|
Post by Non Banjoble Tokens on Dec 18, 2013 20:20:45 GMT -5
As much as I enjoy the B2K reference (Bump Bump Bump was the go-to jam for Middle School dances), we just went hardcore into strawman territory. Coincidentally, this man has no opinion on the subject: But I always have to hear what shredded-wheat-face-man's opinion on everything is before I take my own stance.
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Dec 18, 2013 20:21:04 GMT -5
Although to be fair, if people open their ignorant yaps more in this kind of fashion it might actually do them some good to think about why exactly they've been subjected to the reaction they get
|
|
kidglov3s
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants her Shot
Who is Tiger Maskooo?
Posts: 15,870
|
Post by kidglov3s on Dec 18, 2013 20:21:47 GMT -5
We all know that B2K ended when their movie came out, there's just one question?
Who Got Served?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2013 20:22:41 GMT -5
As much as I enjoy the B2K reference (Bump Bump Bump was the go-to jam for Middle School dances), we just went hardcore into strawman territory. Coincidentally, this man has no opinion on the subject: But I always have to hear what shredded-wheat-face-man's opinion on everything is before I take my own stance. He's waiting for more facts to come out on the matter. He's nothing if not cautious.
|
|
chazraps
Wade Wilson
Better have my money when I come-a collect!
Posts: 27,938
|
Post by chazraps on Dec 18, 2013 20:22:43 GMT -5
As much as I enjoy the B2K reference (Bump Bump Bump was the go-to jam for Middle School dances), we just went hardcore into strawman territory. Coincidentally, this man has no opinion on the subject: Sorry, I saw a chance for a B2K reference and I took it. Yes, it probably was hyperbolic and an extreme, but have you seen the way Diddy looks at his flip-phone in the video? I didn't really have a choice. Thanks God I live in a country where I have the freedom to make B2K references. I think we can all agree if the Duck Dynasty gang had a little more B2K in their lives, they wouldn't have such awful opinions.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 18, 2013 20:23:27 GMT -5
I certainly don't agree with anything he said but I think forcing him off TV is ridiculous.
Should we screen every TV star, actor or reality star to make sure they believe A, B and C before they are allowed to be on TV? Or if they don't believe A, B and C then put in their contract that they cannot reveal that they don't believe A, B and C?
|
|
|
Post by RedSmile on Dec 18, 2013 20:24:03 GMT -5
Does it really matter what a guy from Duck Dynasty said? One way or the other???
It's a f***ing low brow reality show. It doesn't matter. It has zero weight in anything remotely important.
|
|
kidglov3s
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants her Shot
Who is Tiger Maskooo?
Posts: 15,870
|
Post by kidglov3s on Dec 18, 2013 20:24:09 GMT -5
As much as I enjoy the B2K reference (Bump Bump Bump was the go-to jam for Middle School dances), we just went hardcore into strawman territory. Coincidentally, this man has no opinion on the subject: Sorry, I saw a chance for a B2K reference and I took it. Yes, it probably was hyperbolic and an extreme, but have you seen the way Diddy looks at his flip-phone in the video? I didn't really have a choice. Thanks God I live in a country where I have the freedom to make B2K references. I think we can all agree if the Duck Dynasty gang had a little more B2K in their lives, they wouldn't have such awful opinions. If Duck Dynasty were to follow in the example of B2K, would they serve all people, or only the right kind of people?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2013 20:25:49 GMT -5
As much as I enjoy the B2K reference (Bump Bump Bump was the go-to jam for Middle School dances), we just went hardcore into strawman territory. Coincidentally, this man has no opinion on the subject: Sorry, I saw a chance for a B2K reference and I took it. Yes, it probably was hyperbolic and an extreme, but have you seen the way Diddy looks at his flip-phone in the video? I didn't really have a choice. Thanks God I live in a country where I have the freedom to make B2K references. I think we can all agree if the Duck Dynasty gang had a little more B2K in their lives, they wouldn't have such awful opinions.The same could be said of all of us. I'd expect AJ Lee arguments to go down by 80% at least if everyone would just take the time to listen to B2K before posting.
|
|
|
Post by Magic knows Black Lives Matter on Dec 18, 2013 20:25:51 GMT -5
Does it really matter what a guy from Duck Dynasty said? One way or the other??? It's a f***ing low brow reality show. It doesn't matter. It has zero weight in anything remotely important. Yeah, I do care honestly. It doesn't matter if it's a millionaire or someone that's dirt poor with no influence, an asshole is an asshole and deserves to be called so.
|
|
chazraps
Wade Wilson
Better have my money when I come-a collect!
Posts: 27,938
|
Post by chazraps on Dec 18, 2013 20:26:48 GMT -5
I certainly don't agree with anything he said but I think forcing him off TV is ridiculous. Should we screen every TV star, actor or reality star to make sure they believe A, B and C before they are allowed to be on TV? Or if they don't believe A, B and C then put in their contract that they cannot reveal that they don't believe A, B and C? Thread's not about that, it's about popping off at the mouth and spreading wilding ignorant, inaccurate hurtful statements to the media. If you can't get forced off TV for that, what can you get forced off for? I shudder to think about what he would say about B2K.
|
|
|
Post by DrBackflipsHoffman on Dec 18, 2013 20:27:25 GMT -5
Does it really matter what a guy from Duck Dynasty said? One way or the other??? It's a f***ing low brow reality show. It doesn't matter. It has zero weight in anything remotely important. Homophobia is still as common as sunrise, so yes.
|
|
|
Post by HMARK Center on Dec 18, 2013 20:28:09 GMT -5
Imagine that, People on here wanting to take away Freedom of speech. No matter how Replusive I Find his opinions, He is entitled to freedom of speech. I'm sorry, I must've missed the part where people argued that the federal government should intervene to lock him away for stating what he thought. Don't bring up the First Amendment if you don't know what it contains, please.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2013 20:29:06 GMT -5
How in the heck is this thread still going on? Feels very much like an eventual powder keg-type thread
|
|
BRV
Bill S. Preston, Esq.
Wants him some Taco Flavored Kisses.
Posts: 16,869
|
Post by BRV on Dec 18, 2013 20:29:34 GMT -5
I certainly don't agree with anything he said but I think forcing him off TV is ridiculous. Should we screen every TV star, actor or reality star to make sure they believe A, B and C before they are allowed to be on TV? Or if they don't believe A, B and C then put in their contract that they cannot reveal that they don't believe A, B and C? People are allowed to have their own set of beliefs and opinions, but when you say something intentionally hurtful and offensive that denigrates a group of people, you should understand that there are consequences. Comparing homosexuality to beastiality and terrorism, for example. Or equating black people to trash, albeit "white" trash, is another. Look at it this way: if any of us said those things publicly at our jobs, would we honestly expect to walk back into work the next day and not face any sort of repercussions? How in the heck is this thread still going on? Feels very much like an eventual powder keg-type thread I think we're keeping it fairly civil so far.
|
|
|
Post by Bootista on Dec 18, 2013 20:29:57 GMT -5
Imagine that, People on here wanting to take away Freedom of speech. No matter how Replusive I Find his opinions, He is entitled to freedom of speech. I'm sorry, I must've missed the part where people argued that the federal government should intervene to lock him away for stating what he thought. Don't bring up the First Amendment if you don't know what it contains, please. I took American Government so I'm well aware of what it means. I don't appreciate being talked down to either.
|
|
|
Post by Cyno on Dec 18, 2013 20:31:49 GMT -5
I haven't really gone out of my way to look at anuses for points of comparison, but does he even know what a vagina looks like? They're pretty freakin' ugly.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 18, 2013 20:32:20 GMT -5
I certainly don't agree with anything he said but I think forcing him off TV is ridiculous. Should we screen every TV star, actor or reality star to make sure they believe A, B and C before they are allowed to be on TV? Or if they don't believe A, B and C then put in their contract that they cannot reveal that they don't believe A, B and C? Thread's not about that, it's about popping off at the mouth and spreading wilding ignorant, inaccurate hurtful statements to the media. If you can't get forced off TV for that, what can you get forced off for? I shudder to think about what he would say about B2K. And the thread isn't about some B2K bullshit either. But what I said goes along with what you are saying about making statements to the media. If someone doesn't believe A, B and C should it be in their contract that they cannot talk about not believing A, B and C?
|
|
|
Post by HMARK Center on Dec 18, 2013 20:33:50 GMT -5
I'm sorry, I must've missed the part where people argued that the federal government should intervene to lock him away for stating what he thought. Don't bring up the First Amendment if you don't know what it contains, please. I took American Government so I'm well aware of what it means. I don't appreciate being talked down to either. Then please don't misuse the First Amendment in a response.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2013 20:34:17 GMT -5
How in the heck is this thread still going on? Feels very much like an eventual powder keg-type thread I think we're keeping it fairly civil so far. That's what blows my mind. Everywhere else I see this, it's a real donnybrook about religious stuff. I'm quite impressed honestly.
|
|