|
Post by KAMALARAMBO: BOOMSHAKALAKA!!! on Dec 22, 2013 17:02:52 GMT -5
Punk/Bryan for sure. I'm not all that interested in a Taker/Cena match honestly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2013 17:25:29 GMT -5
I'll say Cena / Taker on the basis I don't particularly want Punk / Bryan.
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Dec 22, 2013 17:26:36 GMT -5
Punk V Bryan for the title? Have I missed something? Hell for that matter who says we're getting Cena V Taker It's just hypothetical.
|
|
|
Post by thelonewolf527 on Dec 22, 2013 19:18:40 GMT -5
Okay I have to say, I am absolutely STUNNED that Bryan/Punk is actually winning.
I get that people like certain guys and all that, but to main event WrestleMania XXX and given what's happened with Undertaker matches since 25, really? How can ANY match that isn't Cena vs Taker go on after it?!
|
|
|
Post by angryfan on Dec 22, 2013 20:32:35 GMT -5
Punk/Bryan, because Cena/Taker would lead to Cena breaking the streak either at 30 or 31. Basically, we'd ether get Cena "does the impossible" at Mania 30, or we get a rehash of "I can't sleep, my life is in ruin, I HAVE to beat you" with Cena "redeeming" himself and ending the streak.
|
|
|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Dec 22, 2013 22:18:15 GMT -5
Punk/Bryan.
I have little to no interest in Cena/Taker. Plus the Rock's comeback and WWE's "Nostalgia sells, F*** all you other guys" style of booking the past couple of years has soured me on dream matches in general.
|
|
|
Post by Brooklynpunk97 on Dec 22, 2013 22:25:23 GMT -5
Cena/Taker
Even if Taker wins. Cena is the last person I could see beating the streak.
The very last one. After the match, Taker retires.
|
|
|
Post by steamboat1 on Dec 22, 2013 22:48:51 GMT -5
Punk vs Bryan last, just because I think they are the only two that can have a tempo fast enough and high spotted enough to follow Cena vs Taker.
Of course, if they pull the trigger on Cena beating Taker and this being Taker's last match, then Taker has to go last and deserves it.
|
|
RIHT
Hank Scorpio
Wanted a title with "YOU'RE WELCOME!" Close enough.
Hey-yo.
Posts: 5,897
|
Post by RIHT on Dec 23, 2013 0:00:00 GMT -5
The WWE title should always go on last. Ironic how for Mania 28, people wanted Punk to main event with the title because of tradition. Then for 29, we wanted Punk to main event with Taker, but WWE put Rock vs. Cena for the title in because of tradition.
|
|
|
Post by sybaku on Dec 23, 2013 0:08:22 GMT -5
As a huge fan of Bryan and perhaps one the last people around who doesn't care for Taker, it pains me to say it but Taker/Cena
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2013 0:11:01 GMT -5
I think Punk/Bryan closing after Cena/Taker could be really appropriate and symbolic. Like "here's our biggest match possible with two guys that are as big as they can ever get. And after that, here's the future." Sort of like how Angle/Lesnar closed Mania 19 instead of Austin/Rock.
I certainly wouldn't be "pissed" of think it's "wrong" if Cena/Taker was the last match, but I like the other way better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2013 13:01:32 GMT -5
If Cena/Taker was under Bryan/Punk then Bryan/Punk would get the same (if not WORSE) that Punk/Jericho got in exhausted crowd response times at Wrestlemania 28.
For that reason you HAVE to put 'Taker/Cena over Bryan/Punk, surely? You don't want the crowd to be dead for the last match on the card.
|
|
|
Post by Slammy Award-Winning Cannibal on Dec 23, 2013 13:12:22 GMT -5
Cena/Taker because it's been like a decade since they fought. Bryan/Punk is still fresh. So even if the latter does a great match, it will still feel familiar over Cena/Taker and therefore not have the best response for a closer.
|
|