The QC Loser
Hank Scorpio
Come on follow my Twitter I'm cool!
Posts: 6,241
|
Post by The QC Loser on Mar 31, 2013 11:00:29 GMT -5
I'd have to go with either Dark Knight Rises or Hancock. I think Dark Knight is mainly because I loved the first two and the third just left me with a "That's It?" feeling. Hancock though seemed like such a cool concept and I really was wanting to see it. I did and couldn't wait for it to end and was just like wow I'll never watch this again.
|
|
|
Post by g1megatronfan on Mar 31, 2013 11:56:39 GMT -5
Spiderman 3.
I liked the first two so when I went to see the third one I was excited...that died about 30 mins into it. That movie was such a drag. I normally give movies I didn't like in theatres a 2nd chance when they come to dvd/blu-ray but not this one.
The one and only time I've seen it is when it came out. I can't bring myself to sit though it again.
|
|
Bub (BLM)
Patti Mayonnaise
advocates duck on rodent violence
Fed. Up.
Posts: 37,742
|
Post by Bub (BLM) on Mar 31, 2013 11:57:28 GMT -5
Green Lantern. I was never on board with Ryan Reynolds, but I was willing to give it a shot anyway because I think the modern age Green Lantern comic books are some of the best comics I've ever read. Then the trailer came out, and the movie looked great. It was cut in a way that made the space setting and Oa look like they'd be the large portion of the film, and then what happens? Most of the GL movie takes place on Earth. If I want to see a superhero movie set on Earth, I'll watch every other superhero movie ever. GL should have been the DC Comics version of Star Trek.
|
|
|
Post by mysterydriver on Mar 31, 2013 21:51:31 GMT -5
The Green Hornet horribly disappointed me. Seth Rogan seems a funny guy but the comedy was flat. Cameron Diaz still has charisma but the love interest plot was nonexistent to the point that when she re-entered the film I was going "Oh, that's right." Jay Chou seems an action guy but the action was dull.
The jokes didn't work. The action didn't work. The combination of the both was a pure mess. The only 'good' good part was the main villain's introduction before his part-comedy, part-serious evil arc became just as ridiculous and poor as the rest of the film.
Plus...two freaking hours? Dear goodness. Just...dear goodness.
|
|
|
Post by A Platypus Rave on Apr 1, 2013 1:38:03 GMT -5
Green Lantern. I was never on board with Ryan Reynolds, but I was willing to give it a shot anyway because I think the modern age Green Lantern comic books are some of the best comics I've ever read. Then the trailer came out, and the movie looked great. It was cut in a way that made the space setting and Oa look like they'd be the large portion of the film, and then what happens? Most of the GL movie takes place on Earth. If I want to see a superhero movie set on Earth, I'll watch every other superhero movie ever. GL should have been the DC Comics version of Star Trek. I was fine with most of the movie being on earth, it was the origin story after all. My biggest problem with gl is they tried to jam everything into one movie. So nothing got anywhere near enough time to have any weight to it.
|
|
Welfare Willis
Crow T. Robot
Pornomancer 555-BONE FDIC Bonsured
Game Center CX Kacho on!
Posts: 44,259
|
Post by Welfare Willis on Apr 1, 2013 2:36:41 GMT -5
Green Lantern. I was never on board with Ryan Reynolds, but I was willing to give it a shot anyway because I think the modern age Green Lantern comic books are some of the best comics I've ever read. Then the trailer came out, and the movie looked great. It was cut in a way that made the space setting and Oa look like they'd be the large portion of the film, and then what happens? Most of the GL movie takes place on Earth. If I want to see a superhero movie set on Earth, I'll watch every other superhero movie ever. GL should have been the DC Comics version of Star Trek. I was fine with most of the movie being on earth, it was the origin story after all. My biggest problem with gl is they tried to jam everything into one movie. So nothing got anywhere near enough time to have any weight to it. I'm kinda worried the new X-Men movie will be similar to that. Too many cameos and not enough focus on the story.
|
|
|
Post by Danimal on Apr 1, 2013 4:23:53 GMT -5
Green Lantern. I was never on board with Ryan Reynolds, but I was willing to give it a shot anyway because I think the modern age Green Lantern comic books are some of the best comics I've ever read. Then the trailer came out, and the movie looked great. It was cut in a way that made the space setting and Oa look like they'd be the large portion of the film, and then what happens? Most of the GL movie takes place on Earth. If I want to see a superhero movie set on Earth, I'll watch every other superhero movie ever. GL should have been the DC Comics version of Star Trek. I was fine with most of the movie being on earth, it was the origin story after all. My biggest problem with gl is they tried to jam everything into one movie. So nothing got anywhere near enough time to have any weight to it. I thought Green Lantern was alright but ya they tried to do too much. They should've made it with idea of a trilogy. Hector Hammond should've been the primary villain with an expanded origin story. Parallax should've been the villain for the sequel. Then have Sinestro for the third flick.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2013 8:01:07 GMT -5
I was going to vote for Spider-Man 3 before someone mentioned the Green Hornet.
Green Hornet gets my vote.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2013 9:27:58 GMT -5
Tie between Thor & Captain America.
I never expect sequels to be good so when Iron Man 2 or Spider Man 3 fell off, it wasn't anything big, but both Thor and Cap America were just so blech. They felt like sequels of much better films.
|
|
StuntGranny®
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Not Actually a Granny
Posts: 16,099
|
Post by StuntGranny® on Apr 1, 2013 9:37:22 GMT -5
This was a tough choice for me. I almost went with "other" because I thought Captain America and Thor were pretty bad/disappointing. I was also disappointed with The Dark Knight Rises, but not on the same level as Spider-Man 3. So yeah, I went with Spider-Man 3.
|
|
The OP
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
changed his name
Posts: 15,785
|
Post by The OP on Apr 1, 2013 9:42:15 GMT -5
The Green Hornet horribly disappointed me. Seth Rogan seems a funny guy but the comedy was flat. Cameron Diaz still has charisma but the love interest plot was nonexistent to the point that when she re-entered the film I was going "Oh, that's right." Jay Chou seems an action guy but the action was dull. The jokes didn't work. The action didn't work. The combination of the both was a pure mess. The only 'good' good part was the main villain's introduction before his part-comedy, part-serious evil arc became just as ridiculous and poor as the rest of the film. Plus...two freaking hours? Dear goodness. Just...dear goodness. This was just a strange and probably misguided idea for a film adaption in the first place. I didn't even think of this one, though it was a huge disappointment, because I almost don't even think of it as a "real" Green Hornet movie. They should have called it "Son of the Green Hornet" and made it an all-out comedy or just done one that was faithful to the source material. I thought it could have been good if they made a movie set during WWII, like Disney did with The Rocketeer.
|
|