How would rate SummerSlam?

[RI Richmark]

Just a quick glance at the board and I see the results have everyone talking but how would rate SummerSlam overall? I would give it 4 Stars myself. The undercard was kinda "meh" but Christian/Del Rio, Punk/Lesnar & Bryan/Cena really delivered. Punk/Lesnar could be MOTY and the ending to the WWE title match will be talked about for a long time. So what's your opinion?

[MGH]

Strong 5.

No bad matches, one hell of a main event, and the MOTY to this point smack in the middle of the show.

[Krazee]

f***ing fantastic, 5 stars

[Deleted]

5, whole show was dead on. Christian and Del Rio had a fantastic match to carry the undercard, which was bolstered by defined rivalries and gimmicks, and both main events were spectacular. WWE is in fine form at the moment, that felt like a 1998 PPV with better wrestling.

[The Masked Heel WAS WRONG]

+5 million stars

[thegame415]

I gave it 5. Cena/Bryan and Punk/Lesnar are match of the year candidates. I have to watch them again before I determine if I liked them more than Cena/Punk from 2/25 Raw.

[FinalGwen]

Gave it 4. Almost every match was strong-excellent. The sour taste of the finale is the only reason I'm not giving it 5.

[DIIV]

Easily 5. As much as I didn't like the ending, I did NOT see that pedigree coming, that was awesome. This is going to be a great feud.

[BigWill]

I gave it a 4. The midcard matches were lacking, which prevented it from being a 5.

[Ecks Ecks Ringout Ecks Ecks]

If we're going with whole numbers, I give it a 5. Three great matches, some good matches and one underwhelming-but-not-really-awful match. I can't even remember the last time a Del Rio match made it into my top three.

If I'm allowed to nitpick, I'd give it a 4.7 or thereabouts.

[rybackrulez]

Aug 19, 2013 0:44:14 GMT -5 MGH said:

Strong 5.

No bad matches, one hell of a main event, and the MOTY to this point smack in the middle of the show.

This i have live bias though

That was such a rocking crowd

So many haters of la, but tonight was a damn good crowd

Cena was so hated

[celticjobber]

I'd give it a 4/5. Two great matches (with Cena/Bryan being a legit WWE MOTY candidate), but almost everything else ranged from a worst match of the year candidate (Kane/Bray) to mediocre.

ADR/Christian was probably okay, but I zoned out because both of them bore me (especially Christian).

[Bub (BLM)]

I'd give it a solid 4. Punk/Lesnar and Bryan/Cena were phenomenal, but the rest of the show was highly forgettable. Not bad, just forgettable.

[wallabylikeyou]

I'd give it a 4. Bryan/Cena and Punk/Lesnar were great, Christian/Del Rio was good, RVD v Ambrose was good but I'm a bit bored with DQ finishes with The Shield, Cody/Sandow was good but too short, the mixed tag didn't do much for me and Kane/Bray and Natalya/Brie weren't good at all.

[Chip]

3. Nothing about it was especially bad, just the entire MITB concept ruined what could have been a very enjoyable match for me. Any time there is a MITB briefcase in existence I just straight up can't get invested in any title match.

[grunt]

3. Aside from the great Brock/Punk, and the okay Cena/Bryan (dragged down by some pacing issues, a few weird booking decisions, and the obvious überpredictable post-match overbooking) everything else was forgettable.

[mizerable]

I came in with the intention of giving it an 8 out of 10. So I guess 4 stars. It was hindered by the inferno match, the stupid diva match and ending the night on a bad note IMO. Oh and also not counting the pin on Del Rio...that pissed me off.

[Deleted]

A strong 4.

The undercard could have been better, but the three main events were excellent.

[________ has left the building]

I got to go with 4 stars. The main event matches over delivered. Del Rio/ Christian and Rhodes/Sandow were really good. Everything else felt like filler. The main events by themselves: 5+ stars. All together: 4.

[comahan]

Fantastic show. Solid 5!