|
Post by CATCH_US IS the Conversation on Dec 25, 2013 21:52:03 GMT -5
No, and I dont want it to be. Me either. That would mean a large shift in morale fabric of the world. Now before you jump my shit hear me out. I do believe the united states is media-wise repressed sexually. Nudity as in not just side boob and butt cheek, but nudity, on cable tv is not far off. But we can control access to it as parents. It isn't everywhere but what we have of it is leaps and bounds ahead of where we were 20 yrs ago. But we don't need acceptance toward money shots as we do with a mildly racy sex scene in a PG13 Movie. What that would mean to have hardcore scenes be as acceptable as a mildly racy sex scene (most have artistic flare that's why I use that example), is that as a society we drop most inhibitions as pertains to what access we give for young people to graphic content. That means we don't care as much to educate them slowly enough for better understanding of sex. To me that is too much too soon. Look I got ahold of porn when I was way too young and looking back, it legit gave me unreal expectations and ideas about sex. I wanted to do all these things but didn't understand why I would do them or that not every girl wanted her hair pulled or to be spanked. It took my own experiences to educate me. I probably hurt some girls feelings or freaked them out. Now later when I began to understand a bit better, some of those things I had seen and wanted to do were ok, but honestly I could have seen them at 23 instead of 13 and used them when understood. No. I don't want porn to be anymore mainstream than it is. The starlets and performers work hard at what they do and deserve credit for that. But the AVN awards belong on Showtime and vivid radio not NBC. I think there's a big difference between respecting pornography as a medium, and making sex and nudity widely available for young people to see. Treating pornography as a legit artform doesn't mean having to put it on mainstream television during prime time. Imo it just means not turning our noses up and slut shaming adult film performers or treating them like the scum of the earth.
|
|
|
Post by xCompackx on Dec 25, 2013 22:14:14 GMT -5
Me either. That would mean a large shift in morale fabric of the world. Now before you jump my shit hear me out. I do believe the united states is media-wise repressed sexually. Nudity as in not just side boob and butt cheek, but nudity, on cable tv is not far off. But we can control access to it as parents. It isn't everywhere but what we have of it is leaps and bounds ahead of where we were 20 yrs ago. But we don't need acceptance toward money shots as we do with a mildly racy sex scene in a PG13 Movie. What that would mean to have hardcore scenes be as acceptable as a mildly racy sex scene (most have artistic flare that's why I use that example), is that as a society we drop most inhibitions as pertains to what access we give for young people to graphic content. That means we don't care as much to educate them slowly enough for better understanding of sex. To me that is too much too soon. Look I got ahold of porn when I was way too young and looking back, it legit gave me unreal expectations and ideas about sex. I wanted to do all these things but didn't understand why I would do them or that not every girl wanted her hair pulled or to be spanked. It took my own experiences to educate me. I probably hurt some girls feelings or freaked them out. Now later when I began to understand a bit better, some of those things I had seen and wanted to do were ok, but honestly I could have seen them at 23 instead of 13 and used them when understood. No. I don't want porn to be anymore mainstream than it is. The starlets and performers work hard at what they do and deserve credit for that. But the AVN awards belong on Showtime and vivid radio not NBC. I think there's a big difference between respecting pornography as a medium, and making sex and nudity widely available for young people to see. Treating pornography as a legit artform and not slut shaming pornstars or treating them like the scum of the world doesn't mean having to put it on mainstream television during prime time. Does slut shaming still happen? I would think the fact that Twitter lets you talk to pornstars and see that they're real people would've ended that.
|
|
|
Post by Wolf Hawkfield no1 NZ poster on Dec 27, 2013 0:43:17 GMT -5
No and it wouldn't say much about art in general if stuff like Backdoor Sluts 9 or Anal Devastation 3 were considered art in some bizzro world.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2013 1:46:07 GMT -5
No and it wouldn't say much about art in general if stuff like Backdoor Sluts 9 or Anal Devastation 3 were considered art in some bizzro world. That's ridiculous. Backdoor Sluts IV not only used Roman numerals but starred Meryl Streep in one of the most gripping portrayals I've ever seen as Violetta, a blind woman who only wishes to be a rodeo clown. Dean Cundey's cinematography was breathtaking and if you didn't shed a tear when Scooter, Violetta's seeing eye dog died... Whew... You have no soul. Sadly the film's producers kept polishing their Oscars and missed the deadline to submit it for award consideration.
|
|
|
Post by Vice honcho room temperature on Dec 27, 2013 1:53:56 GMT -5
There is truth in art there is no truth in pornography. And if it there were it would get in the way of the fantasy sex that I came to see in the first place
|
|
|
Post by Cela on Dec 27, 2013 3:00:39 GMT -5
Needs more creative people. Andrew Blake did some very artistic movies, but by and large it is the last refuge of the failed entertainer.
|
|