|
|
Post by wwefan71080 on Jan 24, 2013 14:09:02 GMT -5
I would say CM Punk because remember the Undertaker in say 2002 saying something "you will respect me or I'll make you famous", bringing something that resembles that to this feud for the streak
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2013 14:12:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lemonyellowson on Jan 24, 2013 14:14:21 GMT -5
i really hope its v punk in a streak vs title streak match.
on the subject of mania, if they don't do rock v brock they are crazy
|
|
Wieners=$$$
Hank Scorpio
Gif Master Extraordinaire
I Miss You Peanut😥
Posts: 6,437
|
Post by Wieners=$$$ on Jan 24, 2013 14:16:50 GMT -5
I would pay all the monies to see Undertaker punch Fred Durst in the face for ten minutes while he tries to sing "Rollin'." |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2013 14:25:32 GMT -5
I would pay all the monies to see Undertaker punch Fred Durst in the face for ten minutes while he tries to sing "Rollin'." That could be the selling point of mania 29. Even caption it that. "Wrestlemania 29: Undertaker punches Fred Durst in the face repeatedly". 1.5 million buys minimum. |
|
|
|
Post by frogsplash45 on Jan 24, 2013 15:05:32 GMT -5
My "sort of realistic but not really" card: Punk vs Taker (WWE Title???) Rock vs Brock (WWE Title???) Cena vs Ryback Falls Count Anywhere Championship Scramble - Del Rio vs Big Show vs Sheamus vs Ziggler vs The Miz vs Mark Henry (World Heavy Title) Hardcore Match - Dean Ambrose [w/ Shield] vs Randy Orton [w/ Mick Foley] Team Hell No vs Rhodes Scholars vs Prime Time Players vs Team Air Boom (Tag Titles) Antonio Cesaro vs Rey Mysterio (US Title) Wade Barrett vs Ricky Steamboat (IC title) No Disqualification - Kaitlyn vs AJ (Diva's Title) Damn... I'm sitting here trying to figure out a way to include 3MB.  I guess they can do a bit with the musical guest... but I'm hoping there isn't one.  |
|
543Y2J
Patti Mayonnaise
Seventh level .gif Master
Posts: 38,794
|
Post by 543Y2J on Jan 24, 2013 15:14:00 GMT -5
My "sort of realistic but not really" card: Punk vs Taker (WWE Title???) Rock vs Brock (WWE Title???) Cena vs Ryback Falls Count Anywhere Championship Scramble - Del Rio vs Big Show vs Sheamus vs Ziggler vs The Miz vs Mark Henry (World Heavy Title) Hardcore Match - Dean Ambrose [w/ Shield] vs Randy Orton [w/ Mick Foley] Team Hell No vs Rhodes Scholars vs Prime Time Players vs Team Air Boom (Tag Titles) Antonio Cesaro vs Rey Mysterio (US Title) Wade Barrett vs Ricky Steamboat (IC title) No Disqualification - Kaitlyn vs AJ (Diva's Title) Damn... I'm sitting here trying to figure out a way to include 3MB. I guess they can do a bit with the musical guest... but I'm hoping there isn't one. I really like this card, well done |
|
|
|
Post by frogsplash45 on Jan 24, 2013 16:12:31 GMT -5
My "sort of realistic but not really" card: Punk vs Taker (WWE Title???) Rock vs Brock (WWE Title???) Cena vs Ryback Falls Count Anywhere Championship Scramble - Del Rio vs Big Show vs Sheamus vs Ziggler vs The Miz vs Mark Henry (World Heavy Title) Hardcore Match - Dean Ambrose [w/ Shield] vs Randy Orton [w/ Mick Foley] Team Hell No vs Rhodes Scholars vs Prime Time Players vs Team Air Boom (Tag Titles) Antonio Cesaro vs Rey Mysterio (US Title) Wade Barrett vs Ricky Steamboat (IC title) No Disqualification - Kaitlyn vs AJ (Diva's Title) Damn... I'm sitting here trying to figure out a way to include 3MB. I guess they can do a bit with the musical guest... but I'm hoping there isn't one. I really like this card, well done Thanks. Injuries and Returns could throw it off though. Sin Cara, Christian, Swagger, etc... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2013 16:14:36 GMT -5
Still wondering why they seem to be shy on Cena vs Taker.
Seems like Cena vs Taker and Rock vs x is a better draw than Cena vs Rock 2.
Course it's early enough they can do a mini swerve and still do it.
|
|
|
|
Post by crowwreak was WRONG on Jan 24, 2013 16:21:17 GMT -5
Still wondering why they seem to be shy on Cena vs Taker. Seems like Cena vs Taker and Rock vs x is a better draw than Cena vs Rock 2. Course it's early enough they can do a mini swerve and still do it. because they'd lose one of them's status as boring invincible hero. Taker should only do that match if it's his last (which frankly the HHH match should be) |
|
|
|
Post by sportatorium on Jan 24, 2013 16:30:10 GMT -5
Still wondering why they seem to be shy on Cena vs Taker. Seems like Cena vs Taker and Rock vs x is a better draw than Cena vs Rock 2. Course it's early enough they can do a mini swerve and still do it. I think they are shy because they have no idea how to book it. I don't think anyone would cheer Cena and his act of fawning/pandering over getting to wrestle Taker would make no sense. His character isn't selfish enough to want to break the Streak, nor would anyone really want to/buy into Taker going heel on Cena. I think we're getting Taker/Punk and Rock/Cena. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2013 16:43:49 GMT -5
Still wondering why they seem to be shy on Cena vs Taker. Seems like Cena vs Taker and Rock vs x is a better draw than Cena vs Rock 2. Course it's early enough they can do a mini swerve and still do it. I think they are shy because they have no idea how to book it. I don't think anyone would cheer Cena and his act of fawning/pandering over getting to wrestle Taker would make no sense. His character isn't selfish enough to want to break the Streak, nor would anyone really want to/buy into Taker going heel on Cena. I think we're getting Taker/Punk and Rock/Cena. That's not really an issue with Cena though. I think he works his best in the face/face stuff and if it's 90% taker 10% cena that's just fine. We've seen a few times over recent years and Cena seems to do well playing heel for the match without actually turning. As for how to get it started, I think the easiest way would be for Taker to be a surprise entrant in the rumble. Let Cena go ahead and eliminate Taker. They can do a respect feud and it'll be sufficient. Cena won't lose anything in the process. He can do some minor heel stuff vs Taker, Taker can be the face, and they can have a good match at mania with the appropriate teasers. Then then shake hands after Taker helps Cena to his feet or whatever. It doesn't really take much build for it to be a PPV match honestly. There's many routes to take that are just fine for Cena to stay a face afterwards. Make it an "I quit" match, as I and many others have suggested. Cena/Taker as an I Quit match is quite simply the strongest match they have available. Cena doesn't even have to pass out in the Hell's Gate as the result without saying it. Cena can have a good match, straight up say "I quit" then be on the next show being remorseful about it, put over Taker's toughness at mania, and it won't hurt him a bit. |
|
Eunös ✈
Dalek
Duck Feet Expert
Tolerated, just not practically liked.
Posts: 59,301
|
Post by Eunös ✈ on Jan 24, 2013 16:48:20 GMT -5
Been saying it for years now but for me "Taker vs Cena" is a must for Wrestlemania.
If not this year than it should definatly be at Wrestlemania 30.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2013 0:28:42 GMT -5
It's pretty much Brock or Cena or bust to me. Don't want to see Punk in a match in which we already know the outcome, plus I don't think it would be any good. Brock vs. Taker would be a one-of-a-kind match, and Taker/Cena is one of the only fresh matches left for Cena.
|
|
chazraps
Wade Wilson
Better have my money when I come-a collect!
Posts: 28,269 
|
Post by chazraps on Jan 25, 2013 0:40:15 GMT -5
Been saying it for years now but for me "Taker vs Cena" is a must for Wrestlemania. If not this year than it should definatly be at Wrestlemania 30. Since 2008, I've always thought it would be THE match and THE ONLY MATCH that could headline Wrestlemania 30. After Wrestlemania 20 and 25 were such busts, I think Vince & Co. would want to make a landmark show really feel next level, and Cena-Undertaker (being at least one of their final matches) would be the only way you could do that. |
|
|
|
Post by sportatorium on Jan 25, 2013 0:40:40 GMT -5
I think they are shy because they have no idea how to book it. I don't think anyone would cheer Cena and his act of fawning/pandering over getting to wrestle Taker would make no sense. His character isn't selfish enough to want to break the Streak, nor would anyone really want to/buy into Taker going heel on Cena. I think we're getting Taker/Punk and Rock/Cena. That's not really an issue with Cena though. I think he works his best in the face/face stuff and if it's 90% taker 10% cena that's just fine. We've seen a few times over recent years and Cena seems to do well playing heel for the match without actually turning. As for how to get it started, I think the easiest way would be for Taker to be a surprise entrant in the rumble. Let Cena go ahead and eliminate Taker. They can do a respect feud and it'll be sufficient. Cena won't lose anything in the process. He can do some minor heel stuff vs Taker, Taker can be the face, and they can have a good match at mania with the appropriate teasers. Then then shake hands after Taker helps Cena to his feet or whatever. It doesn't really take much build for it to be a PPV match honestly. There's many routes to take that are just fine for Cena to stay a face afterwards. Make it an "I quit" match, as I and many others have suggested. Cena/Taker as an I Quit match is quite simply the strongest match they have available. Cena doesn't even have to pass out in the Hell's Gate as the result without saying it. Cena can have a good match, straight up say "I quit" then be on the next show being remorseful about it, put over Taker's toughness at mania, and it won't hurt him a bit. I'd agree with all of this if Cena really would go out & take the feud seriously & make a compelling case why he deserves the respect more than Taker. Even short term heel behavior a/la Shawn vs Hogan with a quick change back if they have to keep him babyface. |
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 25, 2013 0:42:53 GMT -5
I voted Punk, but I'd prefer Lesnar as part of this card:
Triple Threat Match for the WWE Championship
The Rock (c) v John Cena (Royal Rumble Winner) v CM Punk (contracted rematch from losing title at Royal Rumble)
Last Man Standing Match
The Undertaker v Brock Lesnar
World Heavyweight Championship Match
Dolph Ziggler (with Big E Langston in his corner) (c) v Daniel Bryan (with Kane in his corner)
Randy Orton v Sheamus
Big Show v Ryback
Elimination Tag Match
Alberto Del Rio, Rey Mysterio and Sin Cara v The Shield (Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins and Roman Reigns)
8-Man Money In The Bank Ladder Match*
Kofi Kingston v The Miz v Justin Gabriel v R-Truth v Antonio Cesaro v Cody Rhodes v Damien Sandow v Heath Slater
*(If Christian and Mark Henry are back from injury before WrestleMania, this becomes a 10-Man MITB Ladder Match)
Intercontinental Championship Match
Wade Barrett (c) v Battle Royal Winner
Gauntlet Match for the WWE Tag Team Championship
The Prime Time Players (Titus O'Neil and Darren Young) (c) v The Usos (Jimmy Uso and Jey Uso) v Primo & Epico v The Major Broskis (Zack Ryder and Curt Hawkins) v 3MB (Drew McIntyre and Jinder Mahal) v Mystery Team (The New Age Outlaws (Road Dogg and Billy Gunn))
Divas Championship Match
Kaitlyn (c) v AJ Lee
YouTube Battle Royal for an Intercontinental Championship Match*
Alex Riley v Brad Maddox v Brodus Clay v Camacho v David Otunga v Derrick Bateman v Fandango v The Great Khali v Hornswoggle v Hunico v JTG v Mason Ryan v Michael McGillicutty v Percy Watson v Ricardo Rodriguez v Ted DiBiase Jr v Tensai v William Regal v Yoshi Tatsu
*(If Evan Bourne, Ezekiel Jackson, Jack Swagger and Santino Marella are back from injury/hiatus before WrestleMania, they go in this match)
|
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 11,001
|
Post by Sparkybob on Jan 25, 2013 0:51:16 GMT -5
Correct me if I am wrong but I am pretty sure rematch clause have a 30 day limit or so. So I don't that is how punk gets into the title match. You can have punk lose the title to Rock at the chamber to possibly set up the triple threat match for mania.
|
|
|
|
Post by EoE: Well There's Your Problem on Jan 25, 2013 0:56:15 GMT -5
Correct me if I am wrong but I am pretty sure rematch clause have a 30 day limit or so. So I don't that is how punk gets into the title match. You can have punk lose the title to Rock at the chamber to possibly set up the triple threat match for mania. Yeah, I know... I'd have it be part of some kind of contract shenanigans where he enacts a rematch clause that makes it legally binding that his rematch is at WrestleMania. You know, for dat heel heatz. |
|
Sparkybob
King Koopa
I have a status?
Posts: 11,001
|
Post by Sparkybob on Jan 25, 2013 0:59:44 GMT -5
Correct me if I am wrong but I am pretty sure rematch clause have a 30 day limit or so. So I don't that is how punk gets into the title match. You can have punk lose the title to Rock at the chamber to possibly set up the triple threat match for mania. Yeah, I know... I'd have it be part of some kind of contract shenanigans where he enacts a rematch clause that makes it legally binding that his rematch is at WrestleMania. You know, for dat heel heatz. I see well that could work, thought I wonder what he will do for the chamber ppv. Also missing from your card is the match where triple H buries somebody in order to prove he still got it |
|
