Mochi Lone Wolf
Fry's dog Seymour
Development through Destruction.
Posts: 24,153 
|
Post by Mochi Lone Wolf on Sept 27, 2013 13:11:26 GMT -5
So, exactly how did this waste of resources get into these events without someone noticing he had this shirt?
Did he wear a different shirt and then once he got into the arena, he changed it?
|
|
|
|
Post by BayleyTiffyCodyCenaJudyHopps on Sept 27, 2013 14:17:43 GMT -5
True, but you also don't see a lot of people claiming Berry Gordy was really behind Lana Clarkson's murder. He was, however, responsible for Rockwell.  On the plus side, though...The Last Dragon. Thanks Berry Gordy. He sweet talked a reluctant MJ into doing Motown 25. That totally cancels out Rockwell. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2013 16:32:46 GMT -5
Works for all the kids who count Che Guevara among their heroes. What about the assholes that have Charles Manson on their shirts glorifying him? They are the bigger assholes than the Che Guevara guys. Remind me of the time, C.M. Punk wore a Charles Manson shirt on Raw.  |
|
|
|
Post by "American Cream" Dusty Loads on Sept 27, 2013 18:02:21 GMT -5
Do people even still wear Che Guevara shirts?
|
|
|
|
Post by ThereIsNoAbsurdistOnlyZuul on Sept 27, 2013 21:33:13 GMT -5
Yeah that's not even close to being the same thing. Why not? Che was a murderer, plain and simple. No movie, no image, no diary can change that fact. Most of the younger people who wear the shirt or have a poster bearing his image do not know that or, if they do, justify it in some way. This guy is doing it for attention but those kids are just misguided. So let me start by saying that I agree that people who wear a t-shirt, or a slogan of something and do not understand the context or history of it are ignorant, maybe willfully stupid. However, I think the general thrust of the contention is: Pro-wrestler who kills family and himself is not equitable to a guerrilla soldier/leader. For one thing if you look at the crimes in the most clinical they did then Che is the 'bigger monster,' in terms of greater impact to the world, and other human beings. But then, we enter the murky ground of where justification of ones actions is a subjective thing, and starts to blur a lot of the arguments (politics notwithstanding), but there are some things to understand here, and further illustrate why one shouldn't draw this kind of parallel: *We know, objectively as the man had spoken at great length about it, that Che believed in the need for, and the righteousness of, his actions. *We cannot know, objectively, how Benoit felt about his actions in his twilight hours. Plus comparing someone who happens to wear a Che shirt out in public in a First World country, to someone wearing a Chris Benoit t-shirt to a televised wrestling event does not work. |
|
