|
Post by Bone Daddy on Jan 21, 2013 14:40:42 GMT -5
I think his argument about how they shot (I haven't watched the video since yesterday) around 160 minutes of footage that aired on television, yet there are only a handful of moments conspirators find fault with is the best thing he's got. Faking 5 minutes is much easier than faking 160. And why fake so much? 10 minutes would have worked as plenty of proof
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Jan 21, 2013 14:51:25 GMT -5
Nobody has appeared to try and tackle the issue that there's no oxygen on the moon or indeed in the whole of space. How did the astronauts breathe?
|
|
mizerable
Fry's dog Seymour
You're the lowest on the totem pole here, Alva. The lowest.
Posts: 23,475
|
Post by mizerable on Jan 21, 2013 15:00:01 GMT -5
Have you seen the BBC documentary? It's a lot longer and more detailed than this 13 minute video, if anything the burden would be on this guy to take their evidence point by point which he doesn't even attempt to do here, much less did he rip anybody to shreds or whatever. I don't even think the moon landing was a hoax, if Mythbusters doesn't think so I can't really f*** with those guys I'm not even really a science person, but I also think this video is stupid. The whole thing is like "Well, to fake the moon landing they would have had to do blah blah blah with film which couldn't have been done back then". The whole time I'm like "ok...they would have had to be able to do that to shoot this crappy, blurry footage where you can barely see anything...why?" And he never really gets there, unless like I said it's in the last 30 seconds because after a while I got tired of waiting for him to hit me with the big "gotcha" moment. It never came. Now that I think about it, I disagree with his whole premise in the first place. The fact that film was crappy back then means that it was gonna look like s*** no matter what, which it did. Wouldn't that make it easier to fake, not harder? He said himself that it was a blurry, boring mess and he couldn't even bring himself to watch most of it. He's like "why has no one touched on this, the most obvious and important point?" Because that's not what this is, sorry dude. You are going in circles over nothing. There are probably hundreds of theories that have been proposed over a fake moon landing. To address them all would be absolutely pointless because no one is going to remain convinced. Hell, he makes it pretty clear at the ending of the video that some people prefer proposed theories that would rely on secret technology, exploitation and payoffs to large numbers of people to keep quiet. Again, we're just going to go round and round. It's not the "blurry" imagery that he was explaining. It was the speed settings that weren't available at the time. You could film at a fast rate then slow it down to match the gravitational method by 1/6. However, much like he said, to do this you could only do it for roughly 30 seconds. Since the moon landing that people watched over 40 years ago takes place over the course of almost 2 hours...that's a lot of work and a lot of film reels to go through. Again, he's stressing the knowledge he has of cameras and the carnal theory of just slowing down the frame rate. He's absolutely right in that regard. Believe what you want to believe, but he backed his theory with facts, you're backing yours with "yeah well the footage is crappy and such"...that's completely besides the point.
|
|
The OP
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
changed his name
Posts: 15,785
|
Post by The OP on Jan 21, 2013 15:08:38 GMT -5
He stated facts (and frankly I'm being generous by assuming they're facts I have no idea who this guy is or what his actual credentials are, but let's say he's the world's leading expert) but he doesn't connect them to any specific pieces of footage or really explain the relevance. At best he did a poor job explaining.
|
|
Push R Truth
Patti Mayonnaise
Unique and Special Snowflake, and a pants-less heathen.
Perpetually Constipated
Posts: 39,372
|
Post by Push R Truth on Jan 21, 2013 15:31:29 GMT -5
I own a phone that I can watch millions of hours of porno on and people are still claiming we didn't have the technology to make it to the moon? !!?!?!?!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2013 15:42:12 GMT -5
Not for nothin' but I mean - fake moon landing, real moon landing. Does it really matter? We should be talking about whether or not the Mars landing was faked at this point. Or where da heck is my moon cheese!?!?
|
|
The OP
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
changed his name
Posts: 15,785
|
Post by The OP on Jan 21, 2013 16:06:43 GMT -5
That's kind of how I feel, and like why I felt so underwhelmed by this guy's spiel. This dude just bugs me, I don't know*. I wants me some cheese.
*the guy in the video, not mizerable or bone daddy those guys are cool
|
|