a step back and a few minutes to get a bit of a breather. Let cooler heads prevail. No one wants anyone gone or wants anyone to leave or vacate anything. We should all just look at calming down so we can all get on the same page. Seth and The General bring up very good points. The paramount thing for this whole e-fed is for everyone to have fun. So, smoke 'em if you got 'em. Have a brew if you have a cold one in the fridge and try not to dwell on the fact that The General brought up besitality (though my vote is it would be Joey Ryan who would do it in TNA. Dude's just scary freaky).
|
|
|
Post by General Adam on Feb 28, 2013 22:32:30 GMT -5
Exactly. Come on guys this is for fun. I mean where else are you going to see a man who thinks that he leads an army of monkeys and thinks that bestiality if OK? WWE? No. ROH? No. TNA? Maybe. FAWA? Hell yes. Agreed. I think what might be best is for folks to just take a step back and a few minutes to get a bit of a breather. Let cooler heads prevail. No one wants anyone gone or wants anyone to leave or vacate anything. We should all just look at calming down so we can all get on the same page. Seth and The General bring up very good points. The paramount thing for this whole e-fed is for everyone to have fun. So, smoke 'em if you got 'em. Have a brew if you have a cold one in the fridge and try not to dwell on the fact that The General brought up besitality (though my vote is it would be Joey Ryan who would do it in TNA. Dude's just scary freaky). I knew someone would try to steal my gimmick!
|
|
Gus Richlen Was Wrong
Patti Mayonnaise
Metal Maestro: Co-winner of the FAN Idol Throwdown!
Fun while it lasted
Posts: 38,465
|
Post by Gus Richlen Was Wrong on Feb 28, 2013 22:35:38 GMT -5
Tag titles are vacant. So there'll need o be a math to determine the new champs.
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Feb 28, 2013 22:36:02 GMT -5
Having read the promo thread, it began as a proposal. Gus didn't seem to imply that he was booking anything - just throwing out a challenge to find a No. 1 Contender. From there, I think the language used inadvertently changed that, but I'm not sure Gus intended that per se.
I think we need to mellow out and just brush this under the rug. We can either have a team buy their way to the titles right now or we can wait for after the next supercard to get a #1 Contender determined for Wheel of Misfortune.
This doesn't need to be so dramatic.
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Feb 28, 2013 22:38:33 GMT -5
Also, T&R did successfully defend the belts. I'd rather not vacate them following this incident. That said, I do have an idea... I'll PM Gus and a certain other party in a few minutes...
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Feb 28, 2013 23:05:13 GMT -5
Well, looks like Gus is adamant about vacating the Tag Titles. I'd rather it not happen this way, but... *sigh*
In that case, I'll book us to a new championship following the next supercard.
As for the 30 day rule, my only real issue with that is what if I, the booker, drop the ball? I think that rule died when I had to reduce the show to 2 matches. There's only so much that can be done when a card is that small every week. I don't know if it should be revived even now or later, only because it actually depends less on the member defending and more on me booking.
|
|
|
Post by General Adam on Feb 28, 2013 23:18:24 GMT -5
Well, looks like Gus is adamant about vacating the Tag Titles. I'd rather it not happen this way, but... *sigh* In that case, I'll book us to a new championship following the next supercard. As for the 30 day rule, my only real issue with that is what if I, the booker, drop the ball? I think that rule died when I had to reduce the show to 2 matches. There's only so much that can be done when a card is that small every week. I don't know if it should be revived even now or later, only because it actually depends less on the member defending and more on me booking. How about this then? The champion has to defend their title every other show. Now hear me out. Have the smaller titles like the TV, the Freakin Awesome Title, and maybe the tag titles be on the line and maybe once in awhile have the IF title as well, but heavyweight title should be only defended on PPV's. Just a thought.
|
|
Oak: Certified Jade Hater
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Edgier than Wayne Brady, Harder than Chinese Arithmetic, and Higher than the ratings for Blade: The Series
TOP ROPE CATCH A VIBE YEAH I SWERVE WHEN I DRIVE
Posts: 15,391
|
Post by Oak: Certified Jade Hater on Feb 28, 2013 23:24:35 GMT -5
BRB, did Enigma send you the squash?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 28, 2013 23:32:00 GMT -5
Well, looks like Gus is adamant about vacating the Tag Titles. I'd rather it not happen this way, but... *sigh* In that case, I'll book us to a new championship following the next supercard. As for the 30 day rule, my only real issue with that is what if I, the booker, drop the ball? I think that rule died when I had to reduce the show to 2 matches. There's only so much that can be done when a card is that small every week. I don't know if it should be revived even now or later, only because it actually depends less on the member defending and more on me booking. How about this then? The champion has to defend their title every other show. Now hear me out. Have the smaller titles like the TV, the Freakin Awesome Title, and maybe the tag titles be on the line and maybe once in awhile have the IF title as well, but heavyweight title should be only defended on PPV's. Just a thought. I'd go for this idea.
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Feb 28, 2013 23:38:39 GMT -5
BRB, did Enigma send you the squash? No. I did not receive a squash.
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Feb 28, 2013 23:40:55 GMT -5
Well, looks like Gus is adamant about vacating the Tag Titles. I'd rather it not happen this way, but... *sigh* In that case, I'll book us to a new championship following the next supercard. As for the 30 day rule, my only real issue with that is what if I, the booker, drop the ball? I think that rule died when I had to reduce the show to 2 matches. There's only so much that can be done when a card is that small every week. I don't know if it should be revived even now or later, only because it actually depends less on the member defending and more on me booking. How about this then? The champion has to defend their title every other show. Now hear me out. Have the smaller titles like the TV, the Freakin Awesome Title, and maybe the tag titles be on the line and maybe once in awhile have the IF title as well, but heavyweight title should be only defended on PPV's. Just a thought. I did in fact book like that in the past. Might be high time to revive that too when I expand weekly cards to four matches.
|
|
|
Post by Head Detective Aaron Enigma on Mar 1, 2013 1:08:06 GMT -5
I just re-sent the squash match.
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Mar 1, 2013 1:40:21 GMT -5
Received.
|
|
|
Post by Head Detective Aaron Enigma on Mar 1, 2013 2:59:17 GMT -5
Since the tag team titles are vacated, I am wondering how we should play this off in character. I mean it was quite an abrupt change.
Also, I will refrain from throwing my two cents into this drama. It is best if we just sweep this under the rug, learn from it, and move on. Clearly the issue was just started by a lack of communication and that is easily remedied.
I don't want anybody to quit, I think we still need more people as it is.
|
|
|
Post by Connor Mackenzie on Mar 1, 2013 9:22:23 GMT -5
Hmm...something I just realized. Both Jason and Connor will be pulling double duty this coming Niteraw (against each other no less) with the Inter-Forums tournament final as well as the triple-threat tv title match.
|
|
|
Post by BoilerRoomBrawler on Mar 1, 2013 10:02:06 GMT -5
Yes, I had the idea of postpoNing the TV Title match by a week because of the circumstances. I'll have a tentative card up later, but people may make requests.
|
|